Cheating - would you do it if you didn't get caught?

Cheating - would you do it if you didn't get caught?

Author
Discussion

mattmk391

224 posts

208 months

Tuesday 8th July 2014
quotequote all
PhillipM said:
Really? I've seen plenty of them fitting later engines in earlier cars for the extra power...that's not standard...
I'm fairly certain (but could be wrong) that no model of MX5 had benefited from a power increase later in its life without upping the capacity, hopefully scrutineers would spot that!

woof

8,456 posts

277 months

Wednesday 9th July 2014
quotequote all
mattmk391 said:
PhillipM said:
Really? I've seen plenty of them fitting later engines in earlier cars for the extra power...that's not standard...
I'm fairly certain (but could be wrong) that no model of MX5 had benefited from a power increase later in its life without upping the capacity, hopefully scrutineers would spot that!
A scrutineer spot that a car had too many cylinders - gosh no that would never happen say in Italy and with a Ferrari F1 car wink

Greensleeves

1,235 posts

203 months

Wednesday 9th July 2014
quotequote all
We have a simple rule in our series that if anyone is suspected of cheating we stick in a protest fee for the engine to be stripped. If it's legal, the guy gets to keep most go the fee to put it back together, if it's not, the protester gets their money back.

We encourage the publication of in-car videos on our forum and it is pretty obvious when someone is quicker than they should be. Although no-one has resorted to a protest yet, the threat of it seems to be sufficient to discourage cheating.

woof

8,456 posts

277 months

Wednesday 9th July 2014
quotequote all
Greensleeves said:
We have a simple rule in our series that if anyone is suspected of cheating we stick in a protest fee for the engine to be stripped. If it's legal, the guy gets to keep most go the fee to put it back together, if it's not, the protester gets their money back.

We encourage the publication of in-car videos on our forum and it is pretty obvious when someone is quicker than they should be. Although no-one has resorted to a protest yet, the threat of it seems to be sufficient to discourage cheating.
An engine strip and build must be 2-3k !?

Some of the series I've raced in - people/teams would use this against you as a way of taking you out of champs.

Last year a driver admitted that he had planned to drive me off the track and the team had told him not to worry about any damage to the car. Got it in writing as well !


Oilchange

8,462 posts

260 months

Wednesday 9th July 2014
quotequote all
Mmm, a deliberate act that could well endanger your life (and possibly others including spectators) and you have it in writing too. I'd have got a good lawyer...

This sport is dangerous enough without idiocy like that.

woof

8,456 posts

277 months

Wednesday 9th July 2014
quotequote all
Oilchange said:
Mmm, a deliberate act that could well endanger your life (and possibly others including spectators) and you have it in writing too. I'd have got a good lawyer...

This sport is dangerous enough without idiocy like that.
I know - I've been wondering what to do with it to be honest.
The person isn't racing at the moment and perhaps it's best left like that.


skeggysteve

5,724 posts

217 months

Wednesday 9th July 2014
quotequote all
I remember a car being protested for running a 5 speed 'box when only 4 speed was allowed.

Scruts laughed when they looked at our 'box and found a 4 speed 'box and our explanation that
we didn't need a 1st gear in qualifying.


Greensleeves

1,235 posts

203 months

Thursday 10th July 2014
quotequote all
woof said:
Greensleeves said:
We have a simple rule in our series that if anyone is suspected of cheating we stick in a protest fee for the engine to be stripped. If it's legal, the guy gets to keep most go the fee to put it back together, if it's not, the protester gets their money back.

We encourage the publication of in-car videos on our forum and it is pretty obvious when someone is quicker than they should be. Although no-one has resorted to a protest yet, the threat of it seems to be sufficient to discourage cheating.
An engine strip and build must be 2-3k !?

Some of the series I've raced in - people/teams would use this against you as a way of taking you out of champs.

Last year a driver admitted that he had planned to drive me off the track and the team had told him not to worry about any damage to the car. Got it in writing as well !
We run standard engines so a complete rebuild with parts and labour is about 600 quid.

Strip means whip head off and check cams, bore and stroke plus piston tops then stick the head back on.

We race for fun and all the paddock gets on so we haven't had to take a spanner to one yet. Hopefully it will stay that way.

MR2 series with Track Attack if anyone fancies a go. The mentioned 3k above would buy you a good car and half a seasons racing.

spyderman8

1,748 posts

156 months

Thursday 10th July 2014
quotequote all
Wouldn't it be easier to just dyno the car? This would probably pick up a remap too.

woof

8,456 posts

277 months

Thursday 10th July 2014
quotequote all
Greensleeves said:
woof said:
Greensleeves said:
We have a simple rule in our series that if anyone is suspected of cheating we stick in a protest fee for the engine to be stripped. If it's legal, the guy gets to keep most go the fee to put it back together, if it's not, the protester gets their money back.

We encourage the publication of in-car videos on our forum and it is pretty obvious when someone is quicker than they should be. Although no-one has resorted to a protest yet, the threat of it seems to be sufficient to discourage cheating.
An engine strip and build must be 2-3k !?

Some of the series I've raced in - people/teams would use this against you as a way of taking you out of champs.

Last year a driver admitted that he had planned to drive me off the track and the team had told him not to worry about any damage to the car. Got it in writing as well !
We run standard engines so a complete rebuild with parts and labour is about 600 quid.

Strip means whip head off and check cams, bore and stroke plus piston tops then stick the head back on.

We race for fun and all the paddock gets on so we haven't had to take a spanner to one yet. Hopefully it will stay that way.

MR2 series with Track Attack if anyone fancies a go. The mentioned 3k above would buy you a good car and half a seasons racing.
I wont tell you how much the 1 lap of Spa cost me then !


megamaniac

1,057 posts

216 months

Thursday 10th July 2014
quotequote all
woof said:
I wont tell you how much the 1 lap of Spa cost me then !
Go on. Ours cost 240 hrs prep plus £3000 in parts only for the 1st driver to think 10300 rpm was acceptable on a downchange, straight from 4th to second. Tosser springs to mind.

megamaniac

1,057 posts

216 months

Thursday 10th July 2014
quotequote all
woof said:
I wont tell you how much the 1 lap of Spa cost me then !
Go on. Ours cost 240 hrs prep plus £3000 in parts only for the 1st driver to think 10300 rpm was acceptable on a downchange, straight from 4th to second. Tosser springs to mind.

PhillipM

6,520 posts

189 months

Saturday 12th July 2014
quotequote all
mattmk391 said:
I'm fairly certain (but could be wrong) that no model of MX5 had benefited from a power increase later in its life without upping the capacity, hopefully scrutineers would spot that!
I've seen plenty of the later MkIII 2.0L engines in Mk2 cars going racing...

itdontgo

50 posts

132 months

Sunday 13th July 2014
quotequote all
Cheating. That's calling being a motorist... 'I am a better driver than you coz you drive a Fiesta and I drive a Porsche'

bucksmanuk

2,311 posts

170 months

Friday 18th July 2014
quotequote all
Keep talking chaps - all good stuff! – Eligibility scrutineer here….
Some of us do know our way around an ECU….

n3il123

2,607 posts

213 months

Friday 18th July 2014
quotequote all
andrewcliffe said:
Not sure they can....
Unless the declared co-ordinator isn't really the co-ordinator, and I'm not sure the MSA would look kindly at that.

MSA Blue Book, Section W, clause 2.2

2.2. A Championship Co-ordinator, Championship Stewards (minimum three) and an Eligibility Scrutineer must be nominated on the Application Form by the Organisers and there may be no duplication of duties. None may be Competitors in the Championship, prepare entries for the Championship or be sponsors of Competitors in the Championship.

Edited by andrewcliffe on Tuesday 8th July 22:10
Although depends whether it is a series or a championship, I don't know in this case.

staceyboy

77 posts

169 months

Thursday 31st July 2014
quotequote all
'No glory without honour' as someone once said.