Login | Register
SearchMy Stuff
My ProfileMy PreferencesMy Mates RSS Feed
1
3 4
Reply to Topic
Author Discussion

Storer

1,990 posts

84 months

[news] 
Monday 4th June 2012 quote quote all
If you have no panel between the cabin and the engine fire wall you gain a bit of leg room but it does make it a bit noisier.


Paul

langy

Original Poster:

350 posts

108 months

[news] 
Tuesday 5th June 2012 quote quote all
Iain351w said:
Just one thing Langy; I've been scouting around for a bit, and had a good nose around the Ultima stand at Stoneleigh.
I'm a fraction shorter than you, (186cm) but fairly long in the torso, and I didn't fit in any of their demonstrators. I could only close the door if I tucked my chin right down, and needless to say couldn't sit properly when fully enclosed in the car.
The seats were of the bucket style on a small runner, so it might be possible to lose a little bit of height (?) but the base of the seat seemed pretty close to the floor. The employee on the stand wasn't terribly helpful or interested, and when I asked if the pedal box was adjustable (Thinking I could scooch forward then tip my seat back) he just said 'no'.
I haven't taken my interest much further since then, also because I'd like to use it for track days I can't see me fitting with a helmet on in a million years..
Ideally I'd like to have a sit in something that's been built with a side mount seat perhaps, to see if it gives more headroom, but I've not had the chance as yet.
I wonder what the taller owners do?
Cheers
Iain
Iain, Thanks for the heads up, will bear that in mind, especially about fitting me + helmet in.
I guess 'we' wouldn't have the issue in a Can-am laugh

356Speedster

1,632 posts

100 months

[news] 
Tuesday 5th June 2012 quote quote all
Iain351w said:
I wonder what the taller owners do?
Easy, build a Can Am instead, no such headroom worries there thumbup

Davrianman

444 posts

133 months

[news] 
Tuesday 5th June 2012 quote quote all
One option I took was to have a single connecting tube between the front and rear roll bars. Gave me a lot more headroom as I struggled to fit too. I'm only 6ft but I have short legs and a long body. Sitting down I am the same height as my 6'6" mate. Worth asking the factory about this option. It didn't cost any extra at the time too.

Iain351w

6 posts

11 months

[news] 
Tuesday 5th June 2012 quote quote all
356Speedster said:
Easy, build a Can Am instead, no such headroom worries there thumbup
I'd always want to opt for a roof I'm afraid, as I wouldn't want weather conditions to spoil my fun. Additionally whilst you have unlimited headroom in a Can-Am as you imply, my experience of a Lotus 2-11 wasn't comfortable at all as my noggin was full on in the wind and it's just impossible to enjoy it when you feel like your head is going to get ripped off! (That was with a full face helmet of course...) How the aerodynamics of a Can-Am work out for taller drivers I don't know?
Cheers
Iain
Advertisement

langy

Original Poster:

350 posts

108 months

[news] 
Friday 8th June 2012 quote quote all
OK, 1st look at a GTR today. It had a lowered floor, so headroom was not an issue, although would need to try wearing a helmet and see what it was like.

Car was OK, not a concourse example, but would suffice. Need to look at a few other to compare /contrast.

Unfortunately, no test drive as the batteries were flat, but in all honesty, i was more than happy to look.

langy

Original Poster:

350 posts

108 months

[news] 
Monday 23rd July 2012 quote quote all
Se7en has now been sold. Time for the fun bit.......smile

Life Saab Itch

34,076 posts

57 months

[news] 
Tuesday 24th July 2012 quote quote all
Iain351w said:
Just one thing Langy; I've been scouting around for a bit, and had a good nose around the Ultima stand at Stoneleigh.
I'm a fraction shorter than you, (186cm) but fairly long in the torso, and I didn't fit in any of their demonstrators. I could only close the door if I tucked my chin right down, and needless to say couldn't sit properly when fully enclosed in the car.
The seats were of the bucket style on a small runner, so it might be possible to lose a little bit of height (?) but the base of the seat seemed pretty close to the floor. The employee on the stand wasn't terribly helpful or interested, and when I asked if the pedal box was adjustable (Thinking I could scooch forward then tip my seat back) he just said 'no'.
I haven't taken my interest much further since then, also because I'd like to use it for track days I can't see me fitting with a helmet on in a million years..
Ideally I'd like to have a sit in something that's been built with a side mount seat perhaps, to see if it gives more headroom, but I've not had the chance as yet.
I wonder what the taller owners do?
Cheers
Iain
Just a quick point here. The pedal box is adjustable. These type of pedal boxes always take a bit of playing with to get them right. I seem to remember CJ struggling to get the brake bias cable in around the throttle pedal on his GTR build. With some adjustment and a small bit of modification (shortening the master cylinder pushrods) you should be able to move the pedals back a hole on the base.

Don't let this limit you in your decision. smile

Verde

391 posts

57 months

[news] 
Sunday 29th July 2012 quote quote all
The most important thing to look for when buying a pre-owned/pre-built Ultima is... the builder. The complexity of the car is sufficiently high that it is hard to inspect all of the important bits and bobs that need to be understood. Moreover, you can't depend solely on the state of a given part, but the interaction of all of the parts that yield a great car. In that regard, you need to determine if the builder has sufficient expertise, took sufficient time, and when altering the factory specifications in some manner, was it appropriate and well executed.
Parts (or assemblies) like the engine and transmission can ultimately be replaced in a complete and modular manner. So I would focus my quality inspection on 'everything else'. The details of the riveting, the cooling implementation, the design and detail of the interior, how the electrical and fluid lines run from fore to aft.
I do agree that it is preferable to install a fuel injected small-block, but if pricing is tight then you can't be choosy. Again, it's the quality and care of the rest of the car that can't really be changed. Ever.
Best of luck with the search,
B

Gulf LS3

1,916 posts

73 months

[news] 
Sunday 29th July 2012 quote quote all


My Can-Am was 'only' 400bhp vs the 630odd of my GTR but both were way quicker than pretty much anything I ever encountered on a trackday.




I think that is a little misleading Stig.....

A standard Ultima on road tyres is not that quick on track, i know you have done quite a bit of racing but the Ultimas ive seen on track recently have certainly not been 'way quicker than pretty much anything'

Westfield owners refer to Ultimas as mobile chicanes as im sure you are aware, Caterhams, Nobles, Radicals, Atoms, most bike engined vehicles if light enough are all quicker.

The factory 720 is obviously a lovely quick car but as most know its quite different from a standard Ultima.

Ultimas are devastating down the straights but on the brakes very early and slow round the corners. Im sure its frustrating following them for a lot of trackday goers.




V8Dom

2,273 posts

71 months

[news] 
Sunday 29th July 2012 quote quote all
Gulf LS3 said:
I think that is a little misleading Stig.....

A standard Ultima on road tyres is not that quick on track, i know you have done quite a bit of racing but the Ultimas ive seen on track recently have certainly not been 'way quicker than pretty much anything'

Westfield owners refer to Ultimas as mobile chicanes as im sure you are aware, Caterhams, Nobles, Radicals, Atoms, most bike engined vehicles if light enough are all quicker.
mmm Stig is correct in what he is saying, as he is going by his experiance he had what 5 years ago?? , Yes times have moved on now and the Ultima hasnt, so that statement isnt altogether incorrect.
And although the westys/radicals etc are very fast, im not sure a noble ahould be in that list..Nothing against a noble.

I know one thing though, if you loose it, id rather be in an Ultima, westys, caterhams you feel very vunerable.

Dom

Gulf LS3

1,916 posts

73 months

[news] 
Sunday 29th July 2012 quote quote all
Pop along to Oulton sometime Dom and see for yourself... Nobles are definately quicker pound for pound, i could add to the list but i was just trying to make a point, trackday use has been mentioned and i felt Stigs post was not a fair reflection of what ive seen.

Obviously a car like Martins should be a different storysmile

highflyer

1,382 posts

95 months

[news] 
Sunday 29th July 2012 quote quote all
surely its down to the skill of the driver.
Isn't Martins car an Ultima ?

356Speedster

1,632 posts

100 months

[news] 
Sunday 29th July 2012 quote quote all
highflyer said:
surely its down to the skill of the driver.
Fully agree, you can't generalise any car as being faster than another without doing some scientific comparissions to remove the variables. Track days cater for a wide variety of people, with different skills and objectives. I've seen as many onboard vids of Ultimas on a mission and passing everything in sight, as I have just enjoying the drive and having some sensible fun, so such generalisations are clearly pap.

In terms of laptimes, the best data I could find is from the Top Gear track where the 720 GTR did 1.09 (slicks) and 1.12 (street tyres), which are deeply impressive times. According to TG's site, the M12 GTO did a 1.33 and the M400 a 1:25.... the Atom a 1.19, the R500 a 1.17 and the MP4-12 a 1.16.

I think it's fair to say that any Ultima has the potential to be a pretty swift motor on any given track, how far owners go with power, brakes, suspension, driver training and the like, will ultimate dictate a laptime on any track..... much like any other car.

738 driver

1,187 posts

62 months

[news] 
Sunday 29th July 2012 quote quote all
But as was mentioned..........not a stock factory example.. so not really apples to apples.

Bit like comparing a production RS2000 to its Ford team prepped version... potential might be there but thats not what the average owner-builder executes.
We can all come up with grand engine specs but its the whole matched package that produces the goods .

deadscoob

1,042 posts

129 months

[news] 
Monday 30th July 2012 quote quote all
"Westfield owners refer to Ultimas as mobile chicanes as im sure you are aware, Caterhams, Nobles, Radicals, Atoms, most bike engined vehicles if light enough are all quicker.

The factory 720 is obviously a lovely quick car but as most know its quite different from a standard Ultima.

Ultimas are devastating down the straights but on the brakes very early and slow round the corners. Im sure its frustrating following them for a lot of trackday goers"

Nice bit of generalisation there. Most bike engined cars are not quicker - most bike engined cars driven by better drivers will be. Ultimas don't brake and corner slowly, their owners do. If the car isn't set up well and the owner is not experienced or cautious, it won't be quick - wow what a revelation rolleyes

An example of how relatively quick they are is the Macgtech car (disregard the reliabilty at the mo)- initially iirc, the wishbones were the normal short ones, it had slicks, a high downforce rear wing and a big splitter. You don't seem many Caterhams, Westfields or Atoms doing 1.10s at Donington when on slicks..

I haven't seen many Ultimas on track and I think a large number of Caterham, Westfield and Atom owner do regular trackdays - so they're generally more experienced and all of the above are a hell of a lot easier to drive than an Ultima. Radicals more so. I've been on trackdays in Imprezas and Westfields and have been held up by Caterhams, Westfields, Atoms, Nobles, Porsches, Ferraris and Radicals, but so what, it's not a race, everyone goes at their own pace. Additionally the typical Ultima owner has a huge amount more at stake - £40K minimum normally, which is the maximum for most Caterhams and Atoms. Radicals are normally track only and I think are typically used harder. Regarding tyres, road tyres in sizes for Ultimas are typically quite outdated, the best are PS2s which are good on road but crap on track. Most Caterhams and Westfields have sticky Avons or other track spec tyres, Radicals will normally be on slicks.

The factory TG car (assuming it had the long front wishbones) would undoubtably be faster on most tracks, but I'd guess the wishbones would make 2-3 secs round the TG track assuming everything else equal - aside from the wishbones there was little else different, springs and that's it? Despite the flaws of the std wishbones, something like SS's splitter setup would offset some of the understeer, obviously the full hog like Mr Storer is ideal.

Regardless, with an equal driver, a 500hp Ultima on track springs, settings and decent tyres will be faster than all factory Caterhams, Westfields and Radicals apart from the v8.

I'm going to Bedford in August, will keep count of cars I hold up and post the list smile



Edited by deadscoob on Monday 30th July 08:07


Edited by deadscoob on Monday 30th July 08:08

langy

Original Poster:

350 posts

108 months

[news] 
Monday 30th July 2012 quote quote all
Interesting discussion going on here.

I agree with some comments above about the Westfield / Caterham driver is more likely to do more trackdays than teh average Ultima owner. I done maybe a dozen or so trackdays in my 8 years of owning my Quantum Xtreme. I never insured my car on trackdays, i figured if I bent it, the excess would be so high it would probably be written off anyway. If i had an Ultima (or similar), then I'd probably take out trackday insurance. I wouldn't be interested in having slick tyres etc, to me, that means tow car and trailer, which I won't be buying.

I want something that I can drive sensibly, with gusto and everything inbetween. Am starting to think the Ultima may not be the thing for me, but still undecided either way. Have been looking at the Ginetta G40R and a few R300's wink

Gulf LS3

1,916 posts

73 months

[news] 
Monday 30th July 2012 quote quote all
738 driver said:
But as was mentioned..........not a stock factory example.. so not really apples to apples.

Bit like comparing a production RS2000 to its Ford team prepped version... potential might be there but thats not what the average owner-builder executes.
We can all come up with grand engine specs but its the whole matched package that produces the goods .
my point exactly....


Gulf LS3

1,916 posts

73 months

[news] 
Monday 30th July 2012 quote quote all


Regardless, with an equal driver, a 500hp Ultima on track springs, settings and decent tyres will be faster than all factory Caterhams, Westfields and Radicals apart from the v8.


Not a chance, a well driven R300, R400 Caterham will be quicker and a Radical will blitz your above Ultima.

Anyway, it would be nice to see a few standard Ultimas out on track to prove me wrong...

Andy Burrows was out in his T70 recently and that was going well.



deadscoob

1,042 posts

129 months

[news] 
Monday 30th July 2012 quote quote all
You should try and articulate a little better then.

You said standard Ultimas aren't that quick. If they're built to factory spec they are pretty quick.
What you actually meant is a typical standard built Ultima isn't that quick, so if you chuck it together or bodge a few things it won't be great.

Have you ever set one up for track use based on your own settings?
1
3 4
Reply to Topic