Mercedes Slr Mclaren engine

Mercedes Slr Mclaren engine

Author
Discussion

Mertens

Original Poster:

37 posts

115 months

Wednesday 25th February 2015
quotequote all
I can get my hands on 2 Mercedes Slr Mclaren engines and I'm very tempted to get it in the Gtr.
The engine fits however with some engineering issues.


Would this be a better way than the Amerspeed LS7-route ?

macgtech

997 posts

159 months

Wednesday 25th February 2015
quotequote all
Mertens said:
I can get my hands on 2 Mercedes Slr Mclaren engines and I'm very tempted to get it in the Gtr.
The engine fits however with some engineering issues.


Would this be a better way than the Amerspeed LS7-route ?
Would certainly be a hell of a project, and would be a fantastic machine when done. I am not sure how much electronics are involved but I can imagine there is a fair amount more than on an LS, and obviously everything would effectively have to be bespoke (loom, ECU etc). Which is daunting for some, a piece of cake for others!

The other things is - would it fit?

Mertens

Original Poster:

37 posts

115 months

Wednesday 25th February 2015
quotequote all
macgtech said:
Would certainly be a hell of a project, and would be a fantastic machine when done. I am not sure how much electronics are involved but I can imagine there is a fair amount more than on an LS, and obviously everything would effectively have to be bespoke (loom, ECU etc). Which is daunting for some, a piece of cake for others!

The other things is - would it fit?
I'm afraid it does... It is a money thing but so tempting...
Probably I'll have to do some more shopping with you when I get it installed.

macgtech

997 posts

159 months

Wednesday 25th February 2015
quotequote all
Mertens said:
I'm afraid it does... It is a money thing but so tempting...
Probably I'll have to do some more shopping with you when I get it installed.
Sounds good to me - do it!

Mertens

Original Poster:

37 posts

115 months

Wednesday 25th February 2015
quotequote all
macgtech said:
Sounds good to me - do it!
Should I take the 2 engines so we do one each ?

chuntington101

5,733 posts

236 months

Wednesday 25th February 2015
quotequote all
Do t they only make about 550bhp out the factory? What supercharger do they use? Would need a couple of turbos I recon to really light the engine off. smile

Mertens

Original Poster:

37 posts

115 months

Thursday 26th February 2015
quotequote all
chuntington101 said:
Do t they only make about 550bhp out the factory? What supercharger do they use? Would need a couple of turbos I recon to really light the engine off. smile
The SLR sports a 232 kg (511 lb) hand-built 5,439 cc (5.439 L; 331.9 cu in), supercharged, all-aluminium, SOHC, V8 engine. The cylinders are angled at 90 degrees with three valves per cylinder and lubricated via a dry sump system. The compression ratio is 8.8:1 and the bore and stroke is 97 mm × 92 mm (3.8 in × 3.6 in). The Lysholm-type twin-screw supercharger rotates at 23,000 rpm and produces 0.9 bar (13 psi) of boost. The compressed air is then cooled via two intercoolers. The engine generates a maximum power of 626 PS (460 kW; 617 hp) at 6,500 rpm and maximum torque of 780 N·m (580 lb·ft) at 3,250 to 5,000 rpm.

The horses are European (wheel) compared to the American wich are pony's (flywheel). With this in mind I
think the GTR won't be a snail with the SLR-engine inside.

chuntington101

5,733 posts

236 months

Thursday 26th February 2015
quotequote all
Mertens said:
chuntington101 said:
Do t they only make about 550bhp out the factory? What supercharger do they use? Would need a couple of turbos I recon to really light the engine off. smile
The SLR sports a 232 kg (511 lb) hand-built 5,439 cc (5.439 L; 331.9 cu in), supercharged, all-aluminium, SOHC, V8 engine. The cylinders are angled at 90 degrees with three valves per cylinder and lubricated via a dry sump system. The compression ratio is 8.8:1 and the bore and stroke is 97 mm × 92 mm (3.8 in × 3.6 in). The Lysholm-type twin-screw supercharger rotates at 23,000 rpm and produces 0.9 bar (13 psi) of boost. The compressed air is then cooled via two intercoolers. The engine generates a maximum power of 626 PS (460 kW; 617 hp) at 6,500 rpm and maximum torque of 780 N·m (580 lb·ft) at 3,250 to 5,000 rpm.

The horses are European (wheel) compared to the American wich are pony's (flywheel). With this in mind I
think the GTR won't be a snail with the SLR-engine inside.
Oh it wouldn't be slow at all! I was just comparing it to a comparable GM engine. Sounds pretty much like a LS9 engine to give you some reference to GM machinery.

Still think it would be a beast with a Garrett GT35RS turbo strapped to each side of the engine. smile

F.C.

3,897 posts

208 months

Thursday 26th February 2015
quotequote all
The biggest problem with that package will be fitting the intercooling in such a way that it is comparable to the original, some may say charge-cool it
but again packaging a charge-cooler that is as efficient as the original SLR's intercooler would be a near fruitless exercise IMO.
Stonking motor though!

Mertens

Original Poster:

37 posts

115 months

Thursday 26th February 2015
quotequote all
F.C. said:
The biggest problem with that package will be fitting the intercooling in such a way that it is comparable to the original, some may say charge-cool it
but again packaging a charge-cooler that is as efficient as the original SLR's intercooler would be a near fruitless exercise IMO.
Stonking motor though!
Yes cooling is the issue but I've got a few engineers that are quite sure they can solve it. I can even
get a money back-deal from my seller, who would also install it if I decide to take this route, in case the engine doesn't get in.

(Only problem that holds me back is that it is "alot of money back"-garantee...)

Edited by Mertens on Thursday 26th February 12:42


Edited by Mertens on Thursday 26th February 12:43

chuntington101

5,733 posts

236 months

Thursday 26th February 2015
quotequote all
F.C. said:
The biggest problem with that package will be fitting the intercooling in such a way that it is comparable to the original, some may say charge-cool it
but again packaging a charge-cooler that is as efficient as the original SLR's intercooler would be a near fruitless exercise IMO.
Stonking motor though!
Why not just use the original charge cooler(s) and appropriately sized low temperature radiators (LTR)? AB mounted the one on the 1000bhp LS engined ultima they did in front of the radiator. You could also look to mount additional ones in the side pods (might need to make cooling 'packs' for oil and AC).

The stock charge coolers actually look pretty big (big black things sat on top of the engine if you google a pic) so should be able to support the power. only issue would be getting the heat out with LTRs.

Alternatively you could use the stock supercharger and then run dual intercoolers in the side pod area. The intake for the supercharger could be routed to a nice large top mounted filter also.

Also looks like Weistec are already doing a twin turbo kit for the SLR. They use a third chargecooler mounted before the stock chargecoolers. Interesting setup.

http://www.benzboost.com/content.php?5100-Weistec-...
http://weistec.com/all/slr/slr/2003-2010-w199-m155...

Edited by chuntington101 on Thursday 26th February 12:57

Mertens

Original Poster:

37 posts

115 months

Saturday 28th February 2015
quotequote all
Going to make a decision this week...
Audi v8 / v10, BMW v10 or Mercedes Mc Laren V8.

My wallet says Audi but my heart Mc Laren...