My cars development

My cars development

Author
Discussion

BogBeast

1,136 posts

263 months

Monday 11th April 2016
quotequote all
02PRUV said:
And Alex I decided that a dual fuel tank idea was a joke when I first built my car. Welded some -20 fittings on the tank to have a big link pipe between the two tanks for balancing so you can go to the petrol station and fill up from either side and it will balance as quick as you fill it. Also put in a 5 litre surge tank to get the fuel capacity up a bit more and use an external Walbro 255 pulling from both tanks to fill the surge tank and a Peirburg 800 to supply the engine. 044's are just too noisey.

You can see the -20 at the lowest point on the firewall

Bigger outlets are something I would have done in hindsight, although I wouldn't trust myself ally welding. Did your remove the foam (assuming the tanks have it these days..)?

Nice removable cross brace brace - did you calculate up he stresses sand design that layout - not one I have seen before.


ROWDYRENAULT

1,270 posts

214 months

Monday 11th April 2016
quotequote all
Im thinking that the cross brace shown is a brilliant idea. What I might add and I have to say its always easier to see after somebody else turned on the lights. I would consider a mechanical screw link fixed to both the forward and rear cross shafts so that with no load on the chassis you could adjust the lengths to exactly the right length. So I would have the brace attach exactly as shown in the picture then maybe three inches of tube that is threaded right hand then a matching tube threaded left hand with a big ass bolt threaded appropriately with a flat spot in the middle and a set nut on either side. I would make the brace out of round thick wall tube and use welded inserts for the threaded part. I think round tube is stronger in compression than square. But as I say I think the idea of doing both cross members as one unit is way to cool. Lee

F.C.

3,897 posts

208 months

Monday 11th April 2016
quotequote all
deadscoob said:
358kw= approx 480hp. The AS 720 loses 240hp from Dyno to wheels? That doeant seem right?
I reckon your right I know my car is pulling 525-550 at the contact patch and that's on a dyno known for their non bullst approach.
Which would mean my car is making >750 Bhp at the crank on 1-2 lbs boost, which is highly unlikely.

02PRUV

218 posts

161 months

Monday 11th April 2016
quotequote all
BogBeast said:
02PRUV said:
And Alex I decided that a dual fuel tank idea was a joke when I first built my car. Welded some -20 fittings on the tank to have a big link pipe between the two tanks for balancing so you can go to the petrol station and fill up from either side and it will balance as quick as you fill it. Also put in a 5 litre surge tank to get the fuel capacity up a bit more and use an external Walbro 255 pulling from both tanks to fill the surge tank and a Peirburg 800 to supply the engine. 044's are just too noisey.

You can see the -20 at the lowest point on the firewall

Bigger outlets are something I would have done in hindsight, although I wouldn't trust myself ally welding. Did your remove the foam (assuming the tanks have it these days..)?

Nice removable cross brace brace - did you calculate up he stresses sand design that layout - not one I have seen before.
Yes the cross brace has been engineered to strengthen the back of the car and increase chassis torsion on a weak section of chassis. If you notice even the factory has crossbraced this section in the newer chassis. This section is also made out of cromolly. Making it removable mean engine and box can be removed together and also my gearbox can be removed by itself. My new gearbox has a full sized bellhousing which wouldn't come out between the original bars. Also the gearbox is taller and needed to be raised in the centre. We also lowered the crossbrace on each side to fit bigger mufflers.

ROWDYRENAULT

1,270 posts

214 months

Monday 11th April 2016
quotequote all
More great thinking on your part lowering the cross bars to allow bigger mufflers. Well done. Lee

key750

259 posts

176 months

Tuesday 12th April 2016
quotequote all
ROWDYRENAULT said:
More great thinking on your part lowering the cross bars to allow bigger mufflers. Well done. Lee
I have take the easier way: I have modified my new silencers:


F.C.

3,897 posts

208 months

Tuesday 12th April 2016
quotequote all
key750 said:
I have take the easier way: I have modified my new silencers:

Seeing as this just turned in to an exhaust thread:

F.C.

3,897 posts

208 months

Tuesday 12th April 2016
quotequote all
F.C. said:
Seeing as this just turned in to an exhaust thread:

key750

259 posts

176 months

Tuesday 12th April 2016
quotequote all
Mate I own a SBC SC Can Am, I don't have space under my clam.

Excuse this O.T.

AlexCim

Original Poster:

156 posts

154 months

Wednesday 13th April 2016
quotequote all
02PRUV - You are putting in an ST6 right? The 044's are working fine now they're inside the surge tank - they are very quiet. If I had had to do it all again, I'd put a big link pipe. But now it's a problem because it's really hard to weld on another fitting with the tanks in situ. So I'm kinda screwed.

The -6 is working OK. But there are some funny buggers going on at the moment which I am investing and will return with results. I think one side may be filling up more... but, as I said, need to investigate.

Anyway, for now, I also blew my up my a/c compressor the other day...




Edited by AlexCim on Wednesday 13th April 06:58

deadscoob

2,263 posts

260 months

Wednesday 13th April 2016
quotequote all
Wow - that's an impressive job! Any idea why that happenned?

AlexCim

Original Poster:

156 posts

154 months

Wednesday 13th April 2016
quotequote all
No idea - but my A/C never really worked well and made my belt squealed a bit when engaging, so perhaps the clutch was rooted or something. Not sure.



Another picture.

Steve_D

13,747 posts

258 months

Wednesday 13th April 2016
quotequote all
The clutch is unlikely to be at fault, after all it only engages/disengages drive to the compressor.
More likely to be lack of oil in the system and a piston seized.

Steve

F.C.

3,897 posts

208 months

Thursday 14th April 2016
quotequote all
Steve_D said:
The clutch is unlikely to be at fault, after all it only engages/disengages drive to the compressor.
More likely to be lack of oil in the system and a piston seized.

Steve
+1 something locked up in there.

Nice job by the way!

Brother D

3,720 posts

176 months

Monday 18th April 2016
quotequote all
AlexCim said:
No idea - but my A/C never really worked well and made my belt squealed a bit when engaging, so perhaps the clutch was rooted or something. Not sure.



Another picture.
(Am I the only one who didn't know A/C compressors used a wobble/swash plate)? I feel like at my age I should have know this...

UltimaCH

3,155 posts

189 months

Tuesday 19th April 2016
quotequote all
Nor I, as I have never seen the inside of an A7C compressor

F.C.

3,897 posts

208 months

Tuesday 19th April 2016
quotequote all
Brother D said:
(Am I the only one who didn't know A/C compressors used a wobble/swash plate)? I feel like at my age I should have know this...
Nope, till last year anyway.
Took mine apart after it seized, quite a nice piece of engineering.