New Evolution 2

New Evolution 2

Author
Discussion

UltimaFAN

107 posts

130 months

Thursday 26th May 2016
quotequote all
3 years waiting time for a turn-key is extremely long. Richard might loose several sales with this situation. It is the risk between scaling up production and keeping an order book fully filled.

F.C.

3,897 posts

209 months

Friday 27th May 2016
quotequote all
UltimaFAN said:
3 years waiting time for a turn-key is extremely long. Richard might loose several sales with this situation. It is the risk between scaling up production and keeping an order book fully filled.
It is, I think they could increase production based on that order book but if it means bigger premises and more staff then the pay back for them may not be worth the outlay also there's a point (not that its likely to be reached soon) where production takes the company out of "low" vehicle production.

Turquoise

1,457 posts

98 months

Friday 27th May 2016
quotequote all
I would not wait 3 years for an Ultima.

Abbosevolution

352 posts

136 months

Friday 27th May 2016
quotequote all
If you dont want to wait then build it yourself, you dont get that option with other supercars.

mt308

438 posts

144 months

Friday 27th May 2016
quotequote all
Abbosevolution said:
If you dont want to wait then build it yourself, you dont get that option with other supercars.
The other option is to find someone else to build it for you. I built mine, but appreciate not everyone has the time or inclination.

Racingroj

488 posts

164 months

Friday 27th May 2016
quotequote all
There are at least 3 quality builder alternatives that I know of if you want to go another route. If 3 years is correct then that is too long. 12 months is too long. 6 to 9 months would be my limit for having one built.

Turquoise

1,457 posts

98 months

Friday 27th May 2016
quotequote all
Abbosevolution said:
If you dont want to wait then build it yourself, you dont get that option with other supercars.
If I built it myself it would take longer than 3 years and the car wouldn't last 3 minutes!

andygtt

8,345 posts

265 months

Friday 27th May 2016
quotequote all
Juno said:
It should have said New Evolution 1020 but my slow internet deleted the other figures Lol

Anyway if its plus VAT as well then i will forget it mad

V8Dom said:
why Evolution 2... have i missed another car launch?
Strangly according to that link the new Evolution 1020's 0-150mph time of 8.9seconds is similar to what I can do in my Noble with road tyres!.... the noble might be full carbon bodied but it still weighs over 1000kgs.

not that you can believe everything in that article, after all I make it a 9 second car rather than a 10 second one lol

They really have put the price up massively since I built my Ultima in 2001, madness.... but if they have a full order book for years ahead then clearly they have actually got it right?

tjlees

1,382 posts

238 months

Friday 27th May 2016
quotequote all
Nope - the prices for the factory parts (from 2010) are similar, sometimes cheaper and sometimes more for things like the fancy gear-lever. The chassis is slightly more because it stiffer and FIA compliant.

As you expect the extra cost comes from the engine at $40k + vat + import and £15.5k for the strengthened gt2 RS like gearbox. The exhaust will be significantly more because it definitely needs coating and the engine needs a good expensive fuelling system.

Edited by tjlees on Friday 27th May 19:47

845ste

577 posts

128 months

Friday 27th May 2016
quotequote all
is not exact, the majority of small components is doubled, tripled, and in some cases even quadrupled.
and they are always the same components, although they say that something changes ....
just tried it on my skin weepingfurious

Abbosevolution

352 posts

136 months

Saturday 28th May 2016
quotequote all
Turquoise said:
If I built it myself it would take longer than 3 years and the car wouldn't last 3 minutes!
laugh Go on - give it a try - you'l be suprised what you can do - the sense of achievement is something I hadn't appreciated until I built mine

V8Dom

3,546 posts

203 months

Thursday 2nd June 2016
quotequote all
im going to put theh cat among the pigeons and ask how it compares to the new turn key radical?

CL GTR

24 posts

98 months

Thursday 2nd June 2016
quotequote all
Well the specs say the Radical RXC's weight is from 935kg so you could say a 700hp Utima Evo would be faster in a drag with a 220hp advantage. Around the track I say it would go to the RXC with the aero advantage but I think there wouldn't be too much in it depending on the track and if the Ultima was on slicks.

The big thing is that the Ultima would be a much better pretend race car than the RXC is a pretend street car. That Quaife gearbox and the high spec motor will need a rebuild every 10,000km when driven as a street car, if you start tracking it often I'm sure that distance will come down. The SR3 needs a gearbox and engine refresh within 30-50 race hours.


Edited by CL GTR on Thursday 2nd June 13:43

Racingroj

488 posts

164 months

Thursday 2nd June 2016
quotequote all
Having owned an LS7 Ultima GTR and driven a Radical RXC Twin Turbo in the last 3 weeks I would like to add some more accurate comments on the comparison. The latest RXC has 600hp and mid 500's torque. If the Ultima was set up correctly it would still struggle to post a comparable lap time to an RXC even on slicks. When I drove the RXC at Silverstone GP 2min 16sec laps were set by another RXC on slicks, I timed it and that is an extremely competitive time.
I also drove the RXC on the road and yes it is noisey. The Quaife sequential gearbox has helical gears on the road version but you can still hear it at low speeds and in low gears. Having said that my Ultima's fuel pump was also just as noisey at low speeds and on tick over. The ride of the RXC on the road was very bit as good and comfortable as the Ultima.
On maintenance the engine, which is a 3.6 litre V6 Ford Ecoboost twin turbo out of the Ford Mustang is good for 200,000 miles of road use with normal servicing, the same applies to the gearbox. This would obviously change if the percentage of road to track use changed but that would also apply to the Ultima. The great thing about the Ultima is the low maintenance costs and its the same for the Radical. The 30-50hrs for an engine refresh on a Radical SR3 is on the race car and on the Hyabusa engine. I also had an SR3 on the road around 2005 and the maintenance was just the same as a bike and would be not 30-50hrs engine refresh.
If I was to make one final comment on the comparison it is that the Ultima is old school (not an adverse comment) and the Radical RXC new age. They are both extreme cars both on road and track.

deadscoob

2,263 posts

261 months

Friday 3rd June 2016
quotequote all
Good post Roj. The RXC is indeed very modern. Anyone that doubts or dismisses a Radical, should go out with a good driver on track in one. Corner speed, a standard Ultima just cannot compare. But that should be expected, as radicals are fairly modern race cars, first and foremost.

Edited to add, have just been on the configurator. Top engine choice on that is 454hp, specced similarly to my GTR (excluding hp) it comes in at £147k.!!

Are you getting an RXC then Roj?

Edited by deadscoob on Friday 3rd June 06:57

F.C.

3,897 posts

209 months

Friday 3rd June 2016
quotequote all
I've been watching these very carefully My hope of picking one up s/h in RHD is fading fast.

This really is the only car I may jump to in place of the Ultima.

having said that a V12 Fezza is getting ever closer. cool

ETS not as a replacement for the Ultima though

Racingroj

488 posts

164 months

Friday 3rd June 2016
quotequote all
Morning Deadscoob
The latest spec sheet is now 600hp with the new twin turbo arrangement. I'm considering one before I try a Steve Smith assisted build of the Evo.

tjlees

1,382 posts

238 months

Friday 3rd June 2016
quotequote all
deadscoob said:
Good post Roj. The RXC is indeed very modern. Anyone that doubts or dismisses a Radical, should go out with a good driver on track in one. Corner speed, a standard Ultima just cannot compare. But that should be expected, as radicals are fairly modern race cars, first and foremost.

Edited to add, have just been on the configurator. Top engine choice on that is 454hp, specced similarly to my GTR (excluding hp) it comes in at £147k.!!

Are you getting an RXC then Roj?
+vat ?

The RXC is a proper areoed car and iirc around 900kg downforce and it's corner g is around 2.5g. Basically they were lapping me every three laps - some of that is down to the driving smile but nothing else was overtaking me at the time.

- and that's really the problem with the Radicals on track imho - they are too fast and you'd be forever hitting traffic with the risk of not hitting a corner with enough speed and therefore lack of downforce equating to a possible kitty litter interface problem yikes

For me if you intend to enter a one make race series and like to occasionally drive on the road , then the radical RXC is good but expensive

If you want a nice split between a road car and track day car that will make mince meat of most hypercars that is relatively cheap, then it's the ultima for me.

845ste

577 posts

128 months

Sunday 5th June 2016
quotequote all
...but bad design irked

tjlees

1,382 posts

238 months

Sunday 5th June 2016
quotequote all
845ste said:
...but bad design irked
Which one??