Samsung v Panasonic

Author
Discussion

Kudos

Original Poster:

2,672 posts

174 months

Tuesday 18th September 2012
quotequote all
I know this is perhaps how long is apiece of string, but I'm thinking of treating myself to a new TV. Was looking at one of the Samsung series 8 TVs, but then also saw the Panasonic and I know how well they are thought of on here. Was planning on going the whole hog with 3D bluray and sound bar type affair.

So, any thought good or bad?

craigjm

17,940 posts

200 months

Tuesday 18th September 2012
quotequote all
Go somewhere where you can test the two you are looking at side by side with content you are familiar with. All you will get here really is fanboyism from one side or the other which wont really help along with maybe one person who owns / works in TV sales that will give you a balanced view. No replacement for your own test drive.

tdm34

7,366 posts

210 months

Tuesday 18th September 2012
quotequote all
just make sure wherever you do your side by side demo, that you ask them to set the light level to the same as
you watch at home if possible.

Because an overly bright environment will favour a LCD set over a plasma, but both the D8000 series and VT50 series
sets are capable of excellent results.

But I honestly think the VT50 shades it.

craigjm

17,940 posts

200 months

Tuesday 18th September 2012
quotequote all
tdm34 said:
just make sure wherever you do your side by side demo, that you ask them to set the light level to the same as
you watch at home if possible.

Because an overly bright environment will favour a LCD set over a plasma, but both the D8000 series and VT50 series
sets are capable of excellent results.

But I honestly think the VT50 shades it.
I think the deciding factor will be the other features the TV's offer in terms of SMART ability etc.

tdm34

7,366 posts

210 months

Wednesday 19th September 2012
quotequote all
craigjm said:
I think the deciding factor will be the other features the TV's offer in terms of SMART ability etc.
I find that statement amazing, whilst understanding that the "Smart" ability of the TV set is important, I always thought the most important quality of a set is its picture quality!

There are many ways of getting "smart" tech through a TV, with a PS3 being the obvious solution.

craigjm

17,940 posts

200 months

Wednesday 19th September 2012
quotequote all
tdm34 said:
I find that statement amazing, whilst understanding that the "Smart" ability of the TV set is important, I always thought the most important quality of a set is its picture quality!

There are many ways of getting "smart" tech through a TV, with a PS3 being the obvious solution.
Indeed, what I meant was that he will probably conclude that the picture and sound quality are extremely similar once he has tested both so his decision may come down to other things. With some people it may even come down to the design of the damn case!

maxfan

1,622 posts

143 months

Thursday 20th September 2012
quotequote all
Cai I just say your original post in this is one of the truist (?) things written

IforB

9,840 posts

229 months

Thursday 20th September 2012
quotequote all
Both are excellent and you won't be unhappy with either. I tried both and went for the Panny as I preferred the fast motion handling, but there was naff all in it really.

Both have got some excellent features.

There's no right or wrong answer to this one really, you just might mildly prefer one to the other for some inexplicable reason.

nando

48 posts

143 months

Thursday 20th September 2012
quotequote all
I prefer LG. Cheaper, nearly as good, and both mine work faultlessly.

vx220

2,689 posts

234 months

Friday 21st September 2012
quotequote all
Panasonic for plasma
But Samsung for led
During quiet times we've had both side by side
Samsung led much better for motion handling than Panasonic led
If not a gamer then Panasonic plasma

Dave Dax builder

662 posts

259 months

Saturday 22nd September 2012
quotequote all
Just make sure you get it from somewhere that throws in a free 5 year warranty!
I have a 55" LED Samsung that is almost 2 years old and the top corner of the screen is now going off colour.
Samsung say they won't fix it as it's out of warranty, this set was £2300 when I bought it.
12 months warranty is not really good enough for something that is (by the selling price) a "Premium product".


vx220

2,689 posts

234 months

Saturday 22nd September 2012
quotequote all
Our local independent does a free five year warranty
Worthless on a led/plasma as most faults can't be repaired and the free warranties seem to be parts and labour
...and get it in writing, these guys won't

marcosgt

11,018 posts

176 months

Saturday 22nd September 2012
quotequote all
Panasonic then smile

Must admit, of all the tech I've ever bought, my Panasonic plasma TV (only a 37") is one of the few things that nearly every day makes me glad I picked it.

Great picture quality on HD and SD signals.

M.

craigjm

17,940 posts

200 months

Saturday 22nd September 2012
quotequote all
vx220 said:
Our local independent does a free five year warranty
Worthless on a led/plasma as most faults can't be repaired and the free warranties seem to be parts and labour
...and get it in writing, these guys won't
The John Lewis free 5 year guarantees are pretty good

http://www.johnlewis.com/Help/Help.aspx?HelpId=9#g...

madcaplaughs

25 posts

182 months

Saturday 22nd September 2012
quotequote all
The Samsung led is brighter than the plasma Panasonic but the motion handling of the plasma is far superior. Picture quality is excellent on both but again the Panasonic is superior and has the THX award for superlative picture quality. Both sets are smart tvs and offer similar software, so go for the Panasonic it's worth the extra money.

vx220

2,689 posts

234 months

Sunday 23rd September 2012
quotequote all
I would definitely have pana plasma over sams led
If you play games grab the led
If you get the pana use a sound bar or home cinema but with most samsungs you can simply plug one of the Bose companions into the headphone sockets, sounds loads better than any similarly priced home cinemas
But don't do this with Panasonic as they have a strange logic to their volume controls

tdm34

7,366 posts

210 months

Monday 24th September 2012
quotequote all
Will people stop calling the Samsung set an LED, because its not!
it's an LCD set thats light source is an array of LEDs behind the screen.

Panasonics volume system shows a degree of intelligence, because the headphone socket
has its own volume control in the sound menu, primarily for people who are hard of hearing but have other people who view the set that aren't, if you connect anything to the headphone socket of most sets it cuts out the sound to the sets main speakers, with the Panasonic you can have the main speakers on at whatever volume you require and a set of headphones at a completely differant volume.

henrycrun

2,449 posts

240 months

Thursday 27th September 2012
quotequote all
Has anyone been able to try out a TV remote control for themselves in John Lewis ?
I'd like to be able to go through the menus for the wife who can be a bit cack handed with little buttons

craigjm

17,940 posts

200 months

Thursday 27th September 2012
quotequote all
henrycrun said:
Has anyone been able to try out a TV remote control for themselves in John Lewis ?
I'd like to be able to go through the menus for the wife who can be a bit cack handed with little buttons
Yeah I have done that. I wanted to look around the SMART features and menu systems as part of my choice of new TV and they did allow that. One thing it made me realise is that no matter how good the Samsung TV's are the remotes are very cheap feeling.

Oakey

27,561 posts

216 months

Thursday 27th September 2012
quotequote all
Dave Dax builder said:
Just make sure you get it from somewhere that throws in a free 5 year warranty!
I have a 55" LED Samsung that is almost 2 years old and the top corner of the screen is now going off colour.
Samsung say they won't fix it as it's out of warranty, this set was £2300 when I bought it.
12 months warranty is not really good enough for something that is (by the selling price) a "Premium product".
Sales of Goods Act? Aren't expensive items supposed to last for a reasonable amount of time? I think a court would agree something that cost £2300 should last longer than 2 years!