Skyq

Author
Discussion

_dobbo_

14,387 posts

249 months

Friday 1st April 2016
quotequote all
Tycho said:
Pressing the Sky logo will take you directly to your recordings. HTH
Yeah sorry I remembered that the engineer had shown that particular feature to me - I had forgotten.

I was more referring to when in your planner, the grid view with the pictures and the layout in general seems harder to navigate. Basically, I hate the pictures!

Tycho

11,633 posts

274 months

Friday 1st April 2016
quotequote all
_dobbo_ said:
Tycho said:
Pressing the Sky logo will take you directly to your recordings. HTH
Yeah sorry I remembered that the engineer had shown that particular feature to me - I had forgotten.

I was more referring to when in your planner, the grid view with the pictures and the layout in general seems harder to navigate. Basically, I hate the pictures!
Yes it can be a little slower to find stuff particularly when the planner is very full but I sometimes use the A-Z listings which makes it a little easier.

Trax

1,537 posts

233 months

Friday 1st April 2016
quotequote all
Anybody have any update on if moving to Sky Q loses the F1 we get through the legacy HD pack I am on?

Looking online they want £99 for box, £50 for install, and my monthly payments go up by £17.75 (£19.75 from June)

I have, When looking at my online account:
Variety
Sky 3D
Sky Sports F1
Skt+HD box
Sky+HS box
HD Pack
These cost £47.50 (reduced by £11.25 offer at the mo)

Sky Fibre Unlimted £20 (reduced by £10 offer at the mo)

Sky talk evenings £4

Sky Line Rental £17.40

So total current cost £82.65 (£67.65 with offers)


Under what you've added (if I add Q online) it says

Sky Q Silver TV
Sky Q bundle
Sky Q silver bundle all at £54

Do these replace the packages above?

The New monthly costs is £85.40 so current pack plus £17.75 so were does the £54 fit in?

How are people only paying a few £ extra a month?

Would really like it, but its going to be £20 per month extra> I only recently removed movies and multiroom recenlty (and got some offers) to reduce costs, so I will gain multiroom function through Mini box, but with an additional £8 per month for the Q experience.

Anybody have any advice on a cheaper way to do it, and if I would keep F1 without adding sports?

Digitalize

2,850 posts

136 months

Friday 1st April 2016
quotequote all
It was only £1.50 extra for us because we had every package and multiroom.

As your HD package is changing, I can't see how you won't lose Sky F1 on the HD pack. Doesn't matter to us as we have Sky Sports anyway.

MissChief

7,114 posts

169 months

Friday 1st April 2016
quotequote all
It's been confirmed many times that the f1 will stay without Sports if you have Legacy HD Pack. If they weren't going to use this as an excuse to get rid of it I'd imagine it will stay for a while yet.

Trustmeimadoctor

12,637 posts

156 months

Friday 1st April 2016
quotequote all
Anyone else have an issue with recordings not playing audio? If you stop start rewind quit etc it will start playing with sound other time it just works fine though

Trax

1,537 posts

233 months

Friday 1st April 2016
quotequote all
MissChief said:
It's been confirmed many times that the f1 will stay without Sports if you have Legacy HD Pack. If they weren't going to use this as an excuse to get rid of it I'd imagine it will stay for a while yet.
But is it not the case that my current packs, ie variety, hd, sky3d etc will be replaced by the q bundle, q silver bundle stuff?

Or do I keep all my existing packages?

MissChief

7,114 posts

169 months

Saturday 2nd April 2016
quotequote all
Trax said:
MissChief said:
It's been confirmed many times that the f1 will stay without Sports if you have Legacy HD Pack. If they weren't going to use this as an excuse to get rid of it I'd imagine it will stay for a while yet.
But is it not the case that my current packs, ie variety, hd, sky3d etc will be replaced by the q bundle, q silver bundle stuff?

Or do I keep all my existing packages?
That's true, but the Legacy F1 entitlement remains so you don't need Sports to get the F1 in HD.

AndyDubbya

948 posts

285 months

Saturday 2nd April 2016
quotequote all
Trustmeimadoctor said:
Anyone else have an issue with recordings not playing audio? If you stop start rewind quit etc it will start playing with sound other time it just works fine though
Not quite the same but possibly related, the audio's occasionally out of sync, also fixed with a quick rewind/play. It hasn't been frequent enough to raise with Sky yet, though.

colonel c

7,890 posts

240 months

Saturday 2nd April 2016
quotequote all
MissChief said:
Trax said:
MissChief said:
It's been confirmed many times that the f1 will stay without Sports if you have Legacy HD Pack. If they weren't going to use this as an excuse to get rid of it I'd imagine it will stay for a while yet.
But is it not the case that my current packs, ie variety, hd, sky3d etc will be replaced by the q bundle, q silver bundle stuff?

Or do I keep all my existing packages?
That's true, but the Legacy F1 entitlement remains so you don't need Sports to get the F1 in HD.
http://helpforum.sky.com/t5/Sky-Q/SkyQ-and-Sky-F1-HD-Legacy-entitlement/td-p/2414139



jamoor

14,506 posts

216 months

Saturday 2nd April 2016
quotequote all
I can't believe people are paying hundreds of pounds a month to subscribe to a TV channel that forces you to watch adverts every 15 minutes. Where do you guys see the value in this?

colonel c

7,890 posts

240 months

Saturday 2nd April 2016
quotequote all
jamoor said:
I can't believe people are paying hundreds of pounds a month to subscribe to a TV channel that forces you to watch adverts every 15 minutes. Where do you guys see the value in this?
OK I'll bite. I mostly prerecord programs to watch as and when it's convenient for me. The SKY HD box is ideal for that purpose and I expect the SKY Q system will add more flexibility to that. Having recorded programs I'm able to FF through ads and also stop watching to attend to other activities and then resume later. The only sport I follow is F1 and SKY currently have the best coverage.

So the value for me is that with very few exceptions, I can watch what I want, when I want and in which room I want.
Although 'hundreds of pounds a month' is a bit of an exaggeration, SKY is still expensive and depending on one's requirements that may or may not be good value for money.
Then again, how many PHs pay way over the odds to buy and run fast or interesting cars, when a modest family hatchback would do the job much more efficiently.

_dobbo_

14,387 posts

249 months

Saturday 2nd April 2016
quotequote all
Agree with the above. Convenience, variety, flexibility, ease of use.

Nobody is paying hundreds of pounds a month. About the most you can possibly spend is £130 and few people will have a package of that size.

Several of the items (phone, broadband) aren't unique to sky. So maybe £80 a month for a top level subscriber, much less if you don't have movies and sports.

A decent DVR is about £300 and that will be limited to freeiview. So if you buy one of those you're paying £25 a month for that for the first year. PLus phone and broadband - so more like £55 - £60 a month.

Doesn't seem that expensive compared to that for all the additional content, if you ask me.




FiF

44,140 posts

252 months

Saturday 2nd April 2016
quotequote all
Good posts above answering the why Sky question.

It certainly makes the job of watching what you want, ignoring ads and all the between programme fluff very easy. The one thing that still really irritates me, and it's not Sky's fault but that of the BBC is that it's so easy to store up episodes in a series to catch at a later and more convenient time then easy to forget how I player works means that recorded BBC programs obtained from catch up are automatically deleted after a relatively short time. For example started recording the Night Manager, few episodes in the bag and go to watch finding that episode 1 now deleted. Have to wait for the rerun.

But if you do record it on Sky from the live broadcast it's kept longer, so in effect it's a better service than the BBC in thus way.

The other issue is that for some reason we have very few Freeview channels, so it's either still putting up a dish and going for FreeSat or Sky, such is life in the sticks.

_dobbo_

14,387 posts

249 months

Saturday 2nd April 2016
quotequote all
Fiddling around, switched both my boxes over to 1080p today. Seems to me the picture is better, anyone else done the same?


jamoor

14,506 posts

216 months

Saturday 2nd April 2016
quotequote all
colonel c said:
OK I'll bite. I mostly prerecord programs to watch as and when it's convenient for me. The SKY HD box is ideal for that purpose and I expect the SKY Q system will add more flexibility to that. Having recorded programs I'm able to FF through ads and also stop watching to attend to other activities and then resume later. The only sport I follow is F1 and SKY currently have the best coverage.

So the value for me is that with very few exceptions, I can watch what I want, when I want and in which room I want.
Although 'hundreds of pounds a month' is a bit of an exaggeration, SKY is still expensive and depending on one's requirements that may or may not be good value for money.
Then again, how many PHs pay way over the odds to buy and run fast or interesting cars, when a modest family hatchback would do the job much more efficiently.
Well I don't watch alot of TV but stuff is on Netflix/Prime/iPlayer/Even download it.

Netflix at less than £10 and can be watched by 2 people in different countries/cities.

Also, streaming TV through a satellite dish that's attached to your house just seems so old fashioned to me. Why do they insist on broadcast > record to a hard drive when netflix have it on a server for you to watch whenever? I can't be the only one thinking this is an extremely old fashioned method?

Digitalize

2,850 posts

136 months

Sunday 3rd April 2016
quotequote all
It is old fashioned, but then you can also download a lot of it, which without Sky you wouldn't have access to.

The reality is until you can easily download everything that you actually want to watch, and that is current, similar to Netflix, Sky is the best option.

Adverts will play a big part of that too, which is one issue.

MissChief

7,114 posts

169 months

Sunday 3rd April 2016
quotequote all
_dobbo_ said:
Fiddling around, switched both my boxes over to 1080p today. Seems to me the picture is better, anyone else done the same?
Yes. And I agree the picture at least seems better. My 49" LG 4k set certainly gives a better picture with a 1080p input rather than a 1080i one.

Digitalize

2,850 posts

136 months

Sunday 3rd April 2016
quotequote all
For those that aren't aware, changing the box to 1080p doesn't mean you're getting a 1080p feed, as Sky broadcast HD content at 1080i. It just means the box is upscaling it rather than your TV, and that it is doing a better job than your TV.

_dobbo_

14,387 posts

249 months

Monday 4th April 2016
quotequote all
Another question from me - is there a shortcut to delete stuff? Used to be press yellow. Now it's select, right, right, delete. Cumbersome...

Digitalize said:
For those that aren't aware, changing the box to 1080p doesn't mean you're getting a 1080p feed, as Sky broadcast HD content at 1080i. It just means the box is upscaling it rather than your TV, and that it is doing a better job than your TV.
That was my next question, whether Sky are actually broadcasting in 1080p yet. I wouldn't have bet that it wasn't just me convincing myself that it looks better but subjective view is all I've got when it comes to looking with my eyes!