55" OLED or 65" LED TV...

Author
Discussion

jmorgan

36,010 posts

285 months

Wednesday 17th May 2017
quotequote all
Mine has the store or home in the settings.

Gettoff

1,434 posts

208 months

Wednesday 24th May 2017
quotequote all
Afternoon all, I was wondering if the current thinking has changed much regarding what's recommended in the sub £1500 sector at the moment?

My current Panasonic plasma 55VT30B has recently gone pop and I'm looking at a replacement, most likely a 55" or 58". I'm off to have a look round some of the local stores later and current models on the shortlist for closer inspection are LG 55B6V and Panasonic 58DX902B. I don't mind spending less, especially if the set will be underused in terms of what I'm watching most frequently - currently mostly just SKY HD with the occasional BR DVD.

Any thoughts or advice welcome, thank you.

varsas

4,014 posts

203 months

Wednesday 24th May 2017
quotequote all
Gettoff said:
Afternoon all, I was wondering if the current thinking has changed much regarding what's recommended in the sub £1500 sector at the moment?

My current Panasonic plasma 55VT30B has recently gone pop and I'm looking at a replacement, most likely a 55" or 58". I'm off to have a look round some of the local stores later and current models on the shortlist for closer inspection are LG 55B6V and Panasonic 58DX902B. I don't mind spending less, especially if the set will be underused in terms of what I'm watching most frequently - currently mostly just SKY HD with the occasional BR DVD.

Any thoughts or advice welcome, thank you.
Take a look at the OLED. It'll either blow you away (in which case you won't want anything else) or you won't be able to see what the fuss is about. if you can't see the difference in the OLED you can very safely spend a lot less on a decent LED, the Panasonic you have linked is well regarded.

DX902 review:

https://www.avforums.com/review/panasonic-tx-58-dx...

You might need to be quick with the B6, it's being replaced very soon (so it's at a good price right now).

gizlaroc

17,251 posts

225 months

Thursday 25th May 2017
quotequote all
So is the DX902B.

£1199 including vat at Costco, in store only though.

hab1966

1,097 posts

213 months

Thursday 25th May 2017
quotequote all
gizlaroc said:
So is the DX902B.

£1199 including vat at Costco, in store only though.
Richer Sounds 'should' price beat this. I say 'should' as i spoke to my local store and RS phone sales who both refused stating Costco wasnt somebody they would match against due to its membership. However, through a post on AVForums, i recently learnt that the RS terms state that Costco can be used (https://www.richersounds.com/information/pricebeat) or maybe its been updated since i asked in April.

In the end i just went to Costco, joined up and bought the set and am very pleased with it.

Steve Evil

10,662 posts

230 months

Thursday 25th May 2017
quotequote all
hab1966 said:
Richer Sounds 'should' price beat this. I say 'should' as i spoke to my local store and RS phone sales who both refused stating Costco wasnt somebody they would match against due to its membership. However, through a post on AVForums, i recently learnt that the RS terms state that Costco can be used (https://www.richersounds.com/information/pricebeat) or maybe its been updated since i asked in April.

In the end i just went to Costco, joined up and bought the set and am very pleased with it.
My local RS (Milton Keynes) said they wouldn't price-match Costco because they don't offer an equivalent guarantee. Couldn't find stock of it in the Milton Keynes Costco anyway.

Used to really rate RS, but the last few times I've been in there they've been unwilling to budge and don't seem to offer the level of service they pride themselves on. I'm sure it varies from store to store.

anonymous-user

55 months

Thursday 25th May 2017
quotequote all
Even at £1499 (in John Lewis and RS) it's a bit of a bargain.

I'm not in the market for a new TV until next year, but at that price I am so tempted.

kmpowell

2,930 posts

229 months

Thursday 25th May 2017
quotequote all
I did wonder if my comments re the B6 might get a bit of "wtf" attention, and I was right.

All the reviews I read said the XD93 trumped for brightness, natural colours, and most importantly upscaling. The XD93 had the best upscaling ability of pretty much any panel on sale. Add on to this the motionflow and I was sold.

It's pretty irrelevant now because the XD93 can't really be found in many places, but as said, I chose the XD93 over the B6 for those reasons.

Gettoff

1,434 posts

208 months

Thursday 25th May 2017
quotequote all
Thanks for the replies chaps. After having a look in store and reading a few more online reviews I've decided on the 58DX902B. It won't arrive until next week but I got it for about £1275 which I was happy enough with. Hopefully this one lasts a bit longer than the last one thumbup

varsas

4,014 posts

203 months

Friday 26th May 2017
quotequote all
kmpowell said:
I did wonder if my comments re the B6 might get a bit of "wtf" attention, and I was right.

All the reviews I read said the XD93 trumped for brightness, natural colours, and most importantly upscaling. The XD93 had the best upscaling ability of pretty much any panel on sale. Add on to this the motionflow and I was sold.

It's pretty irrelevant now because the XD93 can't really be found in many places, but as said, I chose the XD93 over the B6 for those reasons.
Each to their own. As I've said a few times, the first time I saw an OLED it just blew me away like no other display I've ever seen. Once I saw one I knew I wouldn't be buying an LCD, but if OLED doesn't affect you like that then you can save yourself a lot of money. I know people in both camps.

anonymous-user

55 months

Friday 26th May 2017
quotequote all
I'm a massive Samsung LED/LCD fan. Last 3 sets have been Samsung and I've been very happy with them and I still am with my latest. They give a huge amount for the money imo.

That said, the LG OLED does have a better picture; I've just never wanted to spend the extra. I think next year though all that will change and I will have to bite the bullet and go OLED.

At the end of the day it is horses for courses, and budgets and uses, but there is no doubt in my mind that OLED is better if your budget is not a constraint.


kmpowell

2,930 posts

229 months

Friday 26th May 2017
quotequote all
garyhun said:
but there is no doubt in my mind that OLED is better if your budget is not a constraint.
High-end OLED, I agree. But as above, I'm of the opinion that avery high-end LCD/LED currently outperforms a low end OLED in many areas that are important e.g upscaling, motion and brightness.

anonymous-user

55 months

Friday 26th May 2017
quotequote all
kmpowell said:
garyhun said:
but there is no doubt in my mind that OLED is better if your budget is not a constraint.
High-end OLED, I agree. But as above, I'm of the opinion that avery high-end LCD/LED currently outperforms a low end OLED in many areas that are important e.g upscaling, motion and brightness.
Would you consider the LG B6 as high end? If so then I agree with what you're saying.

Edit due to hitting submit prematurely!

Edited by anonymous-user on Friday 26th May 10:53

kmpowell

2,930 posts

229 months

Friday 26th May 2017
quotequote all
garyhun said:
Would you consider the LG B6 as high end?
Nope I class the B6 as low-end OLED. Their E6 is high-end, the picture on the E6 is significantly (especially brighter) better then the B6 IMO.

Funk

26,300 posts

210 months

Friday 26th May 2017
quotequote all
kmpowell said:
I did wonder if my comments re the B6 might get a bit of "wtf" attention, and I was right.

All the reviews I read said the XD93 trumped for brightness, natural colours, and most importantly upscaling. The XD93 had the best upscaling ability of pretty much any panel on sale. Add on to this the motionflow and I was sold.

It's pretty irrelevant now because the XD93 can't really be found in many places, but as said, I chose the XD93 over the B6 for those reasons.
You're not alone - I did the same.

Still really pleased with my XD93 but almost wishing I'd stretched to the 65"!

anonymous-user

55 months

Friday 26th May 2017
quotequote all
kmpowell said:
garyhun said:
Would you consider the LG B6 as high end?
Nope I class the B6 as low-end OLED. Their E6 is high-end, the picture on the E6 is significantly (especially brighter) better then the B6 IMO.
Interesting. I need to explore more.

legzr1

3,848 posts

140 months

Friday 26th May 2017
quotequote all
varsas said:
Each to their own. As I've said a few times, the first time I saw an OLED it just blew me away like no other display I've ever seen. Once I saw one I knew I wouldn't be buying an LCD, but if OLED doesn't affect you like that then you can save yourself a lot of money. I know people in both camps.
Agreed.

If all your viewing and sources are SD or 1080i HD you're probably better off with LCD where insane, eye bleeding brightness and decent upsampling can make up for the ropey resolution.

However, 4K HDR from UHD disc or streamed from Netflix, Amazon, YouTube etc can make for epic viewing.

Personally I've never been 'that' impressed with LCD so moved from Plasma straight to OLED a while back.
Unless things change dramatically my next set will be another OLED too.

I also like the fact that the whole 65" set weighs less than the power supply for the plasma wink

Digitalize

2,850 posts

136 months

Friday 26th May 2017
quotequote all
Probably light years ahead of the Plasma for response times.

varsas

4,014 posts

203 months

Friday 26th May 2017
quotequote all
DDg said:
I've been thinking about oled's for 18 months now, but just can't stomach the price for a 65"er.

So, Panasonic 65DX902B (last years top-of-the-range FALD model) is up for £2k (minus 5%) at John Lewis. Apart from a slight reservation on viewing angles, I wonder if a 37ms response time will hamper my BF1 game playing. Anyone hazard a guess on how it compares to my 10 year old 42" Panny plasma? Thanks.
Does this help?

http://www.hdtvtest.co.uk/news/input-lag

Generally, Plasma is better than LCD for gaming though LCD's have got a lot better lately. 37ms is fairly low, shouldn't be noticable.


anonymous-user

55 months

Friday 26th May 2017
quotequote all
I wish I hadn't taken a look at the LG site. The W7 looks awesome! (yes, I know it's £8000)

http://www.lg.com/uk/lgoled/01_SIGNATURE.html#Awar...