New LCD TV - why is picture so bad?

New LCD TV - why is picture so bad?

Author
Discussion

Ray Singh

Original Poster:

3,048 posts

231 months

Friday 16th April 2010
quotequote all
True - When i sit in my sofas the picture is acceptable. When i am close to the tv the picture is bad.

I tried a freinds Humax fox+ box today. Picture quality is infinitly better with this, but i loose channels that i get with Sky.....


Mr2Mike

20,143 posts

256 months

Friday 16th April 2010
quotequote all
The main problem is that the quality of most of Skys standard def channels is very poor. A CRT hides a lot of digital compression artefacts where decent LCD/Plasma TVs show them in all their gory detail. Either put up with it (and it does get less distracting after a while) or shell out for a Sky HD box + subscription (or one of the Freesat HD equivalents if you don't mind a rather more limited channel selection), or HD cable if available.

declasm

426 posts

195 months

Wednesday 21st April 2010
quotequote all
I bought an LG LH3000 1080P LCD - so not the 100Hz model but not far away from it. I have to say that the SD picture quality really was excellent through a standard Sky box but the caveat is that you need to put some time and effort into manually adjusting the settings.

There are exhaustive threads on avforums about your specific model and what settings to use which you can search but initially ensure that your Sky box is outputting RGB and 16:9 and that your scart cable has all the RGB pins, then make sure the scart cable is plugged into the F(ull) scart socket on the back of the TV. Set the aspect ratio on the TV to 16:9 then try using the picture wizard to get a good picture baseline. Turn off 100Hz, dynamic contrast etc. then manually adjust brightness and backlight and sharpness right down (somehwere around 30%) and increase the contrast to get good black blacks. Colour can be adjusted to preference I like something around 60% (a bit hyperreal) after a little playing around you'll have it looking good!

Toffer

1,527 posts

262 months

Wednesday 21st April 2010
quotequote all
Really sorry, but this is not a choice TV. Can you get a copy of a consumer magazine, choose a better TV and get a refund for the one you have...I don't think you will ever be happy with it. Unfortunately, Richer Sounds does have a bit of a reputation for getting those products, often from good manufacturers, that are the "lemon" of the range...and sell them off cheap!

dalos260

199 posts

182 months

Wednesday 21st April 2010
quotequote all
Toffer said:
Really sorry, but this is not a choice TV. Can you get a copy of a consumer magazine, choose a better TV and get a refund for the one you have...I don't think you will ever be happy with it. Unfortunately, Richer Sounds does have a bit of a reputation for getting those products, often from good manufacturers, that are the "lemon" of the range...and sell them off cheap!
laugh

Yeah, because consumer magazines give completely impartial advice, don't they?


Ray Singh

Original Poster:

3,048 posts

231 months

Wednesday 21st April 2010
quotequote all
I appreciate it might not be the best tv in the world, but for me and my use it fits my needs and my budget.
I was hoping for a better picture quality thats all.

I have tried a Humax freesat box now (borrowed from a freind) and the picture with that is excellent.