Prometheus - Ridley Scott's 'Alien Prequel' (or not)...

Prometheus - Ridley Scott's 'Alien Prequel' (or not)...

Author
Discussion

MartG

20,678 posts

204 months

Thursday 2nd March 2017
quotequote all


smile

p1stonhead

25,549 posts

167 months

Thursday 2nd March 2017
quotequote all
MartG said:


smile
Aliens v Idiots is spot on for Prometheus laugh

Guvernator

13,156 posts

165 months

Thursday 2nd March 2017
quotequote all
p1stonhead said:
MartG said:


smile
Aliens v Idiots is spot on for Prometheus laugh
yes


Aliens vs Couples is also genius. I thought to myself they are gonna get chewed! But then I remembered what my lovely OH is like when it's blob week and had to reconsider, catch those couples at the wrong time of the month and the Xenomorphs don't stand a fkin chance. wink

P-Jay

10,565 posts

191 months

Thursday 2nd March 2017
quotequote all
Mr Snrub said:
DamienB said:
Simple, Alien 5 had some hope of being any good. Alien Covenant is practically guaranteed to be a glossy steaming turd.
Blomkamp's last few films have been critically panned though, so maybe it's for the best

"last few" he's only made 3 ha ha.

I think if he avoids the use of bloody awful South African rappers he'll be okay. That might be the source of his problems, I suspect he’d want to film in SA, using lots of SA actors and that might be a sticking point for the backers.

I thought his dirty style would be great for an Aliens sequel, and ignoring 3 would give him all the room he needed to make a great Alien film...

Saying that, I still say "how could you fk this up?!" every time I've seen a film featuring the Alien since Aliens, for a franchise that seems to the layman unfkupable, it's had a lot more misses than hits.

Guvernator

13,156 posts

165 months

Thursday 2nd March 2017
quotequote all
P-Jay said:
Saying that, I still say "how could you fk this up?!" every time I've seen a film featuring the Alien since Aliens, for a franchise that seems to the layman unfkupable, it's had a lot more misses than hits.
Right with you on this one, I'm not a filmaker but it really does seem like it should be easier to make a good Alien film then a bad one and yet we've had countless horrible Alien and AvP films, Prometheus probably being the most shocking of the lot.

When I first heard about it I was like wow a prequel to one of my favourite movies with Aliens, Space Jockies and Ridley Scott, this is going to be the best film ever made without even breaking a sweat.......OH. How do you mix those fantastic ingredients and still get something so wrong?

Mr Snrub

24,980 posts

227 months

Thursday 2nd March 2017
quotequote all
P-Jay said:
Mr Snrub said:
DamienB said:
Simple, Alien 5 had some hope of being any good. Alien Covenant is practically guaranteed to be a glossy steaming turd.
Blomkamp's last few films have been critically panned though, so maybe it's for the best

"last few" he's only made 3 ha ha.
And having two of those panned (although I didn't think Elysium was that bad, not seen Chappie) isn't overly promising. Maybe he's one of those directors who work better with a smaller budget

RemyMartin81D

6,759 posts

205 months

Thursday 2nd March 2017
quotequote all
Not sure why people have a hard on for slating alien 3 given the alien franchise it's a bloody solid film.


Bullett

10,886 posts

184 months

Thursday 2nd March 2017
quotequote all
I like Alien3 but it's not a patch on the previous two.

If it had been a standalone movie I think it would have been better received. Good setting and visuals, good characters.
It had the added problem that it was killed the same way as T2 so looked like a copy cat kill the unkillable monster ending.

Halb

53,012 posts

183 months

Thursday 2nd March 2017
quotequote all
Guvernator said:
Right with you on this one, I'm not a filmaker but it really does seem like it should be easier to make a good Alien film then a bad one and yet we've had countless horrible Alien and AvP films, Prometheus probably being the most shocking of the lot.
I actually think it's far easier to make a terrible alien film, and quite a tricky path now to make a good one. It's so easy to be lazy. There's a reason that ALien and ALiens are classics. The first was made by an advert bloke and is a classic simple horror story, with stuff that made the genre/cliche. The second was a sequel which was made by a top film-maker at the zenith of his creative output. Back then it was still all raw. By the time the third came around it had become a thing, these days called a franchise. I recall all the stty stuff they tried in the comics and the toys. And then there was ALien³ which was film by committee and forgetting everything about story, character and pace and going for cheap gimmicks to make it 'new', and it's been the same ever since. As long as it's seen as a cash cow franchise they'll suck.

Moonhawk

10,730 posts

219 months

Thursday 2nd March 2017
quotequote all
RemyMartin81D said:
Not sure why people have a hard on for slating alien 3 given the alien franchise it's a bloody solid film.
The biggest problem for Alien 3 was coming off the back of Aliens.

Plus the fact that the theatrical release was full of holes - holes that were thankfully plugged in the later special edition. The SE is a much better movie.

slartibartfast

4,014 posts

201 months

Thursday 2nd March 2017
quotequote all
a few weeks back I bought the bluray quadrilogy box set!

Alien in bluray is an even better film than the original I saw on VHS and then DVD, so much more to see and so very well filmed when you can see it for what it really is.

Aliens in bluray is odd...not sure what media James Cameron used to film it but it didn't convert to bluray very well, quite a few out of focus scenes and something just not right.
same goes for Alien 3 and Alien Resurrection.


Frimley111R

15,663 posts

234 months

Friday 3rd March 2017
quotequote all
Moonhawk said:
The biggest problem for Alien 3 was coming off the back of Aliens.
Agree, you had the scary monster no-one saw and so it was all tense and then you barely saw it at the end. In the second one it was 'Wow, look at it! And there's tons of them.' After that it was more of the same.

I like the AvP idea (loved that film!) and Prometheus which both had new and creative ideas but the second AvP was dire, clearly with no budget and Prometheus looks like the idea has died a death. I loved this 'engineer' idea and they could have done so much more with it.

anonymous-user

54 months

Friday 3rd March 2017
quotequote all
Frimley111R said:
Agree, you had the scary monster no-one saw and so it was all tense and then you barely saw it at the end. In the second one it was 'Wow, look at it! And there's tons of them.' After that it was more of the same.

I like the AvP idea (loved that film!) and Prometheus which both had new and creative ideas but the second AvP was dire, clearly with no budget and Prometheus looks like the idea has died a death. I loved this 'engineer' idea and they could have done so much more with it.
That pretty much sums it up for me.

popeyewhite

19,876 posts

120 months

Friday 3rd March 2017
quotequote all
slartibartfast said:
Aliens in bluray is odd...not sure what media James Cameron used to film it but it didn't convert to bluray very well, quite a few out of focus scenes and something just not right.

Unfortunately the hi-def also reveals the flimsiness of the cardboard sets!



Boring_Chris

2,348 posts

122 months

Friday 3rd March 2017
quotequote all
slartibartfast said:
a few weeks back I bought the bluray quadrilogy box set!

Alien in bluray is an even better film than the original I saw on VHS and then DVD, so much more to see and so very well filmed when you can see it for what it really is.

Aliens in bluray is odd...not sure what media James Cameron used to film it but it didn't convert to bluray very well, quite a few out of focus scenes and something just not right.
same goes for Alien 3 and Alien Resurrection.

I went on a film camera / stock binge read a little while ago and yeah, they used an unpopular camera / film. Predator is similar (I seem to recall that John McTiernan took huff with the studio when they forced the cameras on him!)

If you're are all interested, I found this site a bit of a nerds dream!

https://shotonwhat.com/aliens-1986

But yeah, some of the backgrounds don't hold up on Bluray. I'm watching on a projector and that really shows up some of the dodgy effects! But I'll forgive it because the aspect ratio takes up the whole screen (no black bars top and bottom) and because its still absolutely brilliant!

Halb

53,012 posts

183 months

Friday 3rd March 2017
quotequote all
It also has Shockwave in the lab.

P-Jay

10,565 posts

191 months

Monday 6th March 2017
quotequote all
A lot of films made in the 80s look pretty rough on BluRay. I seem to recall reading Cinema was really in the decline in favour of home viewing and obviously VHS quality was ropey at best (by todays standards) so why blow the budget on great filmstock.

Bladerunner looked crap on Bluray too, but I think they've made a remastered better version since and it looks great now.

Frimley111R

15,663 posts

234 months

Friday 10th March 2017
quotequote all
Yep, cinema in the 80s was pretty dead and only picked up at the tail end of the decade with big multiplexes. Up to that point they'd mostly been very old cinemas dating back decades.

ChocolateFrog

25,344 posts

173 months

Saturday 11th March 2017
quotequote all
IIRC Aliens 3 was significantly watered down from the original ideas/concept, wasn't the idea originally for it to be set on a wooden planet?. It was close to being a great film.

Prometheus was made terrible by the totally retarded characters.

southendpier

5,261 posts

229 months

Saturday 11th March 2017
quotequote all
ChocolateFrog said:
IIRC Aliens 3 was significantly watered down from the original ideas/concept, wasn't the idea originally for it to be set on a wooden planet?. It was close to being a great film.

Prometheus was made terrible by the totally retarded characters.
Wooden planet occupied by monks iirc. They kept the no weapons thing and moved to a prison because of cost