Motorway Cops - BBC1 now

Author
Discussion

Legacywr

12,127 posts

188 months

Thursday 4th February 2016
quotequote all
He did die!

DoubleSix

11,715 posts

176 months

Thursday 4th February 2016
quotequote all
Legacywr said:
He did die!
Read the post.

DoubleSix

11,715 posts

176 months

Friday 5th February 2016
quotequote all
And I agree with defblade.

The speed element was the only thing that allowed that lady to avoid a conviction.


Legacywr

12,127 posts

188 months

Friday 5th February 2016
quotequote all
DoubleSix said:
Legacywr said:
He did die!
Read the post.
I thought I did?

DoubleSix

11,715 posts

176 months

Friday 5th February 2016
quotequote all
Legacywr said:
DoubleSix said:
Legacywr said:
He did die!
Read the post.
I thought I did?
And she 'thought' she'd looked.

Legacywr

12,127 posts

188 months

Friday 5th February 2016
quotequote all
DoubleSix said:
And I agree with defblade.

The speed element was the only thing that allowed that lady to avoid a conviction.
Agreed! We all know she will live with that for the rest of her life!

Punishment enough, but, to prosecute her was the right thing to do!

DoubleSix

11,715 posts

176 months

Friday 5th February 2016
quotequote all
Legacywr said:
DoubleSix said:
And I agree with defblade.

The speed element was the only thing that allowed that lady to avoid a conviction.
Agreed! We all know she will live with that for the rest of her life!

Punishment enough, but, to prosecute her was the right thing to do!
It actually made me quite angry.

Some poor guy has lost his life because some impatient bint has decided to pull a U turn on a fast (NSL) main road.

The 'witnesses' accounts of biker going fast also leave me uncomfortable as we all know people flash lights abd wring fists at even sensible overtakes - do it on something fruity and you are instantly a "bloody mad man".

I'd imagine the average (ie not very good) driver would look at a bike going past at 65mph and judge it wreckless!!

Charlie1986

2,017 posts

135 months

Friday 5th February 2016
quotequote all
So a biker doing over 60mph passing stationary cars on a road that is blocked further up the road is ok?

Both at fault

DoubleSix

11,715 posts

176 months

Friday 5th February 2016
quotequote all
Charlie1986 said:
So a biker doing over 60mph passing stationary cars on a road that is blocked further up the road is ok?

Both at fault
laugh - no one said it was ok!!

Both were at fault; one paid with his life, the other not even endorsed afaik.

Seem fair??

If she'd hit with a lengthy ban and charged with DWDC then I think justice would have been done.



sidaorb

5,589 posts

206 months

Friday 5th February 2016
quotequote all
DoubleSix said:
laugh - no one said it was ok!!

Both were at fault; one paid with his life, the other not even endorsed afaik.

Seem fair??

If she'd hit with a lengthy ban and charged with DWDC then I think justice would have been done.
A jury found her not guilty of death by dangerous. Though her biggest sentence will be for life when she relives that moment in her mind.

Jonesy23

4,650 posts

136 months

Friday 5th February 2016
quotequote all
A jury with full access to the evidence gave a not guilty verdict. So trying to second guess it from a bit of stuff on TV doesn't really seem appropriate.

Legacywr

12,127 posts

188 months

Friday 5th February 2016
quotequote all
One thing I missed, or they didn't cover it at all.. did the Honda have it's indicator turned on? I'm sure that she would have been in such shock that the stalk would have remained in the same position as at the time of the collision!?

droopsnoot

11,933 posts

242 months

Friday 5th February 2016
quotequote all
Laurel Green said:
Round 3 of a 5 round bout. wink
It'll be interesting to see how that goes. They have a habit of dropping the series half-way through only for it to return without warning several months later. But now it's on BBC3, which has a short lifetime, next week (11th Feb) is in the EPG, but the next one would be on the 18th, and the channel goes online only on the 16th. So I don't know if all the schedule will continue online from the 17th, or if something else will happen. Seems to me to be too high-profile of a show to be made online-only.

Megaflow

9,410 posts

225 months

Friday 5th February 2016
quotequote all
sidaorb said:
DoubleSix said:
laugh - no one said it was ok!!

Both were at fault; one paid with his life, the other not even endorsed afaik.

Seem fair??

If she'd hit with a lengthy ban and charged with DWDC then I think justice would have been done.
A jury found her not guilty of death by dangerous. Though her biggest sentence will be for life when she relives that moment in her mind.
I suspect a large reason behind the not guilty verdict was the charge being address, death by dangerous driving, she turned around partially in a junction on a decent length of straight road. That, per se, is not dangerous.

Had she been charged with death by careless driving, I'd like to think she would have been found guilty.

WilliamWoollard

2,344 posts

193 months

Friday 5th February 2016
quotequote all
I was only half watching but I thought the charge was death by careless.

speedking31

3,556 posts

136 months

Friday 5th February 2016
quotequote all
Iva Barchetta said:
"Wild goose chase"....Astra man.

What a moron.
Agreed the guy was a bit of an idiot, but a 6 month ban seems completely disproportionate to the offence compared to a lot of the joyriding chavs that are shown.

Munter

31,319 posts

241 months

Friday 5th February 2016
quotequote all
WilliamWoollard said:
I was only half watching but I thought the charge was death by careless.
I thought so too.

If the biker hadn't been going over the limit, and/or over a speed it's sensible to filter past stationary traffic. Would he have died? I'd suspect not.

The bikers decision on his speed in those circumstances killed him. Going at a sensible speed past stationary cars (say 30ish) he might have had the crash but survived, or not had the crash at all. In my mind she might be guilty of a lesser charge. But not "death by".

andym1603

1,812 posts

172 months

Friday 5th February 2016
quotequote all
Looking at the damage to the nearside of her car, does that mean before she carried out her U-turn she was on the wrong side of the road? Or am I over thinking this?

Laurel Green

30,779 posts

232 months

Friday 5th February 2016
quotequote all
droopsnoot said:
It'll be interesting to see how that goes. They have a habit of dropping the series half-way through only for it to return without warning several months later. But now it's on BBC3, which has a short lifetime, next week (11th Feb) is in the EPG, but the next one would be on the 18th, and the channel goes online only on the 16th. So I don't know if all the schedule will continue online from the 17th, or if something else will happen. Seems to me to be too high-profile of a show to be made online-only.
Yep, it's a bloody nightmare the way the BBC schedules MC. It's certainly not a clever way to attract viewers to such shows - fingers crossed for no repeat of such shambles with this series. smile

darren f

982 posts

213 months

Friday 5th February 2016
quotequote all
Very similar circumstances to the biker incident but a different legal interpretation here. Some may remember the harrowing footage (issued with the family's consent) from the biker's helmet cam of the incident. Another case of ' I didn't look properly' and a biker using excessive speed, but in this case the driver gets a ban and community service.

Edited by darren f on Friday 5th February 18:26