Discussion
Am I the only one thinking that Dave have got this countdown to RDX the wrong way around?
They've shown all the series from 8 to 1 on the run up to 10 starting, but really they should have shown 1-8 then back to earth before 10 starts.
The reason I think it's wrong is because every RD fan knows, the first few series were the best - so they're going from worst, to best before a brand new series. Also, they're going from oldest to youngest (remember RD 1 was made in 1989), whereas by RDX they all look so old!. Furthermore, they have gone from pricey sets, to cheap sets and no graphical effects to (probably) pricey sets and loads of effects.
It just seems so arse over tit to me, going this way!
They've shown all the series from 8 to 1 on the run up to 10 starting, but really they should have shown 1-8 then back to earth before 10 starts.
The reason I think it's wrong is because every RD fan knows, the first few series were the best - so they're going from worst, to best before a brand new series. Also, they're going from oldest to youngest (remember RD 1 was made in 1989), whereas by RDX they all look so old!. Furthermore, they have gone from pricey sets, to cheap sets and no graphical effects to (probably) pricey sets and loads of effects.
It just seems so arse over tit to me, going this way!
Mr Happy said:
Am I the only one thinking that Dave have got this countdown to RDX the wrong way around?
They've shown all the series from 8 to 1 on the run up to 10 starting, but really they should have shown 1-8 then back to earth before 10 starts.
The reason I think it's wrong is because every RD fan knows, the first few series were the best - so they're going from worst, to best before a brand new series. Also, they're going from oldest to youngest (remember RD 1 was made in 1989), whereas by RDX they all look so old!. Furthermore, they have gone from pricey sets, to cheap sets and no graphical effects to (probably) pricey sets and loads of effects.
It just seems so arse over tit to me, going this way!
That does seem very odd, and annoying. That said, most people in to Red Dwarf properly will have the DVD anyway, so could just pop the DVD on.They've shown all the series from 8 to 1 on the run up to 10 starting, but really they should have shown 1-8 then back to earth before 10 starts.
The reason I think it's wrong is because every RD fan knows, the first few series were the best - so they're going from worst, to best before a brand new series. Also, they're going from oldest to youngest (remember RD 1 was made in 1989), whereas by RDX they all look so old!. Furthermore, they have gone from pricey sets, to cheap sets and no graphical effects to (probably) pricey sets and loads of effects.
It just seems so arse over tit to me, going this way!
Mr Happy said:
Am I the only one thinking that Dave have got this countdown to RDX the wrong way around?
They've shown all the series from 8 to 1 on the run up to 10 starting, but really they should have shown 1-8 then back to earth before 10 starts.
The reason I think it's wrong is because every RD fan knows, the first few series were the best - so they're going from worst, to best before a brand new series. Also, they're going from oldest to youngest (remember RD 1 was made in 1989), whereas by RDX they all look so old!. Furthermore, they have gone from pricey sets, to cheap sets and no graphical effects to (probably) pricey sets and loads of effects.
It just seems so arse over tit to me, going this way!
I think you're right in that they realised that series 9 was pretty poor and Back to Earth was worse and that they'd rather roll in to the new series on a high. They've shown all the series from 8 to 1 on the run up to 10 starting, but really they should have shown 1-8 then back to earth before 10 starts.
The reason I think it's wrong is because every RD fan knows, the first few series were the best - so they're going from worst, to best before a brand new series. Also, they're going from oldest to youngest (remember RD 1 was made in 1989), whereas by RDX they all look so old!. Furthermore, they have gone from pricey sets, to cheap sets and no graphical effects to (probably) pricey sets and loads of effects.
It just seems so arse over tit to me, going this way!
There have been some great episodes and I really, really hope it goes back to form.
I liked this. Doctor Who Red Dwarf Style Intro.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZMAkiukkToQ&fea...
I liked this. Doctor Who Red Dwarf Style Intro.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZMAkiukkToQ&fea...
Interview with Doug Naylor to whet your appetite.
http://video.sky.com/tv/related/52055/0/Red%20Dwar...
http://video.sky.com/tv/related/52055/0/Red%20Dwar...
Fingers crossed it won't be s
t. Fingers crossed it won't be st. Fingers crossed it won't be st. Fingers crossed it won't be st. Fingers crossed it won't be st.
Watched the countdown, seeing all the series again. IV, V & VI are still my favourites, they got the sets, humour characters just right.
Don't like the look of Kryten's nose, it appears to be melting at the tip.
t. Fingers crossed it won't be st. Fingers crossed it won't be st. Fingers crossed it won't be st. Fingers crossed it won't be st. Watched the countdown, seeing all the series again. IV, V & VI are still my favourites, they got the sets, humour characters just right.
Don't like the look of Kryten's nose, it appears to be melting at the tip.
Gassing Station | TV, Film, Video Streaming & Radio | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff