The Richardsons and At Home With The Noonans
Discussion
www.facebook.com/JudasPig
I also just read that O'Mahoney has news regarding some new evidence that migth help Jack Wholmes case. It's being announced this Friday.
I'll believe it when I see it though.
I also just read that O'Mahoney has news regarding some new evidence that migth help Jack Wholmes case. It's being announced this Friday.
I'll believe it when I see it though.
Oakey said:
www.facebook.com/JudasPig
I also just read that O'Mahoney has news regarding some new evidence that migth help Jack Wholmes case. It's being announced this Friday.
I'll believe it when I see it though.
He must be releasing a new book.I also just read that O'Mahoney has news regarding some new evidence that migth help Jack Wholmes case. It's being announced this Friday.
I'll believe it when I see it though.
essexplumber said:
Wasn't that one of his 1st books?
Not according to his website http://www.bernardomahoney.com it's about how he wrote to the paedophiles in prison to make them confess or something along those lines, not something I'll be buying. Whilst British crime is interesting to me, I don't think I could stomach to read it.
Some interesting comments on here but there are a few things I have to say.
This is only my opinion but but Jack and Mick did NOT do the shootings. No evidence whatsoever apart from super grass Nichols statement. Look at other conspiracies and you will see a pattern. You can read the statements and forensic reports from the shootings online, you will read that there was not a single shred of forensic evidence in the car that Nichols claims he used to pick up Whomes, seems a bit weird considering it was December and Workhouse lane is notoriously muddy. Don't you think there would have been some mud from Whomes boots at least? What about the amount of blood that Nichols claim was all over Whomes when he got in the car. No blood or mud samples were ever produced to the courts. This evidence would have been provided to the courts if the prosecution had it because it would have been so damning. It just doesn't make sense.
People need to take a closer look at B-O-M in my opinion. He told the police that on the day of the shooting he couldn't remember what he was doing, he said he THINKS he was just wondering around London for a few hours. Absolute rubbish. His mother lived not far from Workhouse lane either. Her house was sold not long after the murders, why? Did he have something to hide. When asked where he slept that night he told police he stayed at his girlfriends, a mistake telling police that because when they questioned his girlfriend she said he stayed at his mum's house.
Also Leah Betts died 2 weeks before the murders and her dad was a police officer, quite high up but can't remember his rank. I could go on forever about this as I have followed it for years.
Just ask yourself this question and before you reply with silly comments and remember this is only my opinion.
How could 3 drug dealers get blasted with shotguns while under a 24 hour police servielence order?
I look forward to your replies
This is only my opinion but but Jack and Mick did NOT do the shootings. No evidence whatsoever apart from super grass Nichols statement. Look at other conspiracies and you will see a pattern. You can read the statements and forensic reports from the shootings online, you will read that there was not a single shred of forensic evidence in the car that Nichols claims he used to pick up Whomes, seems a bit weird considering it was December and Workhouse lane is notoriously muddy. Don't you think there would have been some mud from Whomes boots at least? What about the amount of blood that Nichols claim was all over Whomes when he got in the car. No blood or mud samples were ever produced to the courts. This evidence would have been provided to the courts if the prosecution had it because it would have been so damning. It just doesn't make sense.
People need to take a closer look at B-O-M in my opinion. He told the police that on the day of the shooting he couldn't remember what he was doing, he said he THINKS he was just wondering around London for a few hours. Absolute rubbish. His mother lived not far from Workhouse lane either. Her house was sold not long after the murders, why? Did he have something to hide. When asked where he slept that night he told police he stayed at his girlfriends, a mistake telling police that because when they questioned his girlfriend she said he stayed at his mum's house.
Also Leah Betts died 2 weeks before the murders and her dad was a police officer, quite high up but can't remember his rank. I could go on forever about this as I have followed it for years.
Just ask yourself this question and before you reply with silly comments and remember this is only my opinion.
How could 3 drug dealers get blasted with shotguns while under a 24 hour police servielence order?
I look forward to your replies
Gassing Station | TV, Film, Video Streaming & Radio | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff