New Doctor Who Series

Author
Discussion

Killer2005

19,652 posts

229 months

Sunday 30th September 2012
quotequote all
Just managed to catch up with it, am I the only one who loved it?

Morningside

24,110 posts

230 months

Sunday 30th September 2012
quotequote all
When they jumped back in time how come we did not see both ponds in that room?
River can travel using that hand held travel system so when does she go back in time and write the book?

crofty1984

15,871 posts

205 months

Sunday 30th September 2012
quotequote all
Killer2005 said:
Just managed to catch up with it, am I the only one who loved it?
Nope. Really liked it.

Evangelion

7,729 posts

179 months

Monday 1st October 2012
quotequote all
kowalski655 said:
The new girl has much better boobs too-and on display in Ep 1 of "Room at the top"(still on iPlayer)
55 minutes in, not that I checked 4 or 5 times of course whistle
Quite nice but I preferred Maxine Peake's.
(Never thought the day would come when I started letching after Twink from dinnerladies.)

simonjunior831

133 posts

140 months

Monday 1st October 2012
quotequote all
Still now The Doctor is done. Mr Moffat can concentrate on Sherlock bounce

DJRC

23,563 posts

237 months

Monday 1st October 2012
quotequote all
I do however, like the interplay between River and the Doctor. "Just wait till my husband gets home" sort of thing smile Its a good fun angle.

extraT

1,762 posts

151 months

Monday 1st October 2012
quotequote all
Great ep. Very emotional.

Although the Angel angel was erm..."confused"...if memory serves correctly, Angels can only move when not being looked at....so:

1-as oen of the biggest tourist attractions in the world, how the hell was NOBODY looking at the Statue of Liberty??!! Or notice it leaning over a building??!! Or notice it "walking" through NY (the thuds)

2- Why didnt River or the Doc just keep looking at the Angel after it took Rory??!!

I know the answers- it served the purpose of killing off the Ponds, but still, it didnt follow from what we were told in previous episodes.

Still a cracking episode though, I must admit it was quite emotional. A great send off for both Characters.

Justin Cyder

12,624 posts

150 months

Monday 1st October 2012
quotequote all
You would think an inability to move unless unseen would be something of an evolutionary cul-de-sac.

TheHeretic

73,668 posts

256 months

Monday 1st October 2012
quotequote all
Justin Cyder said:
You would think an inability to move unless unseen would be something of an evolutionary cul-de-sac.
Look behind you.

Justin Cyder

12,624 posts

150 months

Monday 1st October 2012
quotequote all
TheHeretic said:
Look behind you.
yikes

hehe

im

34,302 posts

218 months

Monday 1st October 2012
quotequote all
Its a quantum thing. Something about the act of looking at them coalesces/freezes them in time/space.

I know, I know, like Quantum mechanics itself its best not to ask - just accept thats how they roll.

ali_kat

31,992 posts

222 months

Monday 1st October 2012
quotequote all
ETA - not my own work, I'm bored (no work) so my BA brain has kicked in & I've done some research tis moring to try & find some answers!

The Weeping Angels could move their victims back through time with a touch. They would then consume the potential energy from the lives the victims would otherwise have led. They could move people through both space and time, as Kathy was touched in London, but ended up in Hull in 1920; Billy Shipton was touched inside a parking garage and arrived in 1969 in an outdoor location; and the first time Rory was touched was in an archway in a park, and he arrived in a street; and the second time he was touched was in Grayle's cellar, and he arrived outside Winter Quay but in the same time period.

If they were sufficiently fed, however, the Angels would kill by sneaking up behind their victim and breaking their neck.

Due to the paradox created by Amy and Rory, the Doctor cannot travel back in time to visit them without destroying New York City - they poisioned the timelines.

No one knows why the SoL was able to move whilst being observed, possibly because it wasn't a 'real' angel, merely possessed by one?

Multiple times throughout the episode Angels are seen standing in groups or facing each other without their eyes covered, what we know of angels from past episodes would mean those angels would be permanently frozen as they are all able to see each other

They could also feed on other types of energy, such as radiation given off by a Galaxy class Star Liner or the electrical energy in electronics. This would cause lights to flicker, making it easier to use their quantum-locking - we have lights flickering as a common theme so far in this series...

Edited by ali_kat on Monday 1st October 11:11

Beefmeister

16,482 posts

231 months

Monday 1st October 2012
quotequote all
kowalski655 said:
I was quite surprised in the Xmas preview to see the new girl seems to be Victorian, rather than the space genius she played a few weeks ago. Wonder if they will work in a "family resemblence/ancestor" angle?
or, just maybe, she's just wearing Victorian clothes...



Oh and Ali - glad you admitted that wasn't your work, I was about to mock your Galaxy-class nerdiness! wink

FourWheelDrift

88,547 posts

285 months

Monday 1st October 2012
quotequote all
Beefmeister said:
or, just maybe, she's just wearing Victorian clothes...
The kinky minx.

zetec

4,468 posts

252 months

Monday 1st October 2012
quotequote all
ali_kat said:
Multiple times throughout the episode Angels are seen standing in groups or facing each other without their eyes covered, what we know of angels from past episodes would mean those angels would be permanently frozen as they are all able to see each other
I too noticed that, one scene in particular inside the apartment block, had Rory being 'chased', as he entered the apartment the two Angels were left in the corridor 'looking' at each other. I commented while watching that they should now be never able to move again!

ali_kat

31,992 posts

222 months

Monday 1st October 2012
quotequote all
Beefmeister said:
Oh and Ali - glad you admitted that wasn't your work, I was about to mock your Galaxy-class nerdiness! wink
There is that too paperbag But I like to check my facts as there are bigger nerd than me here wink

Hackney

6,850 posts

209 months

Monday 1st October 2012
quotequote all
im said:
Its a quantum thing. Something about the act of looking at them coalesces/freezes them in time/space.

I know, I know, like Quantum mechanics itself its best not to ask - just accept thats how they roll.
So that's how they get around, the crafty beggers.


Not sorry to see the end of the Ponds. They were becoming annoying. Rory was a bit part that had to end up having a major part and Karen Gillan replaced acting with stropping as far as I could tell.

ali_kat

31,992 posts

222 months

Monday 1st October 2012
quotequote all
Beefmeister said:
kowalski655 said:
I was quite surprised in the Xmas preview to see the new girl seems to be Victorian, rather than the space genius she played a few weeks ago. Wonder if they will work in a "family resemblence/ancestor" angle?
or, just maybe, she's just wearing Victorian clothes...
They have already said it is a family thing biggrin



I was disgusted by the number of people that didn't realise the pictures were not fom Doctor Who but from Twilight! She looks nothing like Amy or Ossie

Justin Cyder

12,624 posts

150 months

Monday 1st October 2012
quotequote all
Home made Dr. Who Monopoly. This guy has gone to a LOT of trouble.

http://imgur.com/a/PUJT4#0

stephen300o

15,464 posts

229 months

Monday 1st October 2012
quotequote all
Bedazzled said:
ali_kat said:
No one knows why the SoL was able to move whilst being observed, possibly because it wasn't a 'real' angel, merely possessed by one?
It's not even made of stone... it's copper with an iron support structure. confused
Ghostbusters left some slime in there.