X-Men: Days Of Future Past

Author
Discussion

lemmingjames

7,462 posts

205 months

Tuesday 27th May 2014
quotequote all
I thought it just ment that where by they changed the past, it rippled the future and changed events, so the war on mutants doesnt really exist, Jean Grey doesnt go mad etc

croyde

22,973 posts

231 months

Tuesday 27th May 2014
quotequote all
Did exec jets have winglets in 1973 and I saw a soldier with a modern black kevlar helmet on biggrin

London424

12,829 posts

176 months

Tuesday 27th May 2014
quotequote all
Went to see this last night and really enjoyed it.

The thing that does really piss me off is the way they've 'pulled a star trek'. Really pisses me off and I see it as lazy writing...and with so much material they could have done anything with the story.

Halb

53,012 posts

184 months

Tuesday 27th May 2014
quotequote all
Otispunkmeyer said:
Having said that, the original comics do their fair share of ignoring and re-writing history.
Ultimately that's what switched me off Marvel years ago.
Stan and Jack did some great stuff...but for fks sake Marvel need to get some balls and create new stuff.
I did enjoy the Ultimates stuff, but have read very little of it.

London424

12,829 posts

176 months

Tuesday 27th May 2014
quotequote all
The more I've been thinking about this, the more annoyed I am.


jdw100

4,126 posts

165 months

Tuesday 27th May 2014
quotequote all
Saw it last week - I'll give it a good 8.5/10.

Really enjoyed it!

DJRC

23,563 posts

237 months

Tuesday 27th May 2014
quotequote all
So nobody can actually agree what has now happened and how? Outstanding Marvel smile Surely everybody has learnt by now the only way to do this kind of stuff is hire Joss sit back and wait for the magic to happen. Not this disjointed bilge.

willisit

2,142 posts

232 months

Tuesday 27th May 2014
quotequote all
DJRC said:
So nobody can actually agree what has now happened and how? Outstanding Marvel smile Surely everybody has learnt by now the only way to do this kind of stuff is hire Joss sit back and wait for the magic to happen. Not this disjointed bilge.
I doubt you can blame Marvel since they didn't write, direct or produce it. It's just a Marvel film by nature of the copyright. I can find little evidence Marvel had anything to do with these films :P

London424

12,829 posts

176 months

Tuesday 27th May 2014
quotequote all
DJRC said:
So nobody can actually agree what has now happened and how? Outstanding Marvel smile Surely everybody has learnt by now the only way to do this kind of stuff is hire Joss sit back and wait for the magic to happen. Not this disjointed bilge.
I thought it was obvious.

That film has just rewritten the entire timeline (if they want to).

They will keep stuff they want, and get go off in new directions with others.

I mean there is no way that don't have Wolverine and Stryker getting together so he gets his adamantium skeleton.

JonRB

74,615 posts

273 months

Tuesday 27th May 2014
quotequote all
willisit said:
I doubt you can blame Marvel since they didn't write, direct or produce it. It's just a Marvel film by nature of the copyright. I can find little evidence Marvel had anything to do with these films :P
It's not. It's Fox who hold the film rights and, so long as they bang one out every few years, the film rights don't revert to Marvel.

See Den of Geek - Is X-Men immune to the reboot cycle?


Halb

53,012 posts

184 months

Tuesday 27th May 2014
quotequote all
JonRB said:
It's not. It's Fox who hold the film rights and, so long as they bang one out every few years, the film rights don't revert to Marvel.

See Den of Geek - Is X-Men immune to the reboot cycle?
The greed of Fox (and Sony) might result in continual renewals of these characters, churning them out into meaningless films and keeping them from the real Marvel universe going on around the Avengers.

VEA

4,785 posts

202 months

Tuesday 27th May 2014
quotequote all
Not seen it yet but...


H22observer

784 posts

128 months

Tuesday 27th May 2014
quotequote all
The whole situation with x-men reminds me of the endless Alien/Predator/AvP/Prometheus sequels & prequels that made little sense when knitted together.


H22observer

784 posts

128 months

Tuesday 27th May 2014
quotequote all
One other point of note :

Why did Magneto lift up the football stadium? What purpose did it serve? Was is just to make the film look good or was it something lifted from the comic book to satisfy the anoraks?

Quickmoose

4,495 posts

124 months

Wednesday 28th May 2014
quotequote all
H22observer said:
One other point of note :

Why did Magneto lift up the football stadium? What purpose did it serve? Was is just to make the film look good or was it something lifted from the comic book to satisfy the anoraks?
From what it allowed him t barricade himself in a confiend area with the president and Trask etc... stop army getting in, err... it came ready made with (disconnected) TV cameras to catch it all for the public to see...err...
no...thats the best I can do


I loved the film, lots of acting in it for a change.
I did struggle a smidge with the armies of 4-12 year olds being brought in by their parents to hear Xavier swear nice and slowly...so there it is ...I'm old.

anonymous-user

55 months

Wednesday 28th May 2014
quotequote all
Possible plot device for the next film that I was thinking: in the newly established timeline, Wolverine has never teamed with with Stryker, so has no adamantium in his skeleton. Perhaps Apocalypse will provide that as part of converting him into one of his four horseman. It's pretty inevitable that one or more X Men will be snaffled by Apocalypse, and he is the prime candidate.

IainT

10,040 posts

239 months

Wednesday 28th May 2014
quotequote all
London424 said:
I mean there is no way that don't have Wolverine and Stryker getting together so he gets his adamantium skeleton.
I was wondering how they were going to sort that out until the end.

For those confused about the re-writing of events I thought that was really clear. Blatantly obvious and stated in dialogue inside the first 15 minutes. Much of what happens after the 70s was going to be changed thus the present day (for the movie) would be significantly different.

I was surprised that they resurrected certain characters at the end but they're all cool.


Overall though the wife and I found the movie a little slow in parts and obvious in others. Much of the humour from the comics was missing.

All thoroughly made up for by Mystique imho. lick

THX

2,348 posts

123 months

Wednesday 28th May 2014
quotequote all
I really did enjoy the film, but couldn't help but think there were two production companies at work; one wielding the usual 24FPS camera, and another with the new 48's...

Some of the effects really were breath taking (coming from a SFX nerd who's become utterly bored of CG) but others were... just a bit st.

That said, the script was great fun (I'm not going to think about the time travel elements too hard / at all)

MissChief

7,115 posts

169 months

Thursday 29th May 2014
quotequote all
Really enjoyed it! Fassbender fantastic, McKellen excellent as always. And the film has done nothing whatsoever to dampen my enthusiasm for Jennifer Lawrence.

GrumpyTwig

3,354 posts

158 months

Thursday 29th May 2014
quotequote all
Thought it was good, probably better than the previous films tbh simply because of the humour.
Better than Godzilla anyway (which isn't terrible just not great...).