Top Gear Series 21
Discussion
AndStilliRise said:
First of all you have to deliberate it a coincidence or accident.
Pro:
1. All three plates have a reference to the war
2. It is statistically impossible to have all 3 cars with references to the same war, which indicates they have been added to the cars
3. There has been cry of coincidence from TG for the first car, however not the remaining two
4. There has been no apology for the coincidence
5. TG has a history of such things (E.g. Mexico, Belgium)
6. It has been done in the style of TG (Using the car to convey the message, rather then mention anything in the script)
If TG did buy the cars like that then they would the V5 documents to show the car with the plates. However in my opinion the plates have been added. Not sure how to check TBH.
....I am not bothered either way TBH however I have been looking for an argument all day!
You're really starting to piss me off, the three plates do NOT have a reference to the war, not even fPro:
1. All three plates have a reference to the war
2. It is statistically impossible to have all 3 cars with references to the same war, which indicates they have been added to the cars
3. There has been cry of coincidence from TG for the first car, however not the remaining two
4. There has been no apology for the coincidence
5. TG has a history of such things (E.g. Mexico, Belgium)
6. It has been done in the style of TG (Using the car to convey the message, rather then mention anything in the script)
If TG did buy the cars like that then they would the V5 documents to show the car with the plates. However in my opinion the plates have been added. Not sure how to check TBH.
....I am not bothered either way TBH however I have been looking for an argument all day!
king close. I have an 84 porsche in the garage, the plate has the number 270 on it. Are you actually trying to claim that two plates with numbers that are within 50 of a particular number that is loosely related to the war is a planned thing, you could have picked any fking number that was close. If it was 40 you could go with the number of ships sent, if 800, the number of missiles fired, etc etc.Get a f
king grip
AndStilliRise said:
First of all you have to deliberate it a coincidence or accident.
Pro:
1. All three plates have a reference to the war
2. It is statistically impossible to have all 3 cars with references to the same war, which indicates they have been added to the cars
3. There has been cry of coincidence from TG for the first car, however not the remaining two
4. There has been no apology for the coincidence
5. TG has a history of such things (E.g. Mexico, Belgium)
6. It has been done in the style of TG (Using the car to convey the message, rather then mention anything in the script)
If TG did buy the cars like that then they would the V5 documents to show the car with the plates. However in my opinion the plates have been added. Not sure how to check TBH.
....I am not bothered either way TBH however I have been looking for an argument all day!
1. Can you explain how please?Pro:
1. All three plates have a reference to the war
2. It is statistically impossible to have all 3 cars with references to the same war, which indicates they have been added to the cars
3. There has been cry of coincidence from TG for the first car, however not the remaining two
4. There has been no apology for the coincidence
5. TG has a history of such things (E.g. Mexico, Belgium)
6. It has been done in the style of TG (Using the car to convey the message, rather then mention anything in the script)
If TG did buy the cars like that then they would the V5 documents to show the car with the plates. However in my opinion the plates have been added. Not sure how to check TBH.
....I am not bothered either way TBH however I have been looking for an argument all day!
2. Stop saying statistically impossible, cause it just isn't. Statistically impossible just means impossible, all three registrations are legal for the cars they are on therefore it is, however unlikely, not impossible.
3. What is the coincidence on cars 2&3 - see point 1
4. Are you sure they should apologise for a coincidence?
5. circumstantial at best
6. Other examples? circumstantial.
Well people in this very thread have already checked and said the reg has been on the car since 2001 - that's some serious forward planning from TG.
They should have used this one 
http://dvlaregistrations.direct.gov.uk/buy.html?pl...
This one would have been fitting
http://dvlaregistrations.direct.gov.uk/buy.html?pl...
http://dvlaregistrations.direct.gov.uk/buy.html?pl...
This one would have been fitting
http://dvlaregistrations.direct.gov.uk/buy.html?pl...
fatboy18 said:
They should have used this one
http://dvlaregistrations.direct.gov.uk/buy.html?pl...
This one would have been fitting
http://dvlaregistrations.direct.gov.uk/buy.html?pl...
or this http://dvlaregistrations.direct.gov.uk/buy.html?pl...
This one would have been fitting
http://dvlaregistrations.direct.gov.uk/buy.html?pl...
juice said:
fatboy18 said:
They should have used this one
http://dvlaregistrations.direct.gov.uk/buy.html?pl...
This one would have been fitting
http://dvlaregistrations.direct.gov.uk/buy.html?pl...
or this http://dvlaregistrations.direct.gov.uk/buy.html?pl...
This one would have been fitting
http://dvlaregistrations.direct.gov.uk/buy.html?pl...
Scuffers said:
AndStilliRise said:
1. All three plates have a reference to the war
2. It is statistically impossible to have all 3 cars with references to the same war, which indicates they have been added to the cars
and I think we have our nomination for the Pistonheads Pillock of the week award!2. It is statistically impossible to have all 3 cars with references to the same war, which indicates they have been added to the cars
Gassing Station | TV, Film, Video Streaming & Radio | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff