Christopher Nolan - Interstellar

Author
Discussion

anonymous-user

54 months

Wednesday 19th November 2014
quotequote all
vescaegg said:
garyhun said:
vescaegg said:
I asked earlier but no one responded.. Can anyone explain where MM is going at the end of the film seeing as the wormhole is no longer there?
Why do you think the wormhole has gone?
Because Jonathan Nolan who wrote the film said so;


Nolan: By the end of Cooper's journey, the wormhole is gone. It's up to us now to undertake the massive journey of spreading out across the face of our galaxy. Brand is still somewhere out there on the far side of the wormhole. The wormhole has disappeared entirely. It's gone.

IGN: And he has to try and get to Brand in this little ship?

Nolan: That's the idea.

Full interview;

http://uk.ign.com/articles/2014/11/08/jonathan-nol...
Ta, never read that before. I think the lovely Ms Hathaway may have a long wait.

s m

23,231 posts

203 months

Wednesday 19th November 2014
quotequote all
croyde said:
I must have super hearing as the only bit of dialogue that I didn't catch was Michael Caine's last words. Thought the rest of it was clear enough although generally the sound was pretty stty as it always is at my local CineWorld.

ie Far too loud to the point that the speakers sound as if they are gonna blow.
Same here Croyde - I heard it all ok but I was in a lowly Cineworld too,not an IMAX . I'm sort of glad, hearing about the problems some had at an IMAX that I don't have one smile

vrsmxtb

2,002 posts

156 months

Wednesday 19th November 2014
quotequote all
I saw it at a Showcase, and thought the sound was on the loud side but fine - only bit of dialogue I struggled with were Caine's last words but we've established that was a deliberate mixing decision.

Halb

53,012 posts

183 months

Wednesday 19th November 2014
quotequote all
Just watched it.
Some thoughts before I read the thread.

Very good film, I predicted a lot of what happened, enjoyed Damon's Heel turn.
Very similar to 2001, and had elements of the novel, Strata.
Got extremely tired of the 'wing-cam' very quickly.
Best character? The funny robot, very funny.
Worst thing about the film? The sound...fking music drowning out half the fking dialogue which was mumbled...fking idiots.

Pommygranite

14,259 posts

216 months

Thursday 20th November 2014
quotequote all
DeltaTango said:
Tried my hardest to like it. Didn't have any issues with sound / understanding what was said. I cannot recall the last time I was so bored however.
This! this 100% At the end I just felt...bored.


Eric Mc

122,037 posts

265 months

Thursday 20th November 2014
quotequote all
Really enjoyed it. To me it was "2001" with some heart.

The sound was nothing like the issue some people are making it out to be.

ikarl

3,730 posts

199 months

Thursday 20th November 2014
quotequote all
I really enjoyed the film, but then I would because I love sci-fi films.

The thing is, I'm not completely sure I liked it because it was good, or inspite of it being bad.

There were some fantastic shots - I loved the shot of the spaceship across Saturn.
The robots were absolutely brilliant - loved the 'settings' they could be programmed with!


Asterix

24,438 posts

228 months

Thursday 20th November 2014
quotequote all
The 'Saturn' shot was something else.

I'm very pleased I saw the film on the big screen if only for that.

EskimoArapaho

5,135 posts

135 months

Thursday 20th November 2014
quotequote all
Awful film. 2/10 (and I love sci-fi). No depth, no wonder.

The pre-ending was jarringly unrealistic compared to the plausible plotline that went before. And reconnecting that part of the story to the schmaltzy ending was a stretch too far.

The score was loud, but its main problem was that is was just far too dramatic for the on-screen action. Having a crescendo build when all of the visual drama of a scene was already played out soon got annoying.

There were a few good parts that were underexplored (differences in the passage of time, etc).

Three hours that felt like five (aptly).

Eric Mc

122,037 posts

265 months

Thursday 20th November 2014
quotequote all
For me, three hours that seemed like 1.5 hours.

Just shows, people see things so differently.

I loved it.


croyde

22,933 posts

230 months

Thursday 20th November 2014
quotequote all
Daily Mash take on it, love the bit at the end about the Cola hehe

http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/news/arts-entertainm...

anonymous-user

54 months

Thursday 20th November 2014
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
For me, three hours that seemed like 1.5 hours.

Just shows, people see things so differently.

I loved it.
Exactly the same for me. Didn't even need a half time pee!

snotrag

14,464 posts

211 months

Thursday 20th November 2014
quotequote all
Saw it ten days ago or so.

At a Cineworld IMAX no less. Very good I thought., No sound issues - I thought the sound quality was excellent, thunderous where needed.

That explosion made the whole place jump a foot, was brilliant.

Seriously considering going again, and I rarely go to the Cinema.

FWIW I loved inception too. Haven't seen Memento, sounds like I should.

Eric Mc

122,037 posts

265 months

Thursday 20th November 2014
quotequote all
And ironically, for all the complaints about the sound levels, there was NO SOUND IN SPACE. Which is a very rare but accurate portrayal of how things really are.

It really was "2001" taken up a notch or two for the 21st Century.

EskimoArapaho

5,135 posts

135 months

Thursday 20th November 2014
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
For me, three hours that seemed like 1.5 hours.
I guess this is where relativity and psychology run parallel. smile You were so drawn in by the plot that your 3 hours felt like 1.5. Whereas I wasn't, and so time ran slower. Life imitating art?

(Anyway, the best bit was that I saw the trailer for The Imitation Game and that looks great, so will see that this weekend.)

lukefreeman

1,494 posts

175 months

Thursday 20th November 2014
quotequote all
I enjoyed it, far too many holes for me though (Blackholes/Wormholes wahey)

. So you need a lot of power to take off on Earth, but as soon as we're on a planet with 1.2x gravity, and similar atmohsphere, he can take off using a stty craft?
. It's too paradoxical, see the tesseract scene (What came first Chicken or Egg here?)
. As Brand didn't go through the black hole, and MM's on that crappy little station at the end, she will have aged more than him. He will get to her planet and she'll be dead!


Edited by lukefreeman on Thursday 20th November 13:08

Legend83

9,982 posts

222 months

Thursday 20th November 2014
quotequote all
Someone fix his spoilers for him!

ikarl

3,730 posts

199 months

Thursday 20th November 2014
quotequote all
Question -

with the collection of eggs or embryo's or whatever it was that was going to populate a planet, was there ever any explanation about how that would happen?

is it like a pop-up-tent where you crack a couple together and out pops a human....or, was she going to put them in her then pop kids out of her 'soon-to-be-wizards-sleeve' as quickly as she could?



Legend83

9,982 posts

222 months

Thursday 20th November 2014
quotequote all
ikarl said:
Question -

with the collection of eggs or embryo's or whatever it was that was going to populate a planet, was there ever any explanation about how that would happen?

is it like a pop-up-tent where you crack a couple together and out pops a human....or, was she going to put them in her then pop kids out of her 'soon-to-be-wizards-sleeve' as quickly as she could?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embryo_space_coloniza...

Eric Mc

122,037 posts

265 months

Thursday 20th November 2014
quotequote all
Yes - there were some inconsistencies - but what the hell (as Dr Brown would say).