Christopher Nolan - Interstellar

Author
Discussion

va1o

16,032 posts

208 months

Sunday 9th November 2014
quotequote all
Just got back from seeing this but I was really disappointed. Just found it long and boring not really making a lot of sense. The acting etc was good enough but as a film definitely not my cup of tea. Oh and I hated Gravity last year too! hehe

trashbat

6,006 posts

154 months

Sunday 9th November 2014
quotequote all
I liked the bit where he was in The Borrowers.

And 124? Naaah.

Overall, not brilliant. Expected Gravity, mostly got Armageddon.

-Z-

6,045 posts

207 months

Monday 10th November 2014
quotequote all
A very detailed article on the science of the film by someone with a PhD in mathematical physics.

Including a section on how the end scene is still theoretically possible.

Spoilers: http://ikjyotsinghkohli24.wordpress.com/2014/11/07...

greygoose

8,282 posts

196 months

Monday 10th November 2014
quotequote all
Went to see it yesterday and enjoyed it as a film, it could probably do with another screening and Prof Brian Cox explaining the physics of it all before I could understand it fully though! The dust bowl ending of earth was very well done.

JustinP1

13,330 posts

231 months

Monday 10th November 2014
quotequote all
PF62 said:
JustinP1 said:
Were there science holes? I'd actually say not
JustinP1 said:

The premise of the last act is that the wormhole and the rest were placed there by 'us' at some time in the future.


So we need to go through the wormhole, to get the information to save the human race, so the human race can survive so we can then create a wormhole to save the human race.

A pretty big hole.
If you consider the more modern theoretical physics, where both multiverse and multidimensional theories are the accepted norm, again, there is nothing in the film that I could see which flew in the face of science as we know it today.

The concept of the film is to engage your thought processes in a way which opens your mind to possibilities that you have not considered.

Of course, for a lot of theoretical physics we don't have experiments to prove it, nor will be able to for decades or hundreds of years, but I do believe the film gives a good description of what genuinely is possible. It gives as a 'what if' scenario.

To junk the film based upon the fact that it does not correspond with GCSE science is like trashing the concepts in say 'Contact' with the statement 'Aliens don't exist'.

trashbat

6,006 posts

154 months

Monday 10th November 2014
quotequote all
That's nonsense.

If you're going to run with the idea that (for example, to avoid spoilers) going back to before you were born and killing your own father is possible, because of the multiverse, then why not just go, 'oh, let's pick the reality where the Earth didn't go to st in a dustbowl'?

JustinP1

13,330 posts

231 months

Monday 10th November 2014
quotequote all
trashbat said:
That's nonsense.

If you're going to run with the idea that (for example, to avoid spoilers) going back to before you were born and killing your own father is possible, because of the multiverse, then why not just go, 'oh, let's pick the reality where the Earth didn't go to st in a dustbowl'?
Who says that that would be the only universe they chose? That would be very presumptuous.

If you read some of the theorists who speculate if there are other civilisations out there, somewhere in space or time, it is seriously considered that perhaps only a minority of life forms will get to the point where they can harness and control physics as they will more likely have killed themselves through war, overpopulation or even a science experiment which goes catastrophically wrong. smile

willisit

2,142 posts

232 months

Monday 10th November 2014
quotequote all
Seems to be doing the job - people seeing it; debating it.. smile

I think I liked it. I'm almost tempted to see it again... it does owe a lot to films like 2001; not because it rips them off, but I think because it paying tribute. The fact the "new" 2001 trailer ran before (containing a quite from Nolan) does make sense.

I'm just happy Sci-Fi movies of this sort are back. More please.

trashbat

6,006 posts

154 months

Monday 10th November 2014
quotequote all
JustinP1 said:
Who says that that would be the only universe they chose? That would be very presumptuous.

If you read some of the theorists who speculate if there are other civilisations out there, somewhere in space or time, it is seriously considered that perhaps only a minority of life forms will get to the point where they can harness and control physics as they will more likely have killed themselves through war, overpopulation or even a science experiment which goes catastrophically wrong. smile
I don't have any problem with that probability, or the idea of the multiverse.

The issue I have is the plot of sending your past self a message which directly leads to your ability to send that message.

If you work around that with the idea that it's not the same single instance of you, but parallel you, then who gives a st about anything any more?


vescaegg

25,605 posts

168 months

Monday 10th November 2014
quotequote all
I think I may need a rewatch of this film. Was massively dissapointed but I think I just didnt understand it!

Maybe another viewing on DVD is in order.

andyjo1982

4,960 posts

211 months

Monday 10th November 2014
quotequote all
Saw this last night with OH. We both enjoyed it, though we found it hard to follow at some parts.

Plenty of food for thought in there, though I agree with other posts about the sound. Sometimes it was pretty difficult to understand what was being said.

Don't think I can see myself buying the DVD, but well worth a watch at the cinema.

8/10 from me.

JustinP1

13,330 posts

231 months

Monday 10th November 2014
quotequote all
trashbat said:
JustinP1 said:
Who says that that would be the only universe they chose? That would be very presumptuous.

If you read some of the theorists who speculate if there are other civilisations out there, somewhere in space or time, it is seriously considered that perhaps only a minority of life forms will get to the point where they can harness and control physics as they will more likely have killed themselves through war, overpopulation or even a science experiment which goes catastrophically wrong. smile
I don't have any problem with that probability, or the idea of the multiverse.

The issue I have is the plot of sending your past self a message which directly leads to your ability to send that message.

If you work around that with the idea that it's not the same single instance of you, but parallel you, then who gives a st about anything any more?
Being more general, and not spoilerish, relativity is a hell of a thing mentally to get your head around. We've experienced the world with our own eyes, and time and space are constant.

Thus, the default to our own minds is that such things which break that are impossible.

You need to escape the fact that time can only exist in one place at one time. Effectively, the life of Mahogany is like a a vinyl record. To him, he can only experience being played from start to end.

In the last act, he experienced that 'they' have total control over more than our four dimensions however they have harnessed that. Effectively, they can pick up the record player stylus to wherever they want, and show Mahogany his, and his daughter's life. Of course Mahogany uses gravity to affect particular points in space time.

He has been given the chance to effectively add grooves in his own record.

Thus, of course, when Mahogany experiences his life like a record running from start to end, those grooves are there so he would of course experience them.

Blaster72

10,902 posts

198 months

Monday 10th November 2014
quotequote all
Well, I'm impressed. 9/10 for me.

The acting is terrific, the young Murph is outstanding. Its an all star cast but none of the actors are overbearing and some very famous faces have some relatively minor parts. The appearance of Matt Damon really surprised me having not read much about the film before hand.

As for the storyline, its a long film but had me hooked throughout and even gave me a lump in my throat at several points. I was very surprised at what happened on the watery planet and this element really made the film special.

I did get very confused with the whole fifth dimension thing 3/4 of the way through but they recovered it with a good solid ending.


Definitely one to see on the big screen, might even buy the Blu Ray when its released.

Christopher Nolan has outdone himself, the film is a masterpiece.

Edited by Blaster72 on Monday 10th November 16:08

JustinP1

13,330 posts

231 months

Monday 10th November 2014
quotequote all
Please use the spoiler tag for plot points Blaster72!

Blaster72

10,902 posts

198 months

Monday 10th November 2014
quotequote all
JustinP1 said:
Please use the spoiler tag for plot points Blaster72!
Done, although I'm not sure why anyone would click on a thread with this title if they want to avoid knowing anything about the film. I certainly easily avoided all threads to do with it.

Shaoxter

4,086 posts

125 months

Monday 10th November 2014
quotequote all
Blaster72 said:
JustinP1 said:
Please use the spoiler tag for plot points Blaster72!
Done, although I'm not sure why anyone would click on a thread with this title if they want to avoid knowing anything about the film. I certainly easily avoided all threads to do with it.
Probably because they want to get an opinion on how the movie is, but don't want to read the critics reviews/watch the trailers which are full of spoilers these days.

Blaster72

10,902 posts

198 months

Monday 10th November 2014
quotequote all
Fair enough.

Aphex

2,160 posts

201 months

Monday 10th November 2014
quotequote all
Getting pretty tired of Michael Caine and Nolan.

Was quite glad the music was so loud that I couldn't hear him dis-jointedly mumble out his last words

KareemK

1,110 posts

120 months

Monday 10th November 2014
quotequote all
Michael Caine was the only negative for me.

For me I'm afraid he just can't carry-off 'Pre-eminent Gravitational Physicist' (or whatever).

He's played a Cockney Gangster/Batmans Butler for far too long to able to switch easily to cerebral egghead in my book.

Dakkon

7,826 posts

254 months

Monday 10th November 2014
quotequote all
KareemK said:
DJRC said:
Since when the fk was Inception supposed to be a good film???
Since forever.

8.8/10 from 1,061,492 users on IMDB

4.2/5 from 556,782 users on Rotten Tomatoes
I agree, I thought Inception was great.