Can't Pay? We'll Take It Away!: Ch5 9pm

Can't Pay? We'll Take It Away!: Ch5 9pm

Author
Discussion

Halb

53,012 posts

183 months

Wednesday 25th May 2016
quotequote all
Started watching it now...I feel for them when they have to enter DAYL camps.
They knew they were in for it!

Legacywr

Original Poster:

12,128 posts

188 months

Wednesday 25th May 2016
quotequote all
CoolHands said:
Err maybe I'm a better judge of character than you, if you believed him?

Agoraphobic. 1 hour later, sitting outside. He was a liar, through and through.
I'd be less trusting of the landlord...

andymc

7,356 posts

207 months

Wednesday 25th May 2016
quotequote all
Halb said:
Started watching it now...I feel for them when they have to enter DAYL camps.
They knew they were in for it!
front rank fire

Oakey

27,566 posts

216 months

Thursday 26th May 2016
quotequote all
nicanary said:
CoolHands said:
Oakey said:
Seems like one of the bailiffs, Del, got into a bit of trouble with the FSA in the past

http://www.fca.org.uk/static/pubs/final/delroy_ang...
I seem to have lost the ability to read cos I can't make head nor tail of that. He has lost the permission. To do what?!

I assume he tried to set himself up as a one-man band bailiff company but came unstuck for some reason not given.
I assumed he was an insurance salesman (sorry........financial services consultant....) who did something naughty. Plenty of them about.
He was a mortgage broker / financial consultant according to Google;

https://uk.linkedin.com/in/delroy-anglin-8925074?t...

https://uk.linkedin.com/in/delroy-anglin-939390b



Trax

1,537 posts

232 months

Thursday 26th May 2016
quotequote all
Alucidnation said:
I didn't think they could take "tools of the trade" with the computer guy at the end?
They may not have taken them, didnt look like they had anything of value anyway, more than likely bluff to get him to borrow money from someone else.

What worries me, is how a business debt, turned into a personal debt....

It seemed that his name was on the judgement, but should it just be the business? Is this a court error, just by putting the directrs name on the judgement against a business should not mean the debt now becomes not just the business debt?

98elise

26,596 posts

161 months

Thursday 26th May 2016
quotequote all
Trax said:
Alucidnation said:
I didn't think they could take "tools of the trade" with the computer guy at the end?
They may not have taken them, didnt look like they had anything of value anyway, more than likely bluff to get him to borrow money from someone else.

What worries me, is how a business debt, turned into a personal debt....

It seemed that his name was on the judgement, but should it just be the business? Is this a court error, just by putting the directrs name on the judgement against a business should not mean the debt now becomes not just the business debt?
Was he Ltd or sole trader?

BlackLabel

13,251 posts

123 months

Thursday 26th May 2016
quotequote all
Alucidnation said:
I didn't think they could take "tools of the trade" with the computer guy at the end?
Under certain circumstances they can. The government website below suggests they can take tools if they are worth more than £1,350.


gov.uk said:
What bailiffs can and can’t take

If you let a bailiff into your home, they may take some of your belongings to sell.

Bailiffs can take luxury items, eg a TV or games console.

They can’t take:

things you need, eg your clothes, cooker, fridge
work tools and equipment which together are worth less than £1,350
someone else’s belongings, eg your partner’s computer

You’ll have to prove that someone else’s goods don’t belong to you.
https://www.gov.uk/your-rights-bailiffs/what-you-can-do-when-a-bailiff-visits

Also, if 'tools of the trade' are also available to someone else to use they can take it. With computer equipment I assume that means if the wife also used the computer for personal reasons then they could take it.

thesheriffsoffice.com said:
The main areas where items cannot be seized are:

Bedding, clothing, furniture and provisions that the debtor and their family need for a basic level of domestic life.
Perishable goods: refrigerated foodstuffs, fresh flowers etc.
Tools of the trade: those needed by the debtor to do their job or run their business, for example tools, books, vehicles etc.

However, these goods must be used solely by the debtor for the purposes of his or her work to fall under ‘tools of the trade’. For example, a commercial van that is also used by the debtor’s spouse is available for seizure.
http://thesheriffsoffice.com/articles/which_goods_may_be_seized

Alucidnation

16,810 posts

170 months

Friday 27th May 2016
quotequote all
Hmmmm, thats very confusing really.

So, with his van and his wife was insured to drive as a named driver on his business policy, they could take that??

Doesn't make any sense as that is the main tool of his trade, and without that he couldn't work?

Edited by Alucidnation on Friday 27th May 08:15

BlackLabel

13,251 posts

123 months

Friday 27th May 2016
quotequote all
Alucidnation said:
Hmmmm, thats very confusing really.

So, with his van and his wife was insured to drive as a named driver on his business policy, they could take that??

Doesn't make any sense as that is the main tool of his trade, and without that he couldn't work?

Edited by Alucidnation on Friday 27th May 08:15
It appears they have two chances of seizing 'tools of the trade' - the law changed in 2014 and that set the £1,350 limit.

legalblog said:
3. ‘Tools of the Trade’ now subject to a financial limit

The old ‘get out’ for the sole trader that goods could not be seized because they were his ‘tools of the trade’ is now subject to a financial limit. Only ‘tools of the trade’ up to a maximum amount of £1,350 are exempt. So, if the enforcement agent finds goods in excess of that value, these can be seized
http://blogs.lexisnexis.co.uk/dr/new-enforcement-by-taking-control-of-goods-7-things-lawyer-needs-to-know/

And even if it's below this limit if they can prove that something isn't for the sole use of a trade they can take that too.




P-Jay

10,565 posts

191 months

Friday 27th May 2016
quotequote all
Alucidnation said:
I didn't think they could take "tools of the trade" with the computer guy at the end?
It wasn't mentioned in the show, but when I worked in finance we would almost never repo computer equipment -it's just not worth it. we'd threaten it, to to try to reach a resolution but in reality like shopfittings and catering equipment it's effectively worthless, but IT equipment is the absolute worst.

For example you repo a second-hand PC, the Repo / liquidators / Balifs usually know very little about computers, but even if they did they wont admit they do, so they'll take them whether it's a CAD workstation with dual Xeon Processors and a grands worth of GPU or a knackered Dual Core Duo from 5 years ago - they want paying all the same.

So you take possession of this PC/s and by default you become liable for the data held on it, so you can't just go turning them around at auction, to comply with the ICO guidelines you've got to securely dispose of the data element - in other words pay someone with the correct certification to destroy the HDD, "wiping" them doesn't do it, because if it forever reason falls into the 'wrong hands' even if someone ends up with someone else's holiday snaps you're in trouble.

If you 100% above board when you do this (and everyone in the finance industry really has to be) unless they've taken the boot disc with it - which they never do, because they're not looking for it and the previous owner almost never has it anyway you've lost the OS license too.

So if you're very lucky you start off with say a recent spec i5 based PC, it cost £350 + VAT new / £150 second-hand minus the cost of the bailiffs, the disposal, a new HDD and even an OS it's now a liability - the worse part is that if they take some old XP machine from 10 years ago it completely worthless before you've taken it, but now you've still got to pay for the disposal.

I'd bet that was more behind why they didn't take them.

S11Steve

6,374 posts

184 months

Friday 27th May 2016
quotequote all
It would seem that legitimate bailiff work is not as lucrative as DCBL would like, and they have had to tread the murky waters of private parking charge collection.

Good luck with that!

http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2016/05/ex...

DSLiverpool

14,743 posts

202 months

Friday 27th May 2016
quotequote all
S11Steve said:
It would seem that legitimate bailiff work is not as lucrative as DCBL would like, and they have had to tread the murky waters of private parking charge collection.

Good luck with that!

http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2016/05/ex...
They have 3 decent companies, the guy Steve Pinner on the TV is an owner of DCBL bailiffs - all 3 companies are small but healthy

BlackLabel

13,251 posts

123 months

Monday 30th May 2016
quotequote all
The last episode of this season airs tonight at 9pm.


Alucidnation

16,810 posts

170 months

Monday 30th May 2016
quotequote all
Starting off well this evening.

biggrin

Laurel Green

30,779 posts

232 months

Monday 30th May 2016
quotequote all
What's the matter with these chaps? They've been offered a tenner and are refusing to accept it. confused

Laurel Green

30,779 posts

232 months

Monday 30th May 2016
quotequote all
Blimey! This i s a tough one.

Oakey

27,566 posts

216 months

Monday 30th May 2016
quotequote all
If I was Mr Barratt I'd say "okay, you want me to prove all of this is mine, fine, pull up a fking chair cos you're going to be here all night" and then slowly find every receipt and go through every item.

Laurel Green

30,779 posts

232 months

Monday 30th May 2016
quotequote all
Haringey council are 'effing useless.

Alucidnation

16,810 posts

170 months

Monday 30th May 2016
quotequote all
Un fking believable.


BlackLabel

13,251 posts

123 months

Monday 30th May 2016
quotequote all
Laurel Green said:
Haringey council are 'effing useless.
Disgraceful behaviour by the council. And an amazing gesture by Paul/his company.