For The Love of Cars
Discussion
rubystone said:
Since when did dogs and tanks have anything to do with restoring a Transit?
Week by week this is becoming lass a car programme and more a light entertainment 'vehicle'. Pure tosh.
It wasn't billed as a car program.... It was billed as a social history program. I.e. It's about people and feelings and stuff. Hence the word "Love" in the title.Week by week this is becoming lass a car programme and more a light entertainment 'vehicle'. Pure tosh.
Since when did a program about how people feel about their past involving a particular vehicle, have to include a detailed description of the restoration?
What's tosh is people seeing Car in the title of a program. Then their brain going "ugg. Must watch. Has car. Like, must be I want." Without thinking about what the program is going to be....
Though I guess those people also watched Top Gear and complained it didn't have enough car reviews in it.
Munter said:
It wasn't billed as a car program.... It was billed as a social history program. I.e. It's about people and feelings and stuff. Hence the word "Love" in the title.
Since when did a program about how people feel about their past involving a particular vehicle, have to include a detailed description of the restoration?
What's tosh is people seeing Car in the title of a program. Then their brain going "ugg. Must watch. Has car. Like, must be I want." Without thinking about what the program is going to be....
Though I guess those people also watched Top Gear and complained it didn't have enough car reviews in it.
Ah ok, so it's changed from series 1? That too was entitled 'For The Love of Cars' and focussed on the restoration of a selection of cars. My mistake for assuming that series 2 of said programme, with same presenters and same title, might, just might, follow the same structure as series 1.Since when did a program about how people feel about their past involving a particular vehicle, have to include a detailed description of the restoration?
What's tosh is people seeing Car in the title of a program. Then their brain going "ugg. Must watch. Has car. Like, must be I want." Without thinking about what the program is going to be....
Though I guess those people also watched Top Gear and complained it didn't have enough car reviews in it.
Or in your terms Mr Munter 'ugg'
Munter said:
rubystone said:
Since when did dogs and tanks have anything to do with restoring a Transit?
Week by week this is becoming lass a car programme and more a light entertainment 'vehicle'. Pure tosh.
It wasn't billed as a car program.... It was billed as a social history program. I.e. It's about people and feelings and stuff. Hence the word "Love" in the title.Week by week this is becoming lass a car programme and more a light entertainment 'vehicle'. Pure tosh.
Since when did a program about how people feel about their past involving a particular vehicle, have to include a detailed description of the restoration?
What's tosh is people seeing Car in the title of a program. Then their brain going "ugg. Must watch. Has car. Like, must be I want." Without thinking about what the program is going to be....
Though I guess those people also watched Top Gear and complained it didn't have enough car reviews in it.
rubystone said:
Ah ok, so it's changed from series 1? That too was entitled 'For The Love of Cars' and focussed on the restoration of a selection of cars. My mistake for assuming that series 2 of said programme, with same presenters and same title, might, just might, follow the same structure as series 1.
Or in your terms Mr Munter 'ugg'
It does follow the same structure as series 1. The majority of the program is not focussed on the restoration. Hence all the time spent going off road in a mk1 landy, and playing with old boy racers in mk1 escorts etc. It was about the people in the 1st series. And it's about the people in the 2nd.Or in your terms Mr Munter 'ugg'
AmiableChimp said:
When the auction for the Transit started, and you saw a picture of "the" van appear on the screen behind the auctioneer with lot no, etc. did the one on screen have a sliding driver's door?
I thought they used pictures of the actual vehicles?!
I noticed that too - guess they didn't have time to get the photo up of the actual van so used a library shot.I thought they used pictures of the actual vehicles?!
Laurel Green said:
AmiableChimp said:
When the auction for the Transit started, and you saw a picture of "the" van appear on the screen behind the auctioneer with lot no, etc. did the one on screen have a sliding driver's door?
I thought they used pictures of the actual vehicles?!
I noticed that too - guess they didn't have time to get the photo up of the actual van so used a library shot.I thought they used pictures of the actual vehicles?!
Gassing Station | TV, Film, Video Streaming & Radio | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff