Alan Turing, Bletchley Park, Benedict Cumberbatch.

Alan Turing, Bletchley Park, Benedict Cumberbatch.

Author
Discussion

Zad

12,698 posts

236 months

Friday 21st November 2014
quotequote all
He does tend to be a wee bit "Benedict Cumberbatch stars as Benedict Cumberbatch in..."

He's been around for years in Radio 4 / 4 Extra plays, probably better on there really as he got more free reign to play different characters.

AndyWoodall

2,624 posts

259 months

Saturday 22nd November 2014
quotequote all
Off to see this tomorrow, very much looking forward to it.

rover 623gsi

5,230 posts

161 months

Saturday 22nd November 2014
quotequote all
saw it the other day - was looking forward to it and it was even better than I hoped

Ozone

3,043 posts

187 months

Thursday 27th November 2014
quotequote all
Very enjoyable film, not too long or technical.

RegMolehusband

3,959 posts

257 months

Wednesday 3rd December 2014
quotequote all
I saw it this evening. A very good and enjoyable film spoiled for me by their use of the word "smart" several times when in the 40's surely they would have said "clever" or "intelligent". The screenplay was written by American Graham Moore sadly. I'm surprised Benedict or others didn't correct the writer on this.

Smart in those days would have meant well dressed.

Oh yes, and according to the sub titles at the end of the film Turing was "honored". For me this was all very annoying in something intended to be very British.

Edited by RegMolehusband on Thursday 4th December 11:49

Vocal Minority

8,582 posts

152 months

Thursday 15th January 2015
quotequote all
Finally saw it last Saturday. A very interesting biopic - Cumberbatch was good, and it was a good story in isolation.

However, I beseech anyone who sees this (looking at you America), not to think you have learned some 'history' though.

A lot of it was portrayed as quaint and British - one bloke in a shed deciphering all the messages on his own Enigma machine, only 6 code-brekaers and one MI6 person knowing it was broken and playing God? - I grant you the broad principal of using the information very sparingly held good - but Bletchley Park was a code breaking factory employing 9000 people by the end of the war...

Also - the use of 'smart' stood out like a sore thumb and I know every film needs a 'bad guy' - but surely the portrayal of poor old Alistair Denniston was nothing short of a character assassination?

Sorry - I wish I could help this sort of smug bhing, but I can't. I may need help.

Also - and I am sure EricMC can answer this. Was the Bombe ever known as Christopher - don't recall it?

Crafty_

13,279 posts

200 months

Thursday 15th January 2015
quotequote all
Bombe came from "bomba kryptologiczna", so named by the Polish guys (Rejewski, Zygalski and Różycki), apparently after an ice cream. They didn't create the bombe machine but devised the methods it used.

I've never heard of a bombe called anything but that and am not aware of any being given a pet name.

Its probably more bullst made up by some script writer somewhere.

If you want the real story this is a great book: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Enigma-Battle-Cassell-Mili...

If you want to get really complicated Gordon Welchman wrote a book called "The hut 6 story", you won't get much loser to the truth than from someone like him!

Loads of other books on Bletchley too, all of which are probably far more worthwhile than some random story that was made up for a movie.

One I haven't got yet is a sort of biography of Dilly Knox by Mavis Batey (nee Lever), she was one of Dilly Knox's girls, she met and married Keith Batey whilst working at Bletchley. Should be interesting that one.

vescaegg

25,529 posts

167 months

Thursday 15th January 2015
quotequote all
Really need to see this.

Up for best picture at Oscars now with Cumberbatch and Knightly up for best leads too.


BryanC

1,107 posts

238 months

Thursday 15th January 2015
quotequote all
vescaegg said:
Really need to see this.

Up for best picture at Oscars now with Cumberbatch and Knightly up for best leads too.
Best picture ??????
TBH The Imitation Game and I'll include Budapest Hotel were surely the best of a bad lot.

Of course I've been entertained in 2014 with Equaliser, Fury etc etc but rather disappointed about the mush this year that has 'emperor's clothes' stamped over them. I'm sure 'The Budget' has something to do with it but I'm putting my head over the parapet and saying I would like to have seen better.

vescaegg

25,529 posts

167 months

Thursday 15th January 2015
quotequote all
I haven't seen it either but from what people have said who have, it's probably going to go to The Theory of Everything.

gpo746

3,397 posts

130 months

Thursday 15th January 2015
quotequote all
liked it

Also made me revisit Enigma as well.

DJRC

23,563 posts

236 months

Friday 16th January 2015
quotequote all
Thought it was astoundingly fking dull to be honest.

Pit Pony

8,496 posts

121 months

Friday 16th January 2015
quotequote all
226bhp said:
I watched this last night and thought it excellent. I wonder if Benedict Cumberbatch is in danger of getting typecast into playing people with Aspergers, not a bad thing as it's something he does do very well.....
Whilst it is generally accepted that Turing probably had Aspergers, he may not have.

He probably didn't commit suicide either.

ShiningWit

10,203 posts

128 months

Friday 16th January 2015
quotequote all
Pit Pony said:
226bhp said:
I watched this last night and thought it excellent. I wonder if Benedict Cumberbatch is in danger of getting typecast into playing people with Aspergers, not a bad thing as it's something he does do very well.....
Whilst it is generally accepted that Turing probably had Aspergers, he may not have.

He probably didn't commit suicide either.
We will never know (It hadn't even been recognised then), but lack of poetic licence would make for a very dull film.

RegMolehusband

3,959 posts

257 months

Friday 16th January 2015
quotequote all
As I said above, I enjoyed the film to some extent but I will never add the DVD to my collection because the use of the word "smart" grates too much.

I'm surprised that Cumberbatch didn't point out to the American writer that Turing and his peers would never have said this.

Vocal Minority

8,582 posts

152 months

Friday 16th January 2015
quotequote all
Also - Brits from the 1940's fire guns, not people.

An RN Commander CERTAINLY doesn't 'fire' people.

clonmult

10,529 posts

209 months

Friday 16th January 2015
quotequote all
RegMolehusband said:
As I said above, I enjoyed the film to some extent but I will never add the DVD to my collection because the use of the word "smart" grates too much.

I'm surprised that Cumberbatch didn't point out to the American writer that Turing and his peers would never have said this.
He probably did, but was ignored. Or thought as much and didn't bother saying.

Overall it was definitely enjoyable, surprisingly so. Maybe a little too much "creative license", but if that gives more people even the slightest insight into Bletchley park and Turing, that has to be a good thing.

Trevatanus

11,120 posts

150 months

Monday 1st August 2016
quotequote all
Watched this last night. Brilliant movie.
The way he was treated absolutely stinks.
I realise that it was how this country was back then, but very sad, nonetheless.

Jonesy23

4,650 posts

136 months

Monday 1st August 2016
quotequote all
Thought it was a bit light to be honest. Almost felt like watching something written for a stage production if that makes sense? In terms of scene structures/limited locations/restricted cast numbers.

It got some of the story of Turing across but was so simplified I'm not sure it was really worth it.

Zad

12,698 posts

236 months

Monday 1st August 2016
quotequote all
I'm glad I didn't go to the cinema to see it. Vast swathes of it were nowhere near the truth. I'm sure it made for a better film for American audiences, but there was very little fact in it. I won't bother you with all the details. Great for raising the profile of one of the most important people ever in world history (and Alan Turing too) but not much relation to what actually happened.