James May's Cars of the People
Discussion
Janluke said:
Max_Torque said:
Lordbenny said:
This is just like Top Gear without the two other presenters!
Just like? Hardly. It's way better! ;-)Scuffers said:
The Don of Croy said:
But no mention of the Jensen FF?
he missed out a lot of cars, notably:Jenson FF
Ford Cosworth (Escort, Sierra & Granada)
Subaru Legacy/SVX/MV/Justy (all pre-Impreza)
Austin Champ (and Wolseley Mudlark)
the list goes on...
Enjoyed it, though not as much as last time as 4x4s don't really interest me that much. Bit that made me spit my beer out was when he said Audi rocked up with 4wd and shook the scene up (they did) until the end of Grp B (they didn't - the Quattro was pretty old hat after the first 2-3 years).
If I remember rightly (and I was 3yrs old at the time, so I may not) the Quattro did indeed turn up and destroy everything in its path, but then Lancia, Ford and mainly Peugeot went away, built mid-engined 4wd cars and the Quattro's reign was over. I could be wrong, but I thought the 205 T16 was the daddy of the Grp B cars?
When discussing the origins of the Willys Jeep, May mentioned that 180 manufacturers were approached to design the utility vehicle which the Army had in mind. 180????
Surely by the advent of WW2 the number of American marques can't have been that many? The Depression and the formation of major conglomerates like GM would have seen to that. Wouldn't it? Any thoughts?
I suppose the number could have included truck makers, maybe aircraft makers and engineering firms, but you'd have thought that in view of the short time allowed, they would have concentrated on established makers. And to think that little Bantam were the only ones who could come up with the goods.
Surely by the advent of WW2 the number of American marques can't have been that many? The Depression and the formation of major conglomerates like GM would have seen to that. Wouldn't it? Any thoughts?
I suppose the number could have included truck makers, maybe aircraft makers and engineering firms, but you'd have thought that in view of the short time allowed, they would have concentrated on established makers. And to think that little Bantam were the only ones who could come up with the goods.
nicanary said:
When discussing the origins of the Willys Jeep, May mentioned that 180 manufacturers were approached to design the utility vehicle which the Army had in mind. 180????
Surely by the advent of WW2 the number of American marques can't have been that many? The Depression and the formation of major conglomerates like GM would have seen to that. Wouldn't it? Any thoughts?
I suppose the number could have included truck makers, maybe aircraft makers and engineering firms, but you'd have thought that in view of the short time allowed, they would have concentrated on established makers. And to think that little Bantam were the only ones who could come up with the goods.
according to Wiki:Surely by the advent of WW2 the number of American marques can't have been that many? The Depression and the formation of major conglomerates like GM would have seen to that. Wouldn't it? Any thoughts?
I suppose the number could have included truck makers, maybe aircraft makers and engineering firms, but you'd have thought that in view of the short time allowed, they would have concentrated on established makers. And to think that little Bantam were the only ones who could come up with the goods.
Wiki said:
Anxious to have one in time for America's entry into World War II, the U.S. Army solicited proposals from domestic automobile manufacturers for a replacement for its existing, aging light motor vehicles, mainly motorcycles and sidecars, and some Ford Model T's.[4][5] Marmon-Herrington presented five 4×4 Fords in 1937, and American Bantam delivered three Austin roadsters in 1938.[6] Recognizing the need to create standard specifications, the Army formalized its requirements on July 11, 1940, and submitted them to 135 U.S. automotive manufacturers.
so, 135? sound more reasonable, remember there were a lot of car/bike/aero manufacturers back then making very low volume stuff, much like American Austin Car Company that came up with the Jeep.Otispunkmeyer said:
So a fight between an army of Hilux and one of Russian tanks, and the former came out on top? What?!
Yephttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toyota_War
It was against Libya though
Stick an ATGM on the back of a fast moving pick up & they can fire & be gone very quickly
Im sure French air support helped a bit too!
Scuffers said:
he missed out a lot of cars, notably:
Jenson FF
Ford Cosworth (Escort, Sierra & Granada)
Subaru Legacy/SVX/MV/Justy (all pre-Impreza)
Austin Champ (and Wolseley Mudlark)
the list goes on...
Yes- but editing a programme down to an hour is essentially about what you leave out. Jensen FF was very much a prophet without honour and should perhaps have been mentioned , also the Ferguson R5 . I don't see the point in mentioning any of the Fords (to which can be added Mondeo btw , CApri (rallycross version ) and prototype 4x4 Mustangs ) as for a time everybody had a 4x4- even the Cavalier and Calibra and none of the Fords was especially noteworthy from a driveline perspective . Agree re Subaru - a prophet with honour I think. Champ-more at home on Salisbury Plain ....The deservedly forgotten Austin Gypsy?Jenson FF
Ford Cosworth (Escort, Sierra & Granada)
Subaru Legacy/SVX/MV/Justy (all pre-Impreza)
Austin Champ (and Wolseley Mudlark)
the list goes on...
An excellent effort I thought anyway .
Riley Blue said:
I thought last night's programme dragged a bit and each segment could have been pared down. That would have left time for a bit more info on the mechanics of each four-wheel drive system, something I would have appreciated but maybe that's just me...
I found last night's episode weaker than the first.The driving segment didn't add much, whereas the first episode was a lot more interesting in terms of history, the passengers, and the backdrop of decaying Detroit, etc
Still much better than most (heavily padded) TG episodes.
Chris Type R said:
Riley Blue said:
I thought last night's programme dragged a bit and each segment could have been pared down. That would have left time for a bit more info on the mechanics of each four-wheel drive system, something I would have appreciated but maybe that's just me...
I found last night's episode weaker than the first.The driving segment didn't add much, whereas the first episode was a lot more interesting in terms of history, the passengers, and the backdrop of decaying Detroit, etc
Still much better than most (heavily padded) TG episodes.
The entire programme just showed how Top Gear could and should have been. Yes it could have been tighter, but without the silly childish tttishness that Top Gear had become, it was a pleasure to watch.
When I heard that Quattro though, I actually got goosebumps on my arms. The LWB Ur wasn't the best rally car by a long mark, but I still think it looks the best. Vaguely disappointed that they didn't have the XR4x4 on from a previous series though. It matched the remit for a peoples' 4x4.
When I heard that Quattro though, I actually got goosebumps on my arms. The LWB Ur wasn't the best rally car by a long mark, but I still think it looks the best. Vaguely disappointed that they didn't have the XR4x4 on from a previous series though. It matched the remit for a peoples' 4x4.
Gassing Station | TV, Film, Video Streaming & Radio | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff