Grand Designs - New Series

Author
Discussion

Evoluzione

10,345 posts

243 months

Wednesday 8th October 2014
quotequote all
TV guide said:
Natasha Cargill wants to build a home shaped like two enormous periscopes in rural Norfolk, but to obtain planning permission, she has to ensure not only that the materials are sustainable, but also agree to measure the transportation used to deliver them. If these strict criteria are not met, she won't be allowed to live there, and to add to the pressure, she has just £330,000 to spend on construction, six months to complete the project and Lothario Kevin McCloud attempting to kick her back doors in.
Sounds good tonight!

Sway

26,278 posts

194 months

Wednesday 8th October 2014
quotequote all
hehe

Have to say the restrictions from the planners sound fking ridiculous. How on earth can they state 'you can start building but you won't be able to live in it unless...'? wkers.

There's a reason why the vast majority of homes across the country are identikit red brick McWimpey monstrosities.

Round all the over important wkers up against the wall, and put in place a system where innovation, good design and good living are prioritised.

Tossers.

Laurel Green

30,780 posts

232 months

Wednesday 8th October 2014
quotequote all
Evoluzione said:
TV guide said:
Natasha Cargill wants to build a home shaped like two enormous periscopes in rural Norfolk, but to obtain planning permission, she has to ensure not only that the materials are sustainable, but also agree to measure the transportation used to deliver them. If these strict criteria are not met, she won't be allowed to live there, and to add to the pressure, she has just £330,000 to spend on construction, six months to complete the project and Lothario Kevin McCloud attempting to kick her back doors in.
Sounds good tonight!
I'm looking forward to this but, not as much as Natasha Cargill. wink

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

54 months

Wednesday 8th October 2014
quotequote all
Although we won't know until tonight, I would guess the planners only gave permission because of certain promises from the applicant.

People often say anything to get their permission and then conveniently forget so the planners need to make permission conditional.

Of course, they can also be meddling, small minded aholes smile

Will be interesting to see which one it is tonight.

CMYKguru

3,017 posts

175 months

Wednesday 8th October 2014
quotequote all
garyhun said:
Although we won't know until tonight, I would guess the planners only gave permission because of certain promises from the applicant.

People often say anything to get their permission and then conveniently forget so the planners need to make permission conditional.

Of course, they can also be meddling, small minded aholes smile

Will be interesting to see which one it is tonight.
The amount of planning applications i've read were the person has attempted to do the application themselves and made a right arse of things.

One example was a piece of land near a nature reserve and meadow with wild flowers and other delightful flora and fauna which was bought without permission but with the intention of building a mansion on.

Part of the planning actually contained the sentence. " Currently the site is a wasteland covered in weeds, building a structure of such unique grandeur would not only improve but enhance the landscape"

Nobody seemed to mention that the wasteland was a meadow and he had as much chance of getting permission to build on it as I have going to Mars.

ajprice

27,490 posts

196 months

Wednesday 8th October 2014
quotequote all
Eco house set into a hill. £330k. 28 year old architect. Hmmm. Looks alright if it works out.

ikarl

3,730 posts

199 months

Wednesday 8th October 2014
quotequote all
Surely it can't end up as a 2 bedroom though....

FourWheelDrift

88,537 posts

284 months

Wednesday 8th October 2014
quotequote all
Why not have one long glass side on the 1st floor instead of two smaller bits? The wings lose a lot of the impact of the views, like wearing blinkers.

WinstonWolf

72,857 posts

239 months

Wednesday 8th October 2014
quotequote all
How will the planners know? Sounds like they've got their heads so far up their own arses it's permanently dark.

marksx

5,052 posts

190 months

Wednesday 8th October 2014
quotequote all
I missed the opening. What was the reason for such constraints/requirements?

BoRED S2upid

19,704 posts

240 months

Wednesday 8th October 2014
quotequote all
Anyone know anything about code 6 building? She has to get 90 points ok but how many could she get? 90/500 or 90/100? I notice there's no ground source heat pump surely that would add a few points.

ajprice

27,490 posts

196 months

Wednesday 8th October 2014
quotequote all
marksx said:
I missed the opening. What was the reason for such constraints/requirements?
Eco code 6 standards.

ikarl

3,730 posts

199 months

Wednesday 8th October 2014
quotequote all
ajprice said:
marksx said:
I missed the opening. What was the reason for such constraints/requirements?
Eco code 6 standards.
It's because it's in open countryside. Outside a conservation village

castex

4,936 posts

273 months

Wednesday 8th October 2014
quotequote all
FourWheelDrift said:
Why not have one long glass side on the 1st floor instead of two smaller bits? The wings lose a lot of the impact of the views, like wearing blinkers.
I think the house would look worse like that, rather giving it the look of a plush office and losing the charismatic magnet/horseshoe-like shaping that it has in the plans.
You'd also lose some of the separation element, the sitting/music room being about calm and culture and feeling far enough away from all that kitchen-diner racket despite the relatively compact footprint. I've high hopes for this place.

ikarl

3,730 posts

199 months

Wednesday 8th October 2014
quotequote all
The old family home looks 'alright'

dom9

8,079 posts

209 months

Wednesday 8th October 2014
quotequote all
ikarl said:
The old family home looks 'alright'
Gorgeous!

Halfway through the program and there doesn't appear to be a huge amount of actual building progress!!

marksx

5,052 posts

190 months

Wednesday 8th October 2014
quotequote all
ikarl said:
The old family home looks 'alright'
Yeah, not bad I suppose.

biggrin

Magog

2,652 posts

189 months

Wednesday 8th October 2014
quotequote all
I'm guessing their weren't any dropped-h's on the planning application, otherwise it wouldn't have got through.

castex

4,936 posts

273 months

Wednesday 8th October 2014
quotequote all
Tottyscope up! Totty at four o'clock.

ikarl

3,730 posts

199 months

Wednesday 8th October 2014
quotequote all
Missing out on cat6, but surely they knew the rules etc?!