GHOSTBUSTERS 3
Discussion
Mr Snrub said:
stephen300o said:
Its becoming just a bandwagon thing, folks just hopping on to say how terrible it is, slagging it off, thumb downing it here and there. How about just not watching it.
Even that isn't enough to appease the SJWshttp://www.deathandtaxesmag.com/291025/ghostbuster...
Halb said:
Yeah.
The sad ting about Ernie's role is that it was reduced from a General who helped set up the thing to some johnny-come-lately who comes on as a basic handyman.
I do get to use the line frequently at work. "If there's a steady paycheck in it, I'll believe anything you say" though due to this. The sad ting about Ernie's role is that it was reduced from a General who helped set up the thing to some johnny-come-lately who comes on as a basic handyman.
Halb said:
Yeah.
The sad ting about Ernie's role is that it was reduced from a General who helped set up the thing to some johnny-come-lately who comes on as a basic handyman.
But it fit quite well with the film. The sad ting about Ernie's role is that it was reduced from a General who helped set up the thing to some johnny-come-lately who comes on as a basic handyman.
Once they were set up and all the sciency stuff was built - Ghostbusting seemed to become a pretty mundane job akin to refuse collecting (until all the Gozer stuff kicked off). At the time Ernie's character was introduced, they didn't need A.N.Other scientist or a military general on the team - they needed a grafter who wasn't afraid to get his hands dirty.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NFX4fmldZFs
Moonhawk said:
But it fit quite well with the film.
Once they were set up and all the sciency stuff was built - Ghostbusting seemed to become a pretty mundane job akin to refuse collecting (until all the Gozer stuff kicked off). At the time Ernie's character was introduced, they didn't need A.N.Other scientist or a military general on the team - they needed a grafter who wasn't afraid to get his hands dirty.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NFX4fmldZFs
In the film that they rewrote, yes.Once they were set up and all the sciency stuff was built - Ghostbusting seemed to become a pretty mundane job akin to refuse collecting (until all the Gozer stuff kicked off). At the time Ernie's character was introduced, they didn't need A.N.Other scientist or a military general on the team - they needed a grafter who wasn't afraid to get his hands dirty.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NFX4fmldZFs
Ghostbusters 3 theme tune, Fall Out Boy Ft Missy Elliot...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2AQ44nPrRTM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2AQ44nPrRTM
extraT said:
Ghostbusters 3 theme tune, Fall Out Boy Ft Missy Elliot...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2AQ44nPrRTM
What the fhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2AQ44nPrRTM
k have they done! 
Halb said:
It's no that bad...but it's basically using the old tune and lyrics...and the logo....they wanna use up every shred of goodwill from that most awesome film...ffs nothing new, let them create and let it stand more on it's own.
Unfortunately this is the way with Hollywood these days, because of the absolutely huge sums of money involved, they almost can't afford to take any risks so there will be focus groups working on exactly that, using up every shred of good will of the originals.To be honest I'm surprised we get any different\risky films at all and yet every year we seem to get at least a few which break the mould. Deadpool is an example, that film should never have been made but somehow they did and against all odds it's done really well in the box office, proof if it where needed that focus groups aren't the be all and end all.
Gassing Station | TV, Film, Video Streaming & Radio | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff