Top Gear Series 22
Discussion
MartG said:
fatboy18 said:
And what about all the incidents that happen on a bit of grass with two Goals on the end? Suárez the biting creature? That other bloke Gerrard from Liverpool stamping on another players leg that could of resulted in a break? Assault in my book 
You might call it sport but they are also paid employees so why should they be exempt?
Precisely ! You might call it sport but they are also paid employees so why should they be exempt?gwm said:
Beverley TurnerFamous for being s
t at F1 when it was on ITV and married to the far more talented James Cracknell. Though if you believe her drivel. As the wife she's the one who made him what he is today...Wonder where the producer will turn up next?
Rich_W said:
Beverley Turner
Famous for being st at F1 when it was on ITV and married to the far more talented James Cracknell. Though if you believe her drivel. As the wife she's the one who made him what he is today...
Wonder where the producer will turn up next?
Never heard of Beverley Turner before, however a quick Google images search seems to suggest she could have a career helping sellers in this thread?Famous for being s
t at F1 when it was on ITV and married to the far more talented James Cracknell. Though if you believe her drivel. As the wife she's the one who made him what he is today...Wonder where the producer will turn up next?
http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&a...
boxst said:
I hope that they show all the pre-recorded things from the last three episodes that those three did. I assume there is no contractual problem with doing that as those were made during the contract and they would still get some sort of royalty?
Assuming that they'd done the editing, voice overs etc. Clarkson said there was still a lot to do, maybe it included sorting out the stuff they'd already shot.I read last night that the BBC are now going back to Clarkson to employ him for Top Gear Live shows as there is a potential fall out of £10m if he is not headlining.
Also they can't name it Top Gear Live as it was not part of the franchise that was sold under the top gear brand.
Interesting if the above is all factually correct.
Also they can't name it Top Gear Live as it was not part of the franchise that was sold under the top gear brand.
Interesting if the above is all factually correct.
Du1point8 said:
I read last night that the BBC are now going back to Clarkson to employ him for Top Gear Live shows as there is a potential fall out of £10m if he is not headlining.
Also they can't name it Top Gear Live as it was not part of the franchise that was sold under the top gear brand.
Interesting if the above is all factually correct.
Doubt it to be honest. Also they can't name it Top Gear Live as it was not part of the franchise that was sold under the top gear brand.
Interesting if the above is all factually correct.
A) clarkson will tell them to do one
B) there will be a fall out from other broadcasting companies that bought the right to this series which now can't be shown as promised.
If they carry on employing him in any way on or off TV it makes a complete farce of sacking him in the first place.
You cannot sack someone because of their behaviour, an then decide to re-employ them when it is convenient!
If they are going to lose 10m because he's not there then thats the BBC's problem, and one they should of taken into account when sacking him in the first place.
You cannot sack someone because of their behaviour, an then decide to re-employ them when it is convenient!
If they are going to lose 10m because he's not there then thats the BBC's problem, and one they should of taken into account when sacking him in the first place.
moanthebairns said:
Du1point8 said:
I read last night that the BBC are now going back to Clarkson to employ him for Top Gear Live shows as there is a potential fall out of £10m if he is not headlining.
Also they can't name it Top Gear Live as it was not part of the franchise that was sold under the top gear brand.
Interesting if the above is all factually correct.
Doubt it to be honest. Also they can't name it Top Gear Live as it was not part of the franchise that was sold under the top gear brand.
Interesting if the above is all factually correct.
A) clarkson will tell them to do one
B) there will be a fall out from other broadcasting companies that bought the right to this series which now can't be shown as promised.
djdest said:
If they carry on employing him in any way on or off TV it makes a complete farce of sacking him in the first place.
You cannot sack someone because of their behaviour, an then decide to re-employ them when it is convenient!
If they are going to lose 10m because he's not there then thats the BBC's problem, and one they should of taken into account when sacking him in the first place.
Don't know that it makes much difference but they didn't sack him, they just didn't renew his contract.You cannot sack someone because of their behaviour, an then decide to re-employ them when it is convenient!
If they are going to lose 10m because he's not there then thats the BBC's problem, and one they should of taken into account when sacking him in the first place.
Gassing Station | TV, Film, Video Streaming & Radio | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff