Clarkson in trouble again...

Author
Discussion

Durzel

12,264 posts

168 months

Thursday 26th March 2015
quotequote all
telecat said:
You Quote Saville and believe the BBC account? No video, No information from a Hospital, No gossip from any NHS workers and his colleagues state it was a "storm in a teacup"? Other reports are that Oisin threw a punch. And his co-workers are staying with him. Again the BBC has a rap sheet for this. If the face does not fit they find a reason to let their contracts lapse. And When it comes to it Clarkson has not been dismissed, sacked or terminated. His contract will continue but will not be renewed.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-32076...

Still think the producer threw a punch? Or maybe it isn't actually Clarkson in the video but a simulacrum, it is after all a BBC News article.

swisstoni

16,985 posts

279 months

Thursday 26th March 2015
quotequote all
Are we to believe that this bloke just stood there to be verbally assaulted for 20 mins, and then physically assaulted with no response? Or was it an argument followed by a punch-up from which he emerged the worse?
I know which sounds more likely to me.

LuS1fer

41,133 posts

245 months

Thursday 26th March 2015
quotequote all

Police won't necessarily get involved without a complaint which, as I understand it, has not been forthcoming.

Assault is also a civil tort and a remedy in damages can be sought for the injury and loss of income.
Thus if there was a claim - and I don't know if there is - minimising the victim's "fallout" from the incident is always going to be a wise move or you get into the realms of "he'll never work again loss of income" territory.

Walford

2,259 posts

166 months

Thursday 26th March 2015
quotequote all
Lets hope this doesent get blown out of proportion

bad company

18,574 posts

266 months

Thursday 26th March 2015
quotequote all
Walford said:
Lets hope this doesent get blown out of proportion
I would say it already has.

irocfan

40,431 posts

190 months

Thursday 26th March 2015
quotequote all
otolith said:
Metaphor for TG with a new team;

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4JFkHuIUwF0
or as an export product


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VYOc2jgkBMQ

ch108

1,127 posts

133 months

Thursday 26th March 2015
quotequote all
Sky have said they won't be signing Clarkson.

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2015/03/26/jeremy-...

Halb

53,012 posts

183 months

Thursday 26th March 2015
quotequote all
ch108 said:
Sky have said they won't be signing Clarkson.

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2015/03/26/jeremy-...
Seems smart by Sky. Sky have grown up a lot.
It'd be best for JC to get himself sorted out and return in triumph to the Beeb.
I can see the Netflix thing happening perhaps, Netflix is young and more reckless. The gamble there is if JC disappears into obscurity on an invisible 'channel.'

George111

6,930 posts

251 months

Thursday 26th March 2015
quotequote all
Halb said:
ch108 said:
Sky have said they won't be signing Clarkson.

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2015/03/26/jeremy-...
Seems smart by Sky. Sky have grown up a lot.
It'd be best for JC to get himself sorted out and return in triumph to the Beeb.
I can see the Netflix thing happening perhaps, Netflix is young and more reckless. The gamble there is if JC disappears into obscurity on an invisible 'channel.'
And you believe a word Sky says ? If they can get Clarkson, May and the other one then they will make a fortune from them . . . and they know it. Why would anybody believe a statement like this at this stage ?

Toaster

2,939 posts

193 months

Thursday 26th March 2015
quotequote all
George111 said:
And you believe a word Sky says ? If they can get Clarkson, May and the other one then they will make a fortune from them . . . and they know it. Why would anybody believe a statement like this at this stage ?
Actually yes I do, Clarkson, May and hammond are very rich individuals already they don't need TG, and Sky doesn't need to be seen as the corporate that condones violence it could hurt their revenue stream sponsors / advertisers do not want their image tarnished so if you think Clarkson is just going to repeat his antics from TG with Sky you may be waiting a very long time

ch108

1,127 posts

133 months

Thursday 26th March 2015
quotequote all
George111 said:
Halb said:
ch108 said:
Sky have said they won't be signing Clarkson.

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2015/03/26/jeremy-...
Seems smart by Sky. Sky have grown up a lot.
It'd be best for JC to get himself sorted out and return in triumph to the Beeb.
I can see the Netflix thing happening perhaps, Netflix is young and more reckless. The gamble there is if JC disappears into obscurity on an invisible 'channel.'
And you believe a word Sky says ? If they can get Clarkson, May and the other one then they will make a fortune from them . . . and they know it. Why would anybody believe a statement like this at this stage ?
It could be a bluff of course at this stage until everything settles down. However maybe they just aren't interested. Sky don't strike me as the sort of company that necessarily need the money at any cost. Clarkson has proved himself to be a handful and possibly a liability. Maybe its not worth the risk and hassle to them. But time will tell I suppose.

Would be funny if the channel Dave took them on and actually broadcast the old TG crew in a new show instead of old TG repeats!

LuS1fer

41,133 posts

245 months

Thursday 26th March 2015
quotequote all
Angus Deayton turned up in Waterloo Road as an ill-dressed teacher. You never know...

jagmad

2 posts

109 months

Friday 27th March 2015
quotequote all
Durzel said:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-32076...

Still think the producer threw a punch? Or maybe it isn't actually Clarkson in the video but a simulacrum, it is after all a BBC News article.
See I told you the only winners would be the lawyers::
Snippet taken from BBC link above.
North Yorkshire Police are also looking into the incident, which took place at a local hotel.
"We have a duty to investigate where we believe an offence might have been committed, and that is what we have been doing with this case," a spokesperson said.
"As is usual in these circumstances, we have made contact with Mr Tymon through his lawyers, to ask him to speak to us so we can ascertain how he wishes to pursue this matter."

Reminds me of a Yorkshire saying: "Nothing changes septhaircuts"

RowntreesCabana

1,796 posts

254 months

Friday 27th March 2015
quotequote all
My guess for his replacement is Idris Alba. After the last few years and controversy from Clarkson, they'll see this as an opportunity to tick a few boxes and move away from the old school.

Durzel

12,264 posts

168 months

Friday 27th March 2015
quotequote all
James May was a joy to watch when he did that homemade Action Man rocket programme, he can certainly carry a show on his own and one could argue that when unshackled from the "Captain Slow" persona he has to play on TG he shines. An inventions show really suits his kind of fastidiousness and attention to detail.

I'm not as sold on Hammond as a sole presenter, personally, but he's demonstrated capability at it.

My gut feeling is that both of them will want to continue in some capacity at the BBC, because ultimately they have already and could continue to make a good living from them outside of TG. I can't see them poisoning the well myself by resigning.

Mr Taxpayer

438 posts

120 months

Friday 27th March 2015
quotequote all
Russel Brand seems to have healed his BBC rift; he was hosting Comic Relief two weeks ago.

aeropilot

34,574 posts

227 months

Friday 27th March 2015
quotequote all
Mr Taxpayer said:
Russel Brand seems to have healed his BBC rift; he was hosting Comic Relief two weeks ago.
BBC culture changes with the tide - or rather whoever is sitting in the top seat. Clarkson could easily return to BBC at some point in future whenever a new boss is appointed.

However, that depends on whether he actually wants to, or rather wants to continue with TG or a motoring related programme, and I'm not convinced he does.


anonymous-user

54 months

Friday 27th March 2015
quotequote all
aeropilot said:
BBC culture changes with the tide - or rather whoever is sitting in the top seat. Clarkson could easily return to BBC at some point in future whenever a new boss is appointed.

However, that depends on whether he actually wants to, or rather wants to continue with TG or a motoring related programme, and I'm not convinced he does.
Agreed. In addition, listening to/reading the comments from JM and RH, they too are suggesting it's well and truly over for the three amigos.
RH has been typically quiet but did tweet "it's been a hell of a ride".....past tense.
JM has said very similar things, and posted a photo of him and Clarkson in a man-hug with the caption "And goodbye...."
They've all had time to reflect, and my money's on them each coming to the conclusion this is the exit opportunity they all needed, even if it's not quite the circumstances they would've chosen.

aeropilot

34,574 posts

227 months

Friday 27th March 2015
quotequote all
Crossflow Kid said:
aeropilot said:
BBC culture changes with the tide - or rather whoever is sitting in the top seat. Clarkson could easily return to BBC at some point in future whenever a new boss is appointed.

However, that depends on whether he actually wants to, or rather wants to continue with TG or a motoring related programme, and I'm not convinced he does.
Agreed. In addition, listening to/reading the comments from JM and RH, they too are suggesting it's well and truly over for the three amigos.
RH has been typically quiet but did tweet "it's been a hell of a ride".....past tense.
JM has said very similar things, and posted a photo of him and Clarkson in a man-hug with the caption "And goodbye...."
They've all had time to reflect, and my money's on them each coming to the conclusion this is the exit opportunity they all needed, even if it's not quite the circumstances they would've chosen.
There's a small conspiracy theory in my head that wonders if the 3 of them haven't actually hatched the whole plot deliberately as a way of avoiding the whole last ever episode, farewell situation, and being left in a position where pressure and popular opinion could be brought to bear to pressure them into continuing TG.
This way, it's the BBC's fault and it just abruptly ends the way it has.
Maybe it's just the blasee way they seem to be taking it all, and combined with the few throw away comments earlier in the series, just makes me wonder a little......... smile


anonymous-user

54 months

Friday 27th March 2015
quotequote all
aeropilot said:
There's a small conspiracy theory in my head that wonders if the 3 of them haven't actually hatched the whole plot deliberately as a way of avoiding the whole last ever episode
That crossed my mind too. Bit of an "Easy Rider" closing scene, if you get my meaning?