Batman v. Superman: Dawn of Justice

Batman v. Superman: Dawn of Justice

Author
Discussion

ukaskew

10,642 posts

221 months

Monday 28th March 2016
quotequote all
Will be interesting to see the second week drop now most of the people who were going to see it regardless have been. We've been planning the trip to see it for months (next Friday) but have abandoned it now.

Rick_1138

3,676 posts

178 months

Monday 28th March 2016
quotequote all
I am going after work, last free day before i travel down south for my wedding, so having some fun.

Mate says its fine, as good as man of steel, which is all i wanted smile

dom9

8,079 posts

209 months

Monday 28th March 2016
quotequote all
We're off to our local Everyman cinema tonight - I didn't mind MoS so i'll make my own mind up!

Still expecting to enjoy it, to be honest!

HTP99

22,558 posts

140 months

Monday 28th March 2016
quotequote all
Off to see it soon, MOS was good but nothing special, I love the Nolan Batman films but I'm not expecting this to be anything like them, I'm expecting more of a MOS style.

robemcdonald

8,797 posts

196 months

Monday 28th March 2016
quotequote all
Half in the bags spoiler filled review is here.

http://youtu.be/VGsrMaxx8N4

I have to say I think the guys call it right (they usually do)

SWoll

18,397 posts

258 months

Monday 28th March 2016
quotequote all
Halb said:
Arklight said:
Mark Kermodes review (Contains spoilers)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r1kyzE2We_8
He's one of the few critics out there that I think has any merit whatsoever.
Indeed, although he still waxes lyrical about how good a film Prometheus is...

Halb

53,012 posts

183 months

Monday 28th March 2016
quotequote all
SWoll said:
Halb said:
Arklight said:
Mark Kermodes review (Contains spoilers)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r1kyzE2We_8
He's one of the few critics out there that I think has any merit whatsoever.
Indeed, although he still waxes lyrical about how good a film Prometheus is...
rofl does he? Oh, Mark....

Rumblestripe

2,942 posts

162 months

Monday 28th March 2016
quotequote all
Halb said:
SWoll said:
Halb said:
Arklight said:
Mark Kermodes review (Contains spoilers)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r1kyzE2We_8
He's one of the few critics out there that I think has any merit whatsoever.
Indeed, although he still waxes lyrical about how good a film Prometheus is...
rofl does he? Oh, Mark....
Except he doesn't, most recently he has accepted that it is deeply flawed and he only ever said it was OK, never raved about it that I recall (and I'm a regular disciple of "the Church of Wittertainment")

dom9

8,079 posts

209 months

Tuesday 29th March 2016
quotequote all
Ok, so, I enjoyed that.

To be clear; I like action movies and that had a heap of action.

Gal Gadot is also an extremely attractive young lady.

This film wasn't a patch on the Nolan trilogy, for me. I also didn't like Batfleck. That's not to say he did a bad job but he just wasn't what I wanted/ expected.

However, I do understand that the Batman of the Dark Knight Returns comic is very 'different' to the Bale portrayal. I just didn't 'feel it'.

There were, however, a number of things that I really, really disliked...

1 - The music changing to a sort of campy 'tribal' music when Wonder Woman turned up - silly.
2 - The fight ending because of their Mums and the title protagonists then being best mates - No progression etc.
3 - Lex Luthor has all this information on Metahumas, Superman's Mum etc How? Why hadn't he used it before etc?
4 - The armoured suit when it was damaged during the fight. Looked like damaged Robocop. But Batman's face was fine - weak.
5 - Everyone is talking about the brutality of Afleck's fighting. I thought it was 'slower' and not as well choreographed as the Nolan films.
6 - Lex seemed to turn Superman against Batman very easily. We all like our Mums but I'm sure he could have put some effort into finding her!?


All in all though, I'll watch it again, at home, on the sofa...

Edited by dom9 on Tuesday 29th March 09:04

HTP99

22,558 posts

140 months

Tuesday 29th March 2016
quotequote all
Well after a bit of a slow and confused start, I thoroughly enjoyed the film.

I'm still not sure what was going on in parts of the film as it flitted about a bit too much and the dream sequences where annoying so it all got a bit confusing in places.

Jessie Eisenburg's casting as Lex Luthor was atrocious, he was terrible as was his portrayal as Luthor, I just found him annoying and his whole character was too trendy, a bit like you would imagine a Google executive to be, I didn't find him particularly menacing or scary, just bloody annoying.

Affleck was great as Batman; very well cast.

Wonder Woman, my god she was sexy and she can kick ass, the final fight was fantastic.

a Solid 7/10 for me.

Fastchas

2,646 posts

121 months

Tuesday 29th March 2016
quotequote all
Worse film in a long time for me. Took my two boys (11 & 6 yo's) to it last night. I was fed up an hour into it, totally lost by any plot that was hiding within it and fumed at paying £26 for the (dis)pleasure.
It's the only film ever I could have walked out on, and I've sat throught some crapiness.

Truckosaurus

11,299 posts

284 months

Tuesday 29th March 2016
quotequote all
HTP99 said:
...a bit like you would imagine a Google executive to be...
I think that's what they were going for, making him more of a 'dot com billionaire' rather than a traditionally ruthless businessman.

Quickmoose

4,494 posts

123 months

Tuesday 29th March 2016
quotequote all
Fastchas said:
Worse film in a long time for me. Took my two boys (11 & 6 yo's) to it last night. I was fed up an hour into it, totally lost by any plot that was hiding within it and fumed at paying £26 for the (dis)pleasure.
It's the only film ever I could have walked out on, and I've sat throught some crapiness.
So if you couldn't find a plot to enjoy, I imagine your two boys were bored to tears, or did they just lap up the fantasy violence?

6....?....just me?.... seems a smidge young but that's your look out I guess...just saying...

I seem to be in the minority of absolutely loving MoS and BvS.
Neither were as 'fantastic', glossy, bright, colourful or glib as Marvel's stuff, but I quite like the dark, sinister, serious tone that DC are taking.
Yes they crow-bar'd a shed load into this, didn't stop me enjoying it and leaves me wanting more.
I'd argue these are much more 'adult' than the Marvel films too...IMO anyway

Sir Snaz

571 posts

186 months

Tuesday 29th March 2016
quotequote all
Went to see this on Saturday on my own (she has had enough of supers) ....disjointed, muddled and vacuous ....I'm not a comic book aficionado by any means, but have a rough grasp of the various 'universes' ....and this just seemed to be thrown together ....and the weaving ( I say weaving, more like vomiting) in of other supers really irked me .....

I left after about an hour and a 15.....

Guvernator

13,157 posts

165 months

Tuesday 29th March 2016
quotequote all
Wow finding the vitriol aimed against this quite surprising. OK it has some issues but it's above average for me, certainly not bad enough to walk out on. Ok it's not up their with Marvels top tier films like Guardians or the First Avengers movie but certainly better than a lot of their average output like Thor etc.

People also complaining that it's too serious. This is about an orphaned alien coming to terms with being a god symnbol and literally having the weight of the world on his shoulders, another orphan who is on a psychotic rampage to right the wrong done to his parents as a child. A villain who has suffered child abuse, it even has a scene with a suicide bomber. Light-hearted it ain't but it works for me as it's very different to the MCU which makes a nice change to all the bright colours and quips. I dare to say it but it's a more adult movie in line with some of the more serious work done in the comics.

I love what Marvel have done with the MCU but I'm also enjoying the direction DC are taking with this. MoS was OK with but this is better still all IMO of course.

lionelf

612 posts

100 months

Tuesday 29th March 2016
quotequote all
Guvernator said:
Wow finding the vitriol aimed against this quite surprising. OK it has some issues but it's above average for me, certainly not bad enough to walk out on. Ok it's not up their with Marvels top tier films like Guardians or the First Avengers movie but certainly better than a lot of their average output like Thor etc.

People also complaining that it's too serious. This is about an orphaned alien coming to terms with being a god symnbol and literally having the weight of the world on his shoulders, another orphan who is on a psychotic rampage to right the wrong done to his parents as a child. A villain who has suffered child abuse, it even has a scene with a suicide bomber. Light-hearted it ain't but it works for me as it's very different to the MCU which makes a nice change to all the bright colours and quips. I dare to say it but it's a more adult movie in line with some of the more serious work done in the comics.

I love what Marvel have done with the MCU but I'm also enjoying the direction DC are taking with this. MoS was OK with but this is better still all IMO of course.
Entirely agree with all of that.

Afleck was brilliant as Batman. Very menacing and nasty. And he's willing to (and does) kill. Can't wait to see him in a stand alone Batman film.

I suspect it's MCU fans who are mainly complaining.

Anyway, it's drawing record crowds/income http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-35909299


cirian75

4,260 posts

233 months

Tuesday 29th March 2016
quotequote all
So BatFleck is a good batman?

Fastchas

2,646 posts

121 months

Tuesday 29th March 2016
quotequote all
Quickmoose said:
Fastchas said:
Worse film in a long time for me. Took my two boys (11 & 6 yo's) to it last night. I was fed up an hour into it, totally lost by any plot that was hiding within it and fumed at paying £26 for the (dis)pleasure.
It's the only film ever I could have walked out on, and I've sat throught some crapiness.
So if you couldn't find a plot to enjoy, I imagine your two boys were bored to tears, or did they just lap up the fantasy violence?

6....?....just me?.... seems a smidge young but that's your look out I guess...just saying...

I seem to be in the minority of absolutely loving MoS and BvS.
Neither were as 'fantastic', glossy, bright, colourful or glib as Marvel's stuff, but I quite like the dark, sinister, serious tone that DC are taking.
Yes they crow-bar'd a shed load into this, didn't stop me enjoying it and leaves me wanting more.
I'd argue these are much more 'adult' than the Marvel films too...IMO anyway
Yeah I get what you're saying about the 6yo but it's a 12A guidance so I wasn't too bothered. He got a bit scared at the end with the giant thing but I was there for him to bury his head into!
But they both enjoyed it, lapped up the fantastical stuff as you say. And I'd lose parenting points if I took one without the other without a really good reason (I won't consider taking him to 15 guidance BTW).
The 6yo definitely didnt 'get' any plot and TBH I think the 11yo would struggle to relay it to me if I asked him!

Silverage

2,034 posts

130 months

Tuesday 29th March 2016
quotequote all
Took my lad (12) to see it yesterday. I think he understood more what was going on than I did, especially all the other characters shoe-horned in.

Anyway, some goon sat next to me had brought his son who couldn't have been any older than 4. I had to spend the whole 2.5 hours listening to the goon explain in a whisper what was going on and why in virtually every scene. I was hoping the kid would become bored or scared and want to leave, but they stuck it out for the whole lot. Bloody cinemas, and that was over £20 for the two of us as well.

Pickled

2,051 posts

143 months

Tuesday 29th March 2016
quotequote all
Truckosaurus said:
I think that's what they were going for, making him more of a 'dot com billionaire' rather than a traditionally ruthless businessman.
Plus the fact he is Lex Jnr in the film, so played the entitled rich kid quite well i thought.

Agree Affleck was a good Batman, and his portrayal of Wayne was (i think) less borish than Bale's