Humans CH4

Author
Discussion

deadslow

8,009 posts

224 months

Monday 15th June 2015
quotequote all
I genuinely never thought it was possible to make a programme slower than Poldark. I was wrong.

zoom star

519 posts

152 months

Monday 15th June 2015
quotequote all
deadslow said:
I genuinely never thought it was possible to make a programme slower than Poldark. I was wrong.
Correct, I think Midsomer Murders take that honour.

Guvernator

13,166 posts

166 months

Monday 15th June 2015
quotequote all
Not seen this yet but I do intend to watch it when time permits as I do enjoy the premise, however I will echo what Munter has said. What would be the point of making a robot behave like a human or as close to as possible? Humans are irrational, illogical and driven by base and primitive needs such as survival and the need to procreate. Why on earth would you want to make a machine that in any way mimics that unless you have a serious God complex?

Would you buy a toaster that had mood swings and only made toast when it felt like it? Alternatively if I wanted someone to tell me to naff off when I ask them if they could make me a sandwich at 2 in the morning, I wouldn't need a robot, I could just ask the missus. smile

In reality I just don't think we'd ever build something of this nature which had the ability to run amok without some serious safeguards in place, could you imagine the law-suits for a start.

In sci-fi literature, the idea of good robots\AI who behave and in fact go out of their way to help humanity, even saving them from themselves is quite prevalent so I'd like to see someone try this on the big or small screen. I just think the whole robot slaves turn on their creators thing is getting very clichéd but I guess this is an easy sell compared to the much more difficult concept of good AI.

ajprice

27,531 posts

197 months

Monday 15th June 2015
quotequote all
Guvernator said:
Would you buy a toaster that had mood swings and only made toast when it felt like it?
hehe

Terminator X

15,108 posts

205 months

Monday 15th June 2015
quotequote all
poing said:
Good cast. It has me intrigued as to what exactly it is that's different with these other synthetics, I'm guessing emotions and other such stuff.

Raises lots of moral questions regarding the idea of robot "slaves" and I guess that's part of the idea.
Wind forward 100 years and it will be robot rights as well as human rights! That's if they've not already killed us off by then of course shoot

TX.

Guvernator

13,166 posts

166 months

Monday 15th June 2015
quotequote all
ajprice said:
Guvernator said:
Would you buy a toaster that had mood swings and only made toast when it felt like it?
hehe
Forgot about the toaster in Red Dwarf. roflrofl

Funnily enough, Krtyen's behaviour is probably a more realistic example of what a real AI\Robot would end up like if\when we eventually get there. smile

stuartmmcfc

8,664 posts

193 months

Monday 15th June 2015
quotequote all
It was ok, I'll watch next week but it'll be touch and go whether I continue.
I felt mildly dissapointed with the pace of it.

croyde

22,973 posts

231 months

Monday 15th June 2015
quotequote all
The scene with William Hurt about to hammer his Synth was reminiscent of Pinocchio. Mr Hurt was even dressed like the boy puppets maker.

anonymous-user

55 months

Monday 15th June 2015
quotequote all
i love scifi but this was st, poor writing, poor story and tedious. a scifi by numbers, but the numbers are 30 years old.

chris watton

22,477 posts

261 months

Monday 15th June 2015
quotequote all
The Spruce goose said:
i love scifi but this was st, poor writing, poor story and tedious. a scifi by numbers, but the numbers are 30 years old.
Well over 40 years if we include The Stepford Wives...

968

11,965 posts

249 months

Monday 15th June 2015
quotequote all
The Spruce goose said:
i love scifi but this was st, poor writing, poor story and tedious. a scifi by numbers, but the numbers are 30 years old.
I'll feed that back to the scriptwriter, who is my friend. Thanks.

Defcon5

Original Poster:

6,186 posts

192 months

Monday 15th June 2015
quotequote all
I though it was brilliant, had me on the edge of my seat all the way through.

Can't wait for next week.

RosscoPCole

3,320 posts

175 months

Monday 15th June 2015
quotequote all
It just didn't work for me. Personally I think it should have been set ten years in the future. I know this would have doubled the budget, but it would make it more plausible. I like the idea of the plot but there was something that was not right.

Jasandjules

69,945 posts

230 months

Monday 15th June 2015
quotequote all
RosscoPCole said:
It just didn't work for me. Personally I think it should have been set ten years in the future. I know this would have doubled the budget, but it would make it more plausible. I like the idea of the plot but there was something that was not right.
Yes, I found it odd to see 2005, 2008 plated cars in the car park when they've just bought a synthetic human which is many years away from us now.

chris watton

22,477 posts

261 months

Monday 15th June 2015
quotequote all
I just got around to watching it. On the whole, I really enjoyed it and have now added it to my planner.

CaptainSlow

13,179 posts

213 months

Monday 15th June 2015
quotequote all
I found it a bit slow but will watch again next week. I was quite impressed by the robots they used though, very realistic..unless it was cgi.

bexVN

14,682 posts

212 months

Monday 15th June 2015
quotequote all
CaptainSlow said:
I found it a bit slow but will watch again next week. I was quite impressed by the robots they used though, very realistic..unless it was cgi.
No I don't think so. Saw the girl who plays Anita being interviewed and she said they had to practice howitzer move.

Beefmeister

16,482 posts

231 months

Tuesday 16th June 2015
quotequote all
Jasandjules said:
RosscoPCole said:
It just didn't work for me. Personally I think it should have been set ten years in the future. I know this would have doubled the budget, but it would make it more plausible. I like the idea of the plot but there was something that was not right.
Yes, I found it odd to see 2005, 2008 plated cars in the car park when they've just bought a synthetic human which is many years away from us now.
This is what I came here to post. They can make a fully synthetic human, indistinguishable from us and get there's a woman in a wheelchair, everyone driving current cars and using normal mobile phones. Suspension of disbelief and all that, but it grates a little.

croyde

22,973 posts

231 months

Tuesday 16th June 2015
quotequote all
In fact didn't one of the clever synthetics have the first ever Orange mobile. A Nokia from the early 90s.

Munter

31,319 posts

242 months

Tuesday 16th June 2015
quotequote all
croyde said:
In fact didn't one of the clever synthetics have the first ever Orange mobile. A Nokia from the early 90s.
Given they are not supposed to have a need for phones, it may have been difficult to get their hands on anything more modern....

...or the writer is going to explain that a smart phone is easily tracked so they use old ones. Which would totally ignore that all mobile phones can be tracked by which towers they are talking to. You just need to know what phone you are interested in.