Kevin McCloud's Escape to the Wild

Author
Discussion

pidsy

7,989 posts

157 months

Tuesday 30th June 2015
quotequote all
i'm pretty sure that the 54 plate disco in front of welsh guys car was the crew car.

in terms of them being totally off grid - i'm not convinced. anyone else notice that when they were skinning the reindeer - there was a web address on the front of the chalet that kevin was staying in.
couldn't quite make out the address but it had something about wilderness courses on it.

they are certainly not as off grid as was made out.but...

thats the one in the series that i would love to have a go at. i'd much prefer to be somewhere cold than somewhere hot.

pidsy

7,989 posts

157 months

Tuesday 30th June 2015
quotequote all

Pesty

42,655 posts

256 months

Tuesday 30th June 2015
quotequote all
pidsy said:
thats the one in the series that i would love to have a go at. i'd much prefer to be somewhere cold than somewhere hot.
Quite like the cabin in the woods idea. Just a bit further south. A place with four proper seasons. Wyoming somewhere like that.


Also there I can't remember if they mentioned need it but when I was in Norway they said all the game animals were 'owned' by the Inuit so in order to hunt you had to pay the Inuit fir a licence. You can't just walk into the woods with a rifle and take an elk.


Roo

11,503 posts

207 months

Tuesday 30th June 2015
quotequote all
I could live there.

With hot water, heating, electricity, a decent 4x4 and a shop a couple of miles away.

I also mentioned to the wife about where did all their money go.

Pesty

42,655 posts

256 months

Wednesday 1st July 2015
quotequote all
Roo said:
I could live there.

With hot water, heating, electricity, a decent 4x4 and a shop a couple of miles away.

I also mentioned to the wife about where did all their money go.
And cable internet. I'd be fine.

Funkycoldribena

7,379 posts

154 months

Wednesday 1st July 2015
quotequote all
What happens when they get old? Can't see it being much fun getting water when you're 70 something...

Smollet

10,574 posts

190 months

Wednesday 1st July 2015
quotequote all
Funkycoldribena said:
What happens when they get old? Can't see it being much fun getting water when you're 70 something...
At that age they make their own in house so to speak wink

DonkeyApple

55,292 posts

169 months

Wednesday 1st July 2015
quotequote all
Funkycoldribena said:
What happens when they get old? Can't see it being much fun getting water when you're 70 something...
They pick up the phone to the State and get free food, housing and money.

DonkeyApple

55,292 posts

169 months

Wednesday 1st July 2015
quotequote all
Pesty said:
Quite like the cabin in the woods idea. Just a bit further south. A place with four proper seasons. Wyoming somewhere like that.
And a wider choice of mammals to make sweet, sweat love to. biggrin

p1doc

3,120 posts

184 months

Thursday 2nd July 2015
quotequote all
3 day trip=£1400,why so much if living on £200 a month mmmm all sounds dodgey to me and as a fan of game of thrones i would always be looking out for white walkers lol
martin

Lucas Ayde

3,557 posts

168 months

Friday 3rd July 2015
quotequote all
p1doc said:
3 day trip=£1400,why so much if living on £200 a month mmmm all sounds dodgey to me and as a fan of game of thrones i would always be looking out for white walkers lol
martin
I think the reason why many of the situations featured on the show seem dodgy is that the producers of the programme basically try to misrepresent what the expats are doing. This is the second time they've failed to mention that the people featured in the show are actually running a tourist type business in their location.

Instead, they pretend that the people concerned decided to just head out into the great wild outdoors with no plans, 'to get away from it all' and live self-sufficiently off the land. Hence, the whole scenario as portrayed on camera looks dodgy as puck.

DonkeyApple

55,292 posts

169 months

Friday 3rd July 2015
quotequote all
Lucas Ayde said:
I think the reason why many of the situations featured on the show seem dodgy is that the producers of the programme basically try to misrepresent what the expats are doing. This is the second time they've failed to mention that the people featured in the show are actually running a tourist type business in their location.

Instead, they pretend that the people concerned decided to just head out into the great wild outdoors with no plans, 'to get away from it all' and live self-sufficiently off the land. Hence, the whole scenario as portrayed on camera looks dodgy as puck.
I wonder if it's also a breach of product placement rules to favour the commercial break vending?

Ie those buying normal ad slots have legal assurances re what else is advertised?