Westworld (NO SPOILERS)

Author
Discussion

lemmingjames

7,457 posts

204 months

Wednesday 19th October 2016
quotequote all
So the outlaw bandits - real people - the black muscular dude in episode 1 talking about heading out west with a robot guide?

FourWheelDrift

88,523 posts

284 months

Wednesday 19th October 2016
quotequote all
lemmingjames said:
So the outlaw bandits - real people - the black muscular dude in episode 1 talking about heading out west with a robot guide?
Teddy was shooting them and they weren't going down so I'd say yes.

ben5575

6,272 posts

221 months

Wednesday 19th October 2016
quotequote all
[redacted]

Flip Martian

19,680 posts

190 months

Wednesday 19th October 2016
quotequote all
[redacted]

Flip Martian

19,680 posts

190 months

Wednesday 19th October 2016
quotequote all
Guvernator said:
Agreed. I'd have prefered a slightly slower build up. They could have developed the story, shown people having a good time in the park without any mishaps and built up some of the background of the characters for a few weeks before starting to show the darker side and the hosts becoming aware. I suppose though that they have to draw the punters in or risk the show getting cancelled. I really hope they do have something else in the bag though or else they've blown their load too soon.
Ep 1 was also the original pilot. Just having a nice time with people on holiday would have been a sure fire way of not progressing to a series, I guess lol.

gregs656

10,886 posts

181 months

Wednesday 19th October 2016
quotequote all
[redacted]

Butter Face

30,308 posts

160 months

Wednesday 19th October 2016
quotequote all
I think the interesting point of part 3 was where Teddy was butchered by the masked guys and he was taking shots at them but not taking any of them down. Tampered with hosts? Guests?

They also laboured the point that only certain hosts can shoot guns with the scene with Delores practicing, then later she managed to shoot the bad guy (who is the voice actor from GTA 5 that does Trevor!) with no issues.


popeyewhite

19,876 posts

120 months

Wednesday 19th October 2016
quotequote all
ben5575 said:
Very true. Ironic that on the one hand you have Hopkins telling the scientists that they are robots and not to care about them, whilst on the other expecting the audience to empathise with them.
Sorry, who is expecting the audience to empathise with the robots? Not getting you there at all.

ben5575

6,272 posts

221 months

Wednesday 19th October 2016
quotequote all
popeyewhite said:
ben5575 said:
Very true. Ironic that on the one hand you have Hopkins telling the scientists that they are robots and not to care about them, whilst on the other expecting the audience to empathise with them.
Sorry, who is expecting the audience to empathise with the robots? Not getting you there at all.
The programme makers are. As stated above in order to engage with the story/tv programme, you and I the viewer should be able to empathise with the main characters be they human or robot*. At the moment, one of the main protagonists (Hopkins) is actively telling the humans not to care about the robots. On the other hand, one presumes that the programme makers are trying to convince us the viewer that we should care about the robots.

The problem with this at the moment, and as pointed out above, as soon as something horrendous happens to a robot, it's simply taken offline, fixed and rebooted the next day. There is simply no pathos at the moment.

It is very different from the excellent Ch4 'Humans' which has a similar emerging consciousness in robots storyline, and makes it work very well.

*I know their not 'robots' wink

Flip Martian

19,680 posts

190 months

Wednesday 19th October 2016
quotequote all
popeyewhite said:
ben5575 said:
Very true. Ironic that on the one hand you have Hopkins telling the scientists that they are robots and not to care about them, whilst on the other expecting the audience to empathise with them.
Sorry, who is expecting the audience to empathise with the robots? Not getting you there at all.
One of the interviews with the makers before broadcast indicated they were turning around the basic premise of the film - where you were meant to sympathise with the guests as they suffer at the hands of the robots - and empathise with the robots as they are used and abused, to the point where the humans are seen as the villains for how they created the robots to be basically used and killed repeatedly.

gregs656

10,886 posts

181 months

Wednesday 19th October 2016
quotequote all
They also portray guests differently depending on how they act with the hosts. There have been multiple conversations about how horrific the lives of some hosts are. There is no doubt that we are meant to empathise with Delores.

The show is going no where if we don't care about the characters.

Flip Martian

19,680 posts

190 months

Wednesday 19th October 2016
quotequote all
gregs656 said:
They also portray guests differently depending on how they act with the hosts. There have been multiple conversations about how horrific the lives of some hosts are. There is no doubt that we are meant to empathise with Delores.

The show is going no where if we don't care about the characters.
Yeah but you're assuming that because you don't (and a couple of others commenting), no-one else does. I'm fascinated seeing how Dolores develops and I don't think its the last we've seen of the original Peter Abernathy either - I thought he was the best part of ep 1.

hungry_hog

2,238 posts

188 months

Wednesday 19th October 2016
quotequote all
Great series so far.

Lovely touch with Black Hole Sun in the first episode. That song on piano really suits a Western!

In the original film there are some scenes in Medievalworld and (less so) Romanworld. Do people think they will do the same in the tv series?

popeyewhite

19,876 posts

120 months

Wednesday 19th October 2016
quotequote all
Flip Martian said:
popeyewhite said:
ben5575 said:
Very true. Ironic that on the one hand you have Hopkins telling the scientists that they are robots and not to care about them, whilst on the other expecting the audience to empathise with them.
Sorry, who is expecting the audience to empathise with the robots? Not getting you there at all.
One of the interviews with the makers before broadcast indicated they were turning around the basic premise of the film - where you were meant to sympathise with the guests as they suffer at the hands of the robots - and empathise with the robots as they are used and abused, to the point where the humans are seen as the villains for how they created the robots to be basically used and killed repeatedly.
Ah, thanks. Sort of a Legend - where you're supposed to switch sympathy and feel sorry for the zombies - type thing.

walm

10,609 posts

202 months

Thursday 20th October 2016
quotequote all
gregs656 said:
They also portray guests differently depending on how they act with the hosts. There have been multiple conversations about how horrific the lives of some hosts are. There is no doubt that we are meant to empathise with Delores.

The show is going no where if we don't care about the characters.
This is key.
And actually why Hopkins's about-face was so annoying.
Ep 1 & 2 he seemed to be behaving exactly how "Arnold" was described. i.e. he loves them, hangs out with them and treats them well.
Then he takes a scalpel to the face... odd.

So far it seems to me that the question the viewer is being asked is - the ONLY thing that stops the hosts being conscious/human/morally relevant is the fact that the ops team wipe their memory every night...
so are they really more human than we originally think?

As more and more memories are allowed to reside (unclear if that is Hopkins's virus or just Bernand mucking around) we as viewer must be lead towards a "they're conscious" conclusion, no?

I for one would like to be the first to welcome our new Wild West overlords.

Oh and even money on:
Bernand's lover/admin lady - cyborg.
Bernand's son - cyborg.
Bernand's wife - cyborg (shout out to Gina Torres - she must have a bigger role going forward).

Finally WTF with the whole reset overnight thing.
Dolores and Teddy seem to be reset every day.
Yet Teddy is out all night stalking Wyatt with the guest.
At what point do they call "time" and hose them all down, wipe their memories and put them to bed????

Lastly, for the Stray - what is the proximity requirement for sleep mode?
Oh and WTF with cutting his head off?? Just tell him to walk home!

Flip Martian

19,680 posts

190 months

Thursday 20th October 2016
quotequote all
walm said:
Finally WTF with the whole reset overnight thing.
Dolores and Teddy seem to be reset every day.
Yet Teddy is out all night stalking Wyatt with the guest.
At what point do they call "time" and hose them all down, wipe their memories and put them to bed????

Lastly, for the Stray...WTF with cutting his head off?? Just tell him to walk home!
These 2 things do puzzle me. I assumed until Ep 3 that every night it all goes into sleep mode once the guests are tucked up in bed (and assumed there were rules about things being shut down after a certain time for maintenance, rather than it being 24 hours).

The head off thing seemed a bit gratuitous. And in the pilot, a quick word in their ear would shut them down, so why can the girl only put the thing in sleep mode with a remote pad? And why not send it off to sleep with the words, when the pad doesn't work?

hedgefinder

3,418 posts

170 months

Thursday 20th October 2016
quotequote all
Flip Martian said:
These 2 things do puzzle me. I assumed until Ep 3 that every night it all goes into sleep mode once the guests are tucked up in bed (and assumed there were rules about things being shut down after a certain time for maintenance, rather than it being 24 hours).

The head off thing seemed a bit gratuitous. And in the pilot, a quick word in their ear would shut them down, so why can the girl only put the thing in sleep mode with a remote pad? And why not send it off to sleep with the words, when the pad doesn't work?
yes, it all got a little "Prometheus" unfortunately.

Halb

53,012 posts

183 months

Thursday 20th October 2016
quotequote all
Good theory Ben


I looked at my phone a few times...this was when the same characters were on...can't recall who. Bit I am interested in the good guy host and the good guy guest, very much less so the PH guest.

The face on Hopkins!! Nice...but also creepy.

And his change of opinion on the machines...a double bluff? Or hints to Arnold?

Cybertronian, brilliant!!


The gun thing, the velocity thing works, if the velocity is much reduced, it's like an airsoft impact.

I enjoyed the chat on human intelligence, and the brain. I also enjoyed how the woodchopper guy had been whittling constellations into his stty animals. And that self harm bit, genuinely creepy.

I'd say Westworld so far has beene a mix of;
Truman show
Jurassic Park
Humans
BSG
Dark City and Game of Thrones.

Interesting that this new horrible gang may be human.

FourWheelDrift

88,523 posts

284 months

Thursday 20th October 2016
quotequote all
walm said:
Finally WTF with the whole reset overnight thing.
Dolores and Teddy seem to be reset every day.
Yet Teddy is out all night stalking Wyatt with the guest.
At what point do they call "time" and hose them all down, wipe their memories and put them to bed????
Teddy has only just started the Wyatt addon that night so may not be back early the next day this time.

Maybe they have more than one Delores and Teddy. Delores might be remembering something that the other Delores experienced through shared networked AI.

Guvernator

13,156 posts

165 months

Thursday 20th October 2016
quotequote all
The human gang thing is a bit odd, so the indications are that they are guests as Ted's gun was ineffective against them? So there a a bunch of guests who decided to go all native? When did this happen and how long have they been there? Why are they following the mad Wyatt? I take it Hopkins character introduced this new story-line as no one else seems to know anything about it and mentioned wanting to give Ted some proper backstory which involves Wyatt.

Intrigued to see where this will lead but at the moment it seems a little off. The other female guest with Ted seemed genuinely scared, not really a nice experience for someone whose paid a lot of money to be there, I'd be wanting my money back. At what point are the actions of other guests deemed unacceptable and the park keepers have to step in and call time?