Good horror movies..

Author
Discussion

chris watton

22,477 posts

261 months

Sunday 9th August 2015
quotequote all
blindswelledrat said:
remkingston said:
Did you watch it on a small screen with headphones? I don't want to come across as condescending but it's quite a smart film in the way it uses subtle background queues rather than being more obvious than a typical jump scare film. I don't know whether it was placebo or not but I'm pretty sure it was using infrasound also - a bit like the beginning of Irreversible - which would be lost on smaller speakers / headphones adding to the tone, tension and build up.

However, because it relies a lot on tension, if it doesn't grab you then it has nothing to build on.

Each to their own and all though squire!
Agreed.
At face value it is a terrible film based on a terrible premise.
But for me it was so well done and brilliantly created this constant build up of relentless dread using subtle tactics that it worked perfectly.

The thing about subtle horror films (which for me are definitely the best ones) like Blair Witch, Paranormal Activity etc.. if you don't feel the tension and buy into it, then what you are left with is actually nothing at all. I can completely understand why people think those two films are terrible despite them being two of my favourites.
For me, It Follows is one of the best horrors I have watched in a long time, this was complemented by the excellent (and very unnerving) soundtrack. Subtle yet very effective, and made of a relative shoestring, AFAIK.



smithyithy

7,259 posts

119 months

Monday 10th August 2015
quotequote all
chris watton said:
For me, It Follows is one of the best horrors I have watched in a long time, this was complemented by the excellent (and very unnerving) soundtrack. Subtle yet very effective, and made of a relative shoestring, AFAIK.

Completely agree. I watched it Saturday night and was very surprised by it, very different to the recent crop of (non)horror films. Well shot, great soundtrack, very creepy. Impressive!

downstairs

3,558 posts

218 months

Wednesday 26th August 2015
quotequote all
You could do an awful lot worse than watch V/H/S/2 on Film4 tonight, as part of their FrightFest season. It's excellent. Although if blindswelledrat sees this he will deny that and say it's rubbish, so don't listen to him!

smithyithy

7,259 posts

119 months

Wednesday 26th August 2015
quotequote all
I quite liked VHS, predictable but relatively enjoyable.

Grave Encounters 1/2 are worth a punt. Anyone seen ABC's of death? It's on Netflix but I haven't caught it yet.

I watched a film on the weekend called Coherance:

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2866360/?ref_=nv_sr_1

More of a Sci-Fi than horror but it was pretty good, quite clever and eerie / tense at parts, worth a watch.

blindswelledrat

25,257 posts

233 months

Wednesday 26th August 2015
quotequote all
downstairs said:
You could do an awful lot worse than watch V/H/S/2 on Film4 tonight, as part of their FrightFest season. It's excellent. Although if blindswelledrat sees this he will deny that and say it's rubbish, so don't listen to him!
You keep changing your name so I never know who you are!!!!

I would love other people to watch this and arbitrate our difference of opinion on this one.

downstairs

3,558 posts

218 months

Wednesday 26th August 2015
quotequote all
smithyithy said:
Anyone seen ABC's of death?
Coincidentally I watched up to S of ABCs 2 last night. The first one is more interesting as an exercise than it is actually any good. Two or three stories stick in my mind which are worthwhile - X for XXL, L for Libido, D for Dogfight. U for Unearthed is alright as well.

So fat it feels like the hit rate of the second one is less, although there have again been a handful of half-decent stories so far. Overall, I wouldn't recommend either of them especially - but if you can find some of the better segments on YouTube or w'ev, they're worth a look.

smithyithy

7,259 posts

119 months

Wednesday 26th August 2015
quotequote all
I may do that then, save watching the whole films.

The TV lineup on Film4 looks good, most of them I've seen already though, but it's ncie to go back and rewatch them. Original and remake of Evil Dead, the original Texas Chainsaw (one of my favourites)..

Goatboy

291 posts

235 months

Wednesday 26th August 2015
quotequote all
The Thing
American Werewolf in London
The Howling
Salems Lot (technically a mini series. James Mason on top creepy form)
Demons
Day of the Dead (original)
Scanners
Re-Animator
Demons 1 and 2
Phantasm
Poltergeist
Brain Dead
Fright Night
Evil Dead 1-3
Then pretty much everything from Hammer

Yes I know it's a bit 80's apart from Hammer but it was my peak horror watching days.

downstairs

3,558 posts

218 months

Wednesday 26th August 2015
quotequote all
blindswelledrat said:
You keep changing your name so I never know who you are!!!!
I've been downstairs for just ages.

Aphex

2,160 posts

201 months

Wednesday 26th August 2015
quotequote all
Nobody seen Goodnight Mommy yet?

Decent horror, follows alongside Babadook and some of It Follows. Very glad these films are making a turn to the more subtle.

7/10

downstairs

3,558 posts

218 months

Wednesday 26th August 2015
quotequote all
Has anyone seen Starry Eyes, Spring or Harbinger Down? I really fancy all three but don't get time to watch as much as I'd like.

Aphex

2,160 posts

201 months

Wednesday 26th August 2015
quotequote all
I've seen Harbinger Down.

I wanted to love this as they're behind some of the greatest effects put to film but it does come across a bit cheap.

I'd probably say 6/10 and that might be a little generous

chris watton

22,477 posts

261 months

Wednesday 26th August 2015
quotequote all
Hmm, not sure about 1985's Day of the Dead. I remember watching this at the cinema when it first came out, and having a sense of overwhelming disappointment, especially after watching Dawn of the Dead not long before. Yet, Day of the Dead now has cult status for some reason! The characters were all one dimensional, and the whole film seemed quite a few steps back from the 1979 classic. I know there were budget problems, but it was the crappy characterisation that ruined it for me.

Having said that, I do have the Blu Ray and still enjoy watching it, but not nearly as often as Dawn of the Dead.

For me, I think Romero is slightly overrated, he made four great films, Night of the Living Dead, Martin, Dawn of the Dead and Creepshow. It was all downhill from there, IMOHO (I guess similar to John carpenter, great early work (with great soundtracks) in the late '70's/early '80's, and then a string of true stinkers...)

Edited by chris watton on Wednesday 26th August 13:03

mike579

14 posts

107 months

Wednesday 26th August 2015
quotequote all
Recently watched 'The Babadook' and found it rather entertaining, quite a bit better than any other horror films I've seen recently.

downstairs

3,558 posts

218 months

Wednesday 26th August 2015
quotequote all
Aphex said:
I've seen Harbinger Down.

I wanted to love this as they're behind some of the greatest effects put to film but it does come across a bit cheap.

I'd probably say 6/10 and that might be a little generous
Interesting, thanks. I'm hoping it's going to be as much fun as Deep Rising was (another film Harbinger reminds me of from trailers, which I loved to bits in the face of universal disdain).

chris watton said:
Hmm, not sure about 1985's Day of the Dead.
That's my favourite of the original trilogy by far. I think Night has its place but is an irrelevance today. Dawn is just silly. I don't rate Romero at all though really: he's a decent enough writer but a very dull director. I don't even like Martin very much.

soad

32,914 posts

177 months

Wednesday 26th August 2015
quotequote all
It appears that Wes Craven directed prawn films? hehe
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wes_Craven

Goatboy

291 posts

235 months

Wednesday 26th August 2015
quotequote all
chris watton said:
Hmm, not sure about 1985's Day of the Dead. I remember watching this at the cinema when it first came out, and having a sense of overwhelming disappointment, especially after watching Dawn of the Dead not long before. Yet, Day of the Dead now has cult status for some reason! The characters were all one dimensional, and the whole film seemed quite a few steps back from the 1979 classic. I know there were budget problems, but it was the crappy characterisation that ruined it for me.

Having said that, I do have the Blu Ray and still enjoy watching it, but not nearly as often as Dawn of the Dead.

For me, I think Romero is slightly overrated, he made four great films, Night of the Living Dead, Martin, Dawn of the Dead and Creepshow. It was all downhill from there, IMOHO (I guess similar to John carpenter, great early work (with great soundtracks) in the late '70's/early '80's, and then a string of true stinkers...)

Edited by chris watton on Wednesday 26th August 13:03
So we are clear. They Live is genius right? Or is that bad. Don't get me wrong Carpenter has been so prolific and made some awful films (Ghosts from Mars) but I do think he generally has made more good than bad. Also fair to say when he's good he's really good as well.

chris watton

22,477 posts

261 months

Wednesday 26th August 2015
quotequote all
Goatboy said:
So we are clear. They Live is genius right? Or is that bad. Don't get me wrong Carpenter has been so prolific and made some awful films (Ghosts from Mars) but I do think he generally has made more good than bad. Also fair to say when he's good he's really good as well.
You know, I had forgotten that one, and Prince of Darkness, and I have both in my DVD collection, staring at me! Doh!

Zod

35,295 posts

259 months

Wednesday 26th August 2015
quotequote all

chris watton

22,477 posts

261 months

Wednesday 26th August 2015
quotequote all
Zod said:
I have that on BR, too!