Fear the walking dead.

Author
Discussion

Lucas Ayde

3,557 posts

168 months

Friday 28th August 2015
quotequote all
SkySailing said:
A lot of them still don't though. I'm talking about lesser shows here, like Two and a Half men when it was running, South park, family guy etc. they' all come weeks/months after.

I imagine FTWD is a week behind because based on the first episode, it's not "hot property"
Whether you think the show is going to succeed or not (and despite having my reservations, I think it still has potential) there is no denying that it has been massively anticipated and heavily hyped.

No doubt BT paid a pretty penny to secure AMC channel and part of the allure was this show. Not to get it out within a day or so of the US showing is a screwup of massive proportions.

Lucas Ayde

3,557 posts

168 months

Friday 28th August 2015
quotequote all
London424 said:
Of course, but when you launch a show and you are wanting advertising revenue (or in the case of BT additional subscribers) it's probably a good idea to not leave yourself open to torrent downloaders.
But BT are ultimately trying to sell their high speed internet so it's win/win laugh

Halb

53,012 posts

183 months

Friday 28th August 2015
quotequote all
Lucas Ayde said:
No doubt BT paid a pretty penny to secure AMC channel and part of the allure was this show. Not to get it out within a day or so of the US showing is a screwup of massive proportions.
Yip.
Anyone that does this now with a premium US show is simply behind the times.

Spanna

3,732 posts

176 months

Monday 31st August 2015
quotequote all
This finally premieres in the UK tonight, so how does anyone without BT watch it exactly? I do have BT broadband, but the only info I can find says it's Freeview channel 59.

Can I stream it any where?
Should I just watch eps 1&2, ugh hum, elsewhere...?

Negative Creep

24,980 posts

227 months

Monday 31st August 2015
quotequote all
Having seen episode 2 I would say it is showing enough to keep me invested. There is still that overhanging feeling of dread and how you know it's all going to go horribly wrong very soon. That said, the riot scene lacked intensity and didn't feel very realistic. Encountering the zombie in the school wasn't as tense at it should have been either. Whilst it's clear the outbreak has begun I would have thought more people would know since everyone has a smartphone these days

Johnny

9,652 posts

284 months

Monday 31st August 2015
quotequote all
Just set series link for this for tonight so will give it a go...

Still need to catch up with last few seasons of WD.

croyde

22,898 posts

230 months

Monday 31st August 2015
quotequote all
Freeview 59 is the BT showcase channel. Ep1 will be free but then you'll have to be a BT customer in order to carry on watching it.

Ep1 is also free on AMC.COM. com but I have to say that it hasn't tempted me to buy into yet another TV package.

Really long, drawn out, with no sympathy for the main characters. Only the last 5 mins had any similarity with WD.

type-r

14,068 posts

213 months

Monday 31st August 2015
quotequote all
I have quite liked the slow burn of Ep 1 tonight - different from the regular WD series, which IMO is a good thing. Once you adjust to the pace, it's enjoyable.

5-Oh

206 posts

107 months

Monday 31st August 2015
quotequote all
Love the walking dead but I think I already have my fill of zombies. Might get hooked though, you never know.

Looking forward to Ash vs The Evil Dead

clonmult

10,529 posts

209 months

Tuesday 1st September 2015
quotequote all
5-Oh said:
Love the walking dead but I think I already have my fill of zombies. Might get hooked though, you never know.

Looking forward to Ash vs The Evil Dead
I'm t'other way round. Got vaguely interested in the Walking Dead, but it got quite unbelivably boring. Slow, didn't give a damn about the characters in the slightest. For me, the first episode of FTWD was way more entertaining than anything that appeared in TWD. Which probably means I'll still get bored of it ....

smithyithy

7,245 posts

118 months

Tuesday 1st September 2015
quotequote all
Bloody hell, Ep.2 was a slow one..

I thought to myself, perhaps I'm being naive in not remembering that everyone in this series knows nothing so far, unlike TWD where people know what the walkers are, and what has happened to the world.

But even still, I'm struggling to connect to the characters in this so far.

And one thing that annoys me (in shows in general, not just this) is how people never tell each other stuff! Like when they're on the phone to each other.. The dad could've told his ex that he needs to get their son because the virus is serious and people are being shot and killed as it's spreading, but she's just talking over him, and not listening.

Then the wife who doesn't mention she just killed a zombie, the husband doesn't explain that he's held up in a shop because there's a riot outside..

Communication, people! laugh


Still, the daughter is lovely cloud9

Bullett

10,886 posts

184 months

Tuesday 1st September 2015
quotequote all
I actually thought E2 was a bit better/faster moving but I got annoyed at the same things as you. I actually said the Mrs. why do they not just tell each other the truth rather than some emotional bull based metaphor

moanthebairns

17,939 posts

198 months

Wednesday 2nd September 2015
quotequote all
I downloaded episode one and fk me it was painful.

The last five minutes was good, the rest of it, dear God it was so slow.

Anytime and suspense was built up, quick adverts then the most out of place clam scene in the world.

What fk wit thinks of this. Lets go from high intense drama to nothing continually throughout the show.

It became so much more apparent with my download that didn't have the adverts in but you could tell it was an obvious advert break.

Aphex

2,160 posts

200 months

Wednesday 2nd September 2015
quotequote all
I absolutely love this.

Super slow but not in the way season 2 of the Walking Dead was. Little glimpses of whats happening, no answers etc.

Big thumbs up from me, love a serious zombie romp

jhfozzy

1,345 posts

190 months

Wednesday 2nd September 2015
quotequote all
Episode two was much, much better, it is still not up to the speed of The walking dead yet in my opinion, but it has promise.

a311

5,803 posts

177 months

Wednesday 2nd September 2015
quotequote all
Got talking about this with the BiL at the weekend, he seemed to be under the impression that it was just a one of series to accompany TWD. Given the format and how the first two episodes have unfolded this would have made IMO. However it appears this theory is shot to st as AMC have committed to 2 seasons. Season 2 will be 15 episodes Vs the 6 in season 1.

And A 30-minute special introducing a new second season character will be released online and aired in chapters during commercial breaks of The Walking Dead. The story will be about the outbreak's effect on an airplane flight

I like the idea of lots of stories that aren't necessarily linked. Have suspenseful episodes and save some £ for some bigger set pieces.

I want to see the military response and loss to huge hordes of zombies, I don't think we'll get that. If we follow this one family we've effectively got in the end is TWD with an earlier start point, don't think that will work TBH.

ETA

Episode 2 had poor figures apparently but only compared to the premier.


Edited by a311 on Wednesday 2nd September 15:55

clonmult

10,529 posts

209 months

Thursday 3rd September 2015
quotequote all
jhfozzy said:
Episode two was much, much better, it is still not up to the speed of The walking dead yet in my opinion, but it has promise.
I stopped watching the walking dead because it was painfully slow .... (honestly, it was quite mind numbingly tedious!)

jhfozzy

1,345 posts

190 months

Thursday 3rd September 2015
quotequote all
clonmult said:
jhfozzy said:
Episode two was much, much better, it is still not up to the speed of The walking dead yet in my opinion, but it has promise.
I stopped watching the walking dead because it was painfully slow .... (honestly, it was quite mind numbingly tedious!)
Yeah, I think quite a few people stopped watching because it was getting too deep and complicated.

chris watton

22,477 posts

260 months

Thursday 3rd September 2015
quotequote all
jhfozzy said:
clonmult said:
jhfozzy said:
Episode two was much, much better, it is still not up to the speed of The walking dead yet in my opinion, but it has promise.
I stopped watching the walking dead because it was painfully slow .... (honestly, it was quite mind numbingly tedious!)
Yeah, I think quite a few people stopped watching because it was getting too deep and complicated.
I 100% disagree! I understood the plot lines and arcs fine, the simple fact (from my POV) is that Season 2 was mind-numbingly boring and stupid! The words 'Deep' and 'Complicated' are not words I would associate with TWD, at all!

Love it on the whole, though, and I did enjoy the slow-burner Fear the Walking Dead first episode.

moanthebairns

17,939 posts

198 months

Thursday 3rd September 2015
quotequote all
The seconds better than the first but by God they drag their feet. And there all pretty stupid.