Films I watched this week
Discussion
GetCarter said:
droopsnoot said:
arfursleep said:
The Wolf of Wall Street
Interesting story and decent performances on the whole but I found the film making itself lacking somewhat. There were obvious over-dubs and some odd editing which looked liked Scorsese was hiding continuity errors but in some cases it made & compounded them. These flaws served to take me out of the movie and look at it rather than watch it.
meh.
I read the book first, and was hoping the film would be as good. I don't know why, I can't remember the last time a film was as good as the book, but it was just a bit of a let-down.Interesting story and decent performances on the whole but I found the film making itself lacking somewhat. There were obvious over-dubs and some odd editing which looked liked Scorsese was hiding continuity errors but in some cases it made & compounded them. These flaws served to take me out of the movie and look at it rather than watch it.
meh.
TheChampers said:
GetCarter said:
Never is a film as good as a good book. It's impossible.
Generally speaking I would agree, but can think of a few where my conclusion was otherwise. This could be a new thread "films better than the book".Harry Potter and The Order Of The Phoenix and Harry Potter and The Half Blood Prince.
The Shawshank Redemption
(Kill me) Fahrenheit 451
Betty Blue
Ten Things I Hate About You (ok, an Elizabethan play rather than a book).
I've not read the book, but a I have heard people say on numerous occasions that "Deliverance" was far better as a film.
Any film version of anything by Dickens.
Edited by CR6ZZ on Thursday 8th September 05:34
TheChampers said:
GetCarter said:
Never is a film as good as a good book. It's impossible.
Generally speaking I would agree, but can think of a few where my conclusion was otherwise. This could be a new thread "films better than the book".Harry Potter and The Order Of The Phoenix and Harry Potter and The Half Blood Prince.
The Shawshank Redemption
(Kill me) Fahrenheit 451
Betty Blue
Ten Things I Hate About You (ok, an Elizabethan play rather than a book).
I've not read the book, but a I have heard people say on numerous occasions that "Deliverance" was far better as a film.
Any film version of anything by Dickens.
Edited by CR6ZZ on Thursday 8th September 05:35
TCEvo said:
Black Mass
Life and crimes of Boston gangster Whitey Bulger, played by J Depp.
Components all there for a decent movie (subject, setting, period, cast, old US cars etc) but I found it boring.
Spot on. Quite how they made such a dull film out of an interesting story, with a decent cast is beyond me.Life and crimes of Boston gangster Whitey Bulger, played by J Depp.
Components all there for a decent movie (subject, setting, period, cast, old US cars etc) but I found it boring.
Watched 'Green Room' the other day. Entertaining and very gory. 7/10
TheChampers said:
Generally speaking I would agree, but can think of a few where my conclusion was otherwise. This could be a new thread "films better than the book".
Harry Potter and The Order Of The Phoenix and Harry Potter and The Half Blood Prince.
The Shawshank Redemption
(Kill me) Fahrenheit 451
Betty Blue
Ten Things I Hate About You (ok, an Elizabethan play rather than a book).
Any film version of anything by Dickens.
The Bourne Identity (made it through the book and vowed never to read another Ludlum novel)Harry Potter and The Order Of The Phoenix and Harry Potter and The Half Blood Prince.
The Shawshank Redemption
(Kill me) Fahrenheit 451
Betty Blue
Ten Things I Hate About You (ok, an Elizabethan play rather than a book).
Any film version of anything by Dickens.
Three Days of the Condor
The Shining
TheChampers said:
GetCarter said:
Never is a film as good as a good book. It's impossible.
Generally speaking I would agree, but can think of a few where my conclusion was otherwise. This could be a new thread "films better than the book".Harry Potter and The Order Of The Phoenix and Harry Potter and The Half Blood Prince.
The Shawshank Redemption
(Kill me) Fahrenheit 451
Betty Blue
Ten Things I Hate About You (ok, an Elizabethan play rather than a book).
Any film version of anything by Dickens.
I also love "Watchmen". To see the novel so perfectly realised on screen was a joy (and yeah, I am one of those who love that movie. In fact I haven't fully re-read the graphic novel since the movie came out)
GetCarter said:
droopsnoot said:
arfursleep said:
The Wolf of Wall Street
Interesting story and decent performances on the whole but I found the film making itself lacking somewhat. There were obvious over-dubs and some odd editing which looked liked Scorsese was hiding continuity errors but in some cases it made & compounded them. These flaws served to take me out of the movie and look at it rather than watch it.
meh.
I read the book first, and was hoping the film would be as good. I don't know why, I can't remember the last time a film was as good as the book, but it was just a bit of a let-down.Interesting story and decent performances on the whole but I found the film making itself lacking somewhat. There were obvious over-dubs and some odd editing which looked liked Scorsese was hiding continuity errors but in some cases it made & compounded them. These flaws served to take me out of the movie and look at it rather than watch it.
meh.
The film on the other hand was much more entertaining IMO, although Margot Robbie probably had quite a lot to do with that.
Edited by TCEvo on Thursday 8th September 10:29
I've already mentioned films that IMO are better than the books (Bourne Identity, Three Days of the Condor). Never tread either, but I believe Jaws and The Godfather are supposedly better on the screen than they are in print.
Equally as good - The Lord of the Rings is one of my favourite books, so much so I threw it in the bin to stop me from reading it yet again (I'll no doubt get around to it again, some time). I would say that the films are definitely on a par with the book(s), a few character niggles (Boromir, Denethor) and a couple of plot deviations (Aragorn's dead! No he's not!) aside.
Books better than the film? I'm not widely read, so I haven't read, for example, Bonfire of the Vanities, but then I've never seen the film either, which is supposedly a load of crap. In fact, I'm struggling to think of any book I've read where the filmed version has made me think 'why did they bother?'.
Equally as good - The Lord of the Rings is one of my favourite books, so much so I threw it in the bin to stop me from reading it yet again (I'll no doubt get around to it again, some time). I would say that the films are definitely on a par with the book(s), a few character niggles (Boromir, Denethor) and a couple of plot deviations (Aragorn's dead! No he's not!) aside.
Books better than the film? I'm not widely read, so I haven't read, for example, Bonfire of the Vanities, but then I've never seen the film either, which is supposedly a load of crap. In fact, I'm struggling to think of any book I've read where the filmed version has made me think 'why did they bother?'.
Halmyre said:
Books better than the film? I'm not widely read, so I haven't read, for example, Bonfire of the Vanities, but then I've never seen the film either, which is supposedly a load of crap. In fact, I'm struggling to think of any book I've read where the filmed version has made me think 'why did they bother?'.
I've read Bonfire (several times) which is a modern classic. The film is beyond dire.Few others off the top of my head-
The Kite Runner
Captain Corelli's Mandolin
Atonement
Jaws, I would agree with that, it is superior to the short story. Spielberg made two big smart changes.
Lord of the Rings is a joke, it's st compared to the books, unless one wants a no-brain MTV sparkly version. Peter Jackson did a real number on plot, character and common sense there, misunderstanding a lot.
Lord of the Rings is a joke, it's st compared to the books, unless one wants a no-brain MTV sparkly version. Peter Jackson did a real number on plot, character and common sense there, misunderstanding a lot.
The Visit
Not a fan of the hand held/lost footage style of scary film really...but I have liked M. Knight Shalayamananan's stuff on the whole, (Unbreakable being in my top 5) and the trailer set this up quite well.
2 kids go stay with grandparents for a week.... it doesn't go well.
Apart from another decent MKS 'reveal' this was dull as fk....
Quite well acted I guess...just not a lot going on... 4.6/10
Not a fan of the hand held/lost footage style of scary film really...but I have liked M. Knight Shalayamananan's stuff on the whole, (Unbreakable being in my top 5) and the trailer set this up quite well.
2 kids go stay with grandparents for a week.... it doesn't go well.
Apart from another decent MKS 'reveal' this was dull as fk....
Quite well acted I guess...just not a lot going on... 4.6/10
Gassing Station | TV, Film, Video Streaming & Radio | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff