If you watched new Top Gear was it any good, yes or no?

If you watched new Top Gear was it any good, yes or no?

Poll: If you watched new Top Gear was it any good, yes or no?

Total Members Polled: 1113

I really enjoyed it: 192
I was disappointed: 544
Bring back JC, Hamster and Captain Slow: 252
I didn't watch it: 145
It's got potential: 49
Author
Discussion

ZesPak

24,428 posts

196 months

Monday 20th June 2016
quotequote all
qube_TA said:
They need to bring back the news, let them argue about cars a bit.
yes

The news with the 3 often had me in stitches. I watch some on youtube from time to time and they're still great.
Running jokes like the Dacia Sandero were pretty fun as well.

anonymous-user

54 months

Monday 20th June 2016
quotequote all
Where's the 'Sack Evans' on the poll?

LDM

372 posts

127 months

Monday 20th June 2016
quotequote all
I do wonder if the BBC made a bit of a mistake with the schedule, this series I think started slightly later in the year and on top of that has clashed with other high viewer shows.

I for one was late switching over to it (although was recording) due to Canadian F1? and then there is obviously the football. One thing that has shocked me is the number of people who claim to be trying to ruin the viewing figures yet watching, is this really possible and if so doesn't it make them more than a little sad.

I usually watch the things I want and miss those I don't, is this not normal?

johnxjsc1985

15,948 posts

164 months

Monday 20th June 2016
quotequote all
The viewing figures are still falling because people like me who have watched TG since it was almost in Black and White will not entertain an hour of homage to Evans. more than happy to watch all the others but not him and not Jordan. This is not because of some perverted love for the Old TG it needed a shake up and you had to watch it because there were always moments even in the poorer shows that made you chuckle.
So if they want the ratings to go up get shut of the reason they are low and falling and FFS stop copying the old format we keep getting told it was stale so why copy it.

LDM

372 posts

127 months

Monday 20th June 2016
quotequote all
johnxjsc1985 said:
The viewing figures are still falling because people like me who have watched TG since it was almost in Black and White will not entertain an hour of homage to Evans. more than happy to watch all the others but not him and not Jordan. This is not because of some perverted love for the Old TG it needed a shake up and you had to watch it because there were always moments even in the poorer shows that made you chuckle.
So if they want the ratings to go up get shut of the reason they are low and falling and FFS stop copying the old format we keep getting told it was stale so why copy it.
I am a bit confused about the whinging about format, maybe a bit over simplified but to me the format has been pretty much the same since I started watching in the 70's, short pieces by various presenters set around cars, with different levels of nerdyness / humour depending on the time period / hosts. The main thing that had become tired if we are truly honest is the previous presenters enthusiasm. I wasn't really expecting anything too radical purely a freshness and hopefully a balance of the nerdy / humour which seems to be what they have gone for.

Totally agree it would have been nice if they had gone more into why they picked the cars they did for the challenge, but credit to them for doing something radical and resisting the traditional side splitting humour of crashing into each other!

Usget

5,426 posts

211 months

Monday 20th June 2016
quotequote all
hornet said:
Challenge was hit and miss, mostly because they never really explained why they were doing it.
Yes - absolutely agree with this (and the Reliants to Blackpool and the 4x4s and musicians nonsense are two more examples). The old show's challenges always made sense in some universe or another - these seem to have been picked by the Family Guy Manitees.

On another subject, Eddie Jordan needs to chuff off and take his spoons with him.

Bellini

768 posts

151 months

Monday 20th June 2016
quotequote all
I concur with many of the comments above.

RR's Tesla thing had some passion and reality to it, though I suspect he got carried away with the love until MLB tripped him up about the Jaguar. But that was good.

CH was thoroughly enjoyable.

MLB's Stig introduction was excellent.

The challenge had so much promise but really under delivered. I must have lost interest somewhere along the line because I have absolutely no clue how it ended.

Bear Grylls looked like he'd been sprayed with milky coffee, which was about the only noteworthy thing about that segment. And that's an improvement on the previous 3 alone, so it's hardly praise.

It's improving. Just.

esv683

109 posts

267 months

Monday 20th June 2016
quotequote all

stuarthat

1,049 posts

218 months

Monday 20th June 2016
quotequote all
Overal good pointless challenge .

stuarthat

1,049 posts

218 months

Monday 20th June 2016
quotequote all
Overal good pointless challenge .

944fan

4,962 posts

185 months

Monday 20th June 2016
quotequote all
Thought this week's was the weakest one yet. It just doesn't flow.

I don't get all the PH love for Chris Harris either, he has very little personality at all. Dull

Blib

44,064 posts

197 months

Monday 20th June 2016
quotequote all
LDM said:
Totally agree it would have been nice if they had gone more into why they picked the cars they did for the challenge, but credit to them for doing something radical and resisting the traditional side splitting humour of crashing into each other!
Radical? What on earth did they do that was "radical"?

MG CHRIS

9,083 posts

167 months

Monday 20th June 2016
quotequote all
944fan said:
Thought this week's was the weakest one yet. It just doesn't flow.

I don't get all the PH love for Chris Harris either, he has very little personality at all. Dull
Totally agree with you on that.

FredClogs

14,041 posts

161 months

Monday 20th June 2016
quotequote all
Some funny, well edited, expensively shot scenes of escapades by professional TV personalities in cars and expensively shot scenes of some guy driving an ridiculously expensive car around a deserted race track.

Some incredibly badly presented cringeworthy studio stuff where gooning morons watch some middle aged man read an auto cue and pour sycomphancy onto some b list celebrity...

It's Top Gear, same as it ever was, no better no worse, just the same. IT'S THE SAME!

Except for Eddie Jordan, whilst I'm always impressed by a man that can play the spoons, I'm not quite sure what Eddie Jordan is all about...

JoeMarano

1,042 posts

100 months

Tuesday 21st June 2016
quotequote all
Watching episode 4 and really enjoying it. Quite how they didn't get in trouble for allowing a chef with knives in his hands to be in the back seat of Sebines car with no seat belt on I do not know!

r11co

6,244 posts

230 months

Tuesday 21st June 2016
quotequote all
FredClogs said:
Some incredibly badly presented cringeworthy studio stuff where gooning morons watch some middle aged man read an auto cue and pour sycomphancy onto some b list celebrity...
Its the one thing Evans has brought to the table that has done nothing to improve the show - pandering to his sleb 'mates', but it was always going to be like that, wasn't it.

The CHM era never allowed the celebrity moments to take over from the car content (even when Tom Cruise was on), apart from the one time when Kristin Scott Thomas's appearance was more about her, or actually more about Clarkson's crush on her so still played for laughs.

cologne2792

2,126 posts

126 months

Tuesday 21st June 2016
quotequote all
Clarkson, Hammond and May talked TO the viewers.
Evans talks DOWN to them.

I think this is why he's so annoying.

r11co

6,244 posts

230 months

Tuesday 21st June 2016
quotequote all
cologne2792 said:
Clarkson, Hammond and May talked TO the viewers.
Evans talks DOWN to them.
He talks down to his co-presenters too, especially the new guys. His comment to Harris after the Vulcan film about it being 'probably the best track piece on Top Gear ever' didn't sound in the least bit patronising.

marcosgt

11,019 posts

176 months

Tuesday 21st June 2016
quotequote all
Raygun said:
Where's the 'Sack Evans' on the poll?
It's broken, apparently you can't have two options to "Sack Evans" biggrin

r11co said:
Its the one thing Evans has brought to the table that has done nothing to improve the show - pandering to his sleb 'mates', but it was always going to be like that, wasn't it.
That reads as though you meant he's brought other things 'to the table' that HAVE improved the show.

Or did you mean "It's the one thing Evans has brought to the table, but it has done nothing to improve the show"?

M.

Edited by marcosgt on Tuesday 21st June 08:16

MarshPhantom

9,658 posts

137 months

Tuesday 21st June 2016
quotequote all
FredClogs said:
Some funny, well edited, expensively shot scenes of escapades by professional TV personalities in cars and expensively shot scenes of some guy driving an ridiculously expensive car around a deserted race track.

Some incredibly badly presented cringeworthy studio stuff where gooning morons watch some middle aged man read an auto cue and pour sycomphancy onto some b list celebrity...

It's Top Gear, same as it ever was, no better no worse, just the same. IT'S THE SAME!

Except for Eddie Jordan, whilst I'm always impressed by a man that can play the spoons, I'm not quite sure what Eddie Jordan is all about...
My SIL organised a round the world yacht tour recently and Jordan was one of the participants in his boat. Compared with some of other owners he was apparently a really nice bloke.