If you watched new Top Gear was it any good, yes or no?

If you watched new Top Gear was it any good, yes or no?

Poll: If you watched new Top Gear was it any good, yes or no?

Total Members Polled: 1113

I really enjoyed it: 192
I was disappointed: 544
Bring back JC, Hamster and Captain Slow: 252
I didn't watch it: 145
It's got potential: 49
Author
Discussion

ZesPak

24,430 posts

196 months

Tuesday 5th July 2016
quotequote all
Love that NSX! Did he say under 3 to 60?

98elise

26,606 posts

161 months

Tuesday 5th July 2016
quotequote all
cologne2792 said:
V8A*ndy said:
cologne2792 said:
Production values and attention to detail are not as good as old Top Gear resulting in something that doesn't feel as polished and as joined up somehow.
I have found the production side of things to be currently some of the best in the industry. There has been some fantastically shot scenes. The Aston and Tesla scenes I thought were right up there,if not the best I've ever seen.

I come from a sound production background and I've noticed that hasn't been ignored either. Again excellent.

However, I find the over use of animated graphics, highlights and buzzy sound effects (as in the NSX video) to be incredibly annoying.

Overall I have enjoyed Top gear immensely , certainly a flawed gem but it always IMO was.

Lets not mention the M2 review though, absolutely dire.
I'm looking at it from the cinematic flavour that Andy Wilman was so good at visualizing.

Cars that have supposed to have been driven to a location and be mid-challenge / mid-review are seen to have condensation coming out of the exhaust suggesting lack of continuity foresight - camera mounts visible in the car suggesting very few takes and that it was done hastily and on the cheap - crew and equipment reflections visible in paint - not the end of the World but something that Wilman would never have allowed to reach the final cut and the difference between an ok production and an outstanding one.
The weird thing is they had a bigger budget, less shows and no special. The cinematography is the one thing that shouldn't have suffered at all.

944fan

4,962 posts

185 months

Tuesday 5th July 2016
quotequote all
Didn't think the last show was that good.

MLB in the Porsche was the best bit.

Don't like Rory Reid and still not sold on Harris, there is nothing wrong with him he is just quite dull. Sabine can go as well, she is awful. She may be able to drive a car well but she cannot do the rest.

I am glad CE has gone. CREXIT. He was the weakest link by far and whereas everyone else had improved from day 1 he hadn't changed at all.

V8RX7

26,870 posts

263 months

Tuesday 5th July 2016
quotequote all
944fan said:
Didn't think the last show was that good.

Don't like Rory Reid and still not sold on Harris, there is nothing wrong with him he is just quite dull. Sabine can go as well, she is awful. She may be able to drive a car well but she cannot do the rest.
Shows do take time to develop though - take a look at some of the old TopGear online and see the lack of fluidity between the three at the start.


johnxjsc1985

15,948 posts

164 months

Tuesday 5th July 2016
quotequote all
V8RX7 said:
Shows do take time to develop though - take a look at some of the old TopGear online and see the lack of fluidity between the three at the start.
but they where starting from scratch this show had the blueprint handed to them on a plate and they messed it up.

V8A*ndy

3,695 posts

191 months

Wednesday 6th July 2016
quotequote all
johnxjsc1985 said:
V8RX7 said:
Shows do take time to develop though - take a look at some of the old TopGear online and see the lack of fluidity between the three at the start.
but they where starting from scratch this show had the blueprint handed to them on a plate and they messed it up.
Big shoes to step into, dammed if you do and all that.

I was really starting to enjoy it warts and all.