Mr Bates vs The Post Office

Author
Discussion

siremoon

198 posts

100 months

Tuesday 2nd January
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
HAL 9000 springs to mind
I don't see why. HAL was programmed specifically to undertake and protect a mission that only it knew about and it did precisely that. By contrast the Post Office system was not deliberately designed and programmed to make accounting errors. It did so because of errors in its code. Now that happens all the time in complex software systems but what created this situation was the refusal of the Post Office or the system supplier to admit it.

tamore

Original Poster:

7,005 posts

285 months

Tuesday 2nd January
quotequote all
Alickadoo said:
What I am suggesting is that we keep a sense of proportion.

The Post Office is not totally corrupt. It may have been partially corrupt.

The country is not ruined.

I am suggesting that we avoid exaggerated language.

Calm down, dear.
i agree. however, as a country we need to be better at going after people with money/influence when appropriate.

TGCOTF-dewey

5,208 posts

56 months

Tuesday 2nd January
quotequote all
It's certainly deserving of a Haddon-Cave-eque inquiry as per the Nimrod disaster.

Where corporate greed leads to the deaths of individuals, those responsible do need holding to account.

Randy Winkman

16,208 posts

190 months

Tuesday 2nd January
quotequote all
GreengiantPH said:
Watched the first episode, very good, need to binge watch the rest tomorrow.

Observation because I recognised them, Fenny Compton village hall is actually Pratts Bottom Village hall in North Kent. Recognised it because they hold a model railway exhibition there every year and I have exhibited layouts there many times. I used to belong to the railway club in the village.
Lee the post master, which I think they said his post office was in Birmingham, is actually in St Mary Cray, just behind the Mary Rose pub, just a few miles down the road from Pratts Bottom.
[nerdy observation off]
Thanks. I know Pratts Bottom and didnt even realise. I'll be driving past it (the hall) tomorrow on my way to the garden centre for coffee and cake. coffee

The acting was indeed great. The older guy that came back from prison and met the other postmaster was as convincing as anyone I've ever seen on TV/film. I genuinely wondered if it was actually him.

I've only watched one episode so far and it is verging on making me miserable. But I guess it is always best to learn about real life.

heebeegeetee

28,789 posts

249 months

Tuesday 2nd January
quotequote all
Alickadoo said:
What I am suggesting is that we keep a sense of proportion.

The Post Office is not totally corrupt. It may have been partially corrupt.

The country is not ruined.

I am suggesting that we avoid exaggerated language.

Calm down, dear.
He didn't say the country is ruined, you're greatly exaggerating.

However this case is a metaphor for how the country is doing. There's been many great concerns over British justice over the years and this case shows the concerns are still perfectly valid. If Vennels, and managers and engineers from Fujitsu aren't put in court having committed perjury then the concerns are as valid today as ever.

It's not just this case of course, the health service, our water supplies, our inability to efficiently build a railway, public services and transport, the concerns go on and on.

What a terrible past decade or so this has been.

Seasonal Hero

7,954 posts

53 months

Tuesday 2nd January
quotequote all
This case makes me beyond angry. People went to prison but they were the wrong ones.

Anyone who follows this as the enquiry goes on, like I do, will just get angrier as the PO continues to obfuscate and deny justice.

Rushjob

1,859 posts

259 months

Tuesday 2nd January
quotequote all
Mrs RJ applied for a job with one of our local sub Post Offices in mid 2008, part of a group of extremely well known shops with SPO's in store.

During the interview it was mentioned that if at the end of the day her cash etc was not balanced, she would be personally responsible for making up the shortfall.

Came home and spoke to me about it, saying with that in mind she wouldn't accept the job if offered.

Next day she gets a call saying she's got the job and apparently the manager was really surprised when she turned it down and told them why.

Dodged a bullet there maybe?

Edited by Rushjob on Tuesday 2nd January 08:55

Alickadoo

1,733 posts

24 months

Tuesday 2nd January
quotequote all
heebeegeetee said:
He didn't say the country is ruined, you're greatly exaggerating.
What he actually said was:-

"What a fked up country we live in."

What does that mean, if not ruined?

Sheepshanks

32,821 posts

120 months

Tuesday 2nd January
quotequote all
Bonefish Blues said:
I bet someone turned up in a boardroom and proudly announced that the new system had uncovered widespread hitherto undetected fraud.
Was there significant (enough that these cases didn't make that much difference) fraud anyway?

It beggars belief that they could have gone from years of next to nothing to 15yrs of a case per week.

Nurburgsingh

5,123 posts

239 months

Tuesday 2nd January
quotequote all
Rushjob said:
Dodged a bullet there maybe?

Edited by Rushjob on Tuesday 2nd January 08:55
Indeed, our office was one of the ones that was closed down in the early phases of reducing the network, I look back now and count my lucky stars.




Edited by Nurburgsingh on Tuesday 2nd January 11:31

Seasonal Hero

7,954 posts

53 months

Tuesday 2nd January
quotequote all
Alickadoo said:
What he actually said was:-

"What a fked up country we live in."

What does that mean, if not ruined?
It means that it's fked up. Move on. No-one cares about your semantic debate.

Rh14n

944 posts

109 months

Tuesday 2nd January
quotequote all
Randy Winkman said:
Thanks. I know Pratts Bottom and didnt even realise. I'll be driving past it (the hall) tomorrow on my way to the garden centre for coffee and cake. coffee

The acting was indeed great. The older guy that came back from prison and met the other postmaster was as convincing as anyone I've ever seen on TV/film. I genuinely wondered if it was actually him.

I've only watched one episode so far and it is verging on making me miserable. But I guess it is always best to learn about real life.
Very good. A lot of it filmed beautifully in North Wales. As mentioned, some of our best actors as well. 'The older guy' is Ifan Huw Dafydd, one of Wales' finest actors (he played Nessa's father in 'Gavin and Stacey' if you're wondering where you've seen him before). The person depicted - Noel Thomas is very well known and respected in his native Anglesey and has just written a book about his experience 'The Stamp of Innocence'.

Edited by Rh14n on Tuesday 9th January 22:48

Muzzer79

10,064 posts

188 months

Tuesday 2nd January
quotequote all
Rushjob said:
Mrs RJ applied for a job with one of our local sub Post Offices in mid 2008, part of a group of extremely well known shops with SPO's in store.

During the interview it was mentioned that if at the end of the day her cash etc was not balanced, she would be personally responsible for making up the shortfall.

Came home and spoke to me about it, saying with that in mind she wouldn't accept the job if offered.

Next day she gets a call saying she's got the job and apparently the manager was really surprised when she turned it down and told them why.

Dodged a bullet there maybe?

Edited by Rushjob on Tuesday 2nd January 08:55
Bullet dodged indeed.

Whilst they are completely innocent in this scandal, I remain surprised at how many SPMs took on such a responsibility from the outset. I guess blind trust that it would be OK.

I thought the lady who played Jo was very good in the first episode. I think a lot of us know a local shop owner like that.

daqinggregg

1,542 posts

130 months

Tuesday 2nd January
quotequote all
I certainly don’t think this kind of endemic in the UK; I think the UK is no worse than many other countries and probably better than many.

Where this one differs, a highly respected institution introduces a system, that suddenly show wrong doing on a massive scale and nobody thought “Hang on a minute, something doesn’t look right” no logic was used, it was just “The computers says”, and that’s it.

Having been on the wrong end of “The computer says” is extremely frustrating. This is different, people went to prison on the strength of “The computer says”.

At the very least, all bonuses/golden handshakes paid in that period to senior management should be returned to the Post Office. Fujitsu should be barred from bidding for government contracts, for the immediate future.

Paula Vennells should be stripped of her CBE, as it was given in a large part for services to the Post Office.

Muzzer79

10,064 posts

188 months

Tuesday 2nd January
quotequote all
I was watching with the OH last night and commented how the victims of this must have a huge compensation claim at least ongoing.

But I've done some more research and learned that the Post Office paid out £57m in damages in 2019 (of which £46m was for legal fees) to 555 claimants and have basically said they don't have the money for any more. The Government have therefore had to step in to assist further claims.

Outrageous.

Mezzanine

9,229 posts

220 months

Tuesday 2nd January
quotequote all
Muzzer79 said:
I was watching with the OH last night and commented how the victims of this must have a huge compensation claim at least ongoing.

But I've done some more research and learned that the Post Office paid out £57m in damages in 2019 (of which £46m was for legal fees) to 555 claimants and have basically said they don't have the money for any more. The Government have therefore had to step in to assist further claims.

Outrageous.
Outrageous indeed.

And much like the tainted blood scandal (another similarly disgusting subject not covered any near as much as it should be) they have, and continue to, drag their heels in coming to a resolution whilst victims continue to age/die/get tired of fighting.

And obviously if the government are paying, that essentially means the taxpayers, not those who causes it.

Castrol for a knave

4,716 posts

92 months

Tuesday 2nd January
quotequote all
Mezzanine said:
Outrageous indeed.

And much like the tainted blood scandal (another similarly disgusting subject not covered any near as much as it should be) they have, and continue to, drag their heels in coming to a resolution whilst victims continue to age/die/get tired of fighting.

And obviously if the government are paying, that essentially means the taxpayers, not those who causes it.
Ah yes, the Tainted Blood debacle.

Where the government lost it's first whipped vote since 2019.

The Government voted against speeding up compensation payments, The usual head bangers obliged. When Andrea Jenkyns, breaking the whip and votes with Labour, then you truly are on the wrong side of the debate.

tamore

Original Poster:

7,005 posts

285 months

Tuesday 2nd January
quotequote all
i really hope there's a public groundswell of outrage about this. there are execs who need to be put in the dock.

that and general annoyance with what corporations are getting away with and not being held to account. thames water being a prime example.

Seasonal Hero

7,954 posts

53 months

Tuesday 2nd January
quotequote all
Paula Vennalls earned £5m whilst at the PO. Claw all of that back and give it to those affected, tax free. Same for every exec involved along with those at Fujitsu. And then sling the lot inside.

Bonefish Blues

26,862 posts

224 months

Tuesday 2nd January
quotequote all
Seasonal Hero said:
Paula Vennalls earned £5m whilst at the PO. Claw all of that back and give it to those affected, tax free. Same for every exec involved along with those at Fujitsu. And then sling the lot inside.
You mean make Execs personally liable for loss in the way that Subpostmasters were/are. You may be on to something there.