Traffic Cops BBC1

Author
Discussion

Elroy Blue

8,688 posts

192 months

Sunday 31st May 2015
quotequote all
Beati Dogu said:
They were about 40 miles from home when they were stopped, but they had no tax disk on display either. I was expecting it to be seized too, especially as they were clearly scumbags up to no good, it was 4am and the car was flagged up on ANPR for involvement in burglaries. So much for denying criminals the use of the motorway network.
Exactly what would Police be seizing a car that is taxed and insured for?

"I am seizing this because you are 40 miles form home".

This isn't Minority report. You may know they are up to no good. You may have intelligence that they have been up to no good in the past. Unless you have EVIDENCE that they are currently in the process of or have just committed crime, then you're stuffed.

I know who commits 90% of the burglaries in my area. It doesn't mean I can just arrest them on a whim.

northwest monkey

6,370 posts

189 months

Sunday 31st May 2015
quotequote all
Elroy Blue said:
Exactly what would Police be seizing a car that is taxed and insured for?
2 bald tyres?

Ray Luxury-Yacht

8,910 posts

216 months

Sunday 31st May 2015
quotequote all
Crossflow Kid said:
Zad said:
Crossflow Kid said:
What would you say the closing speed is then?
Relative closing speed is misleading. Two bodies colliding at 60mph each is not the same as 1 body at 120mph crashing into a static object.

The kinetic energy in a body is 0.5 * Mass * (Velocity squared).
So:

The kinetic energy in 2 vehicles at the same speed is 2 times that of 1 vehicle (the mass doubled).

The kinetic energy in 1 vehicle at double the speed is (2*velocity)^2 (The velocity doubled). In other words, 4 times the kinetic energy.

If you imagine the 2 objects colliding as being identical, then at the point of contact nothing moves. Each body decelerates from (say) 60mph to zero.
Did Plod say it was like crashing at 120mph or did he say it was a closing speed of 120mph? Can't actually remember, and can't be arsed watching again.
If it's the former then fair play, and well done with the maths. Not seen any of that since college! wink
I was screaming at the telly about this too. A Class 1 Police pursuit trained traffic officer, who isn't even aware of Newton's third law.....disappointing...


Elroy Blue

8,688 posts

192 months

Monday 1st June 2015
quotequote all
northwest monkey said:
2 bald tyres?
Nope. You cannot seize a car because it has bald tyres.

Beknown

254 posts

146 months

Monday 1st June 2015
quotequote all
Elroy Blue said:
northwest monkey said:
2 bald tyres?
Nope. You cannot seize a car because it has bald tyres.
That is dumb.

If I drove around at night with no physical headlights or something similar which relates to safety then I would expect to have my car seized, I would also expect the same for a car with bald tyres.

Maybe I am just unreasonable.

Elroy Blue

8,688 posts

192 months

Monday 1st June 2015
quotequote all
Best you write to your MP then and demand a change in the law.

Charlie1986

2,017 posts

135 months

Monday 1st June 2015
quotequote all
whens the next episode as its not on this week?

maurauth

749 posts

170 months

Tuesday 2nd June 2015
quotequote all
I know they can't seize the car but I thought they could deem it as undrivable and require you to have it transported to a garage or home?

droopsnoot

11,936 posts

242 months

Tuesday 2nd June 2015
quotequote all
Charlie1986 said:
whens the next episode as its not on this week?
Wasn't that a left-over episode from the last series? I seem to recall it fizzled out without warning last time it was on, but I forget to look at the date at the end of the credits. I wonder if they keep a couple of these in stock just in case they need something to fill an hour and have a maximum-repeats quota.

340600

552 posts

143 months

Tuesday 2nd June 2015
quotequote all
maurauth said:
I know they can't seize the car but I thought they could deem it as undrivable and require you to have it transported to a garage or home?
A PG9 prohibition is a possibility but the tyres would have to be absolutely horrendous. You'd also have to find a prohibition trained Officer which is easier said than done.

DoctorX

7,290 posts

167 months

Tuesday 28th July 2015
quotequote all
New series Thursday 8pm. North Yorkshire again.

Laurel Green

30,779 posts

232 months

Thursday 30th July 2015
quotequote all
Heads up.

iva cosworth

44,044 posts

163 months

Thursday 30th July 2015
quotequote all
Where's Jamie Theakston's voice narrating ?

Laurel Green

30,779 posts

232 months

Thursday 30th July 2015
quotequote all
Got a live one in the car I see.

MonkeyHanger

9,198 posts

242 months

Thursday 30th July 2015
quotequote all
"You're racist. I'm going to join IS"


Oh really Sir? In that case we'll put you on the next plane.


Job done.

RESSE

5,702 posts

221 months

Thursday 30th July 2015
quotequote all
iva cosworth said:
Where's Jamie Theakston's voice narrating ?
I recognise the new voice but cannot put a name to it.


Just remembered it is Steven Mackintosh.

Laurel Green

30,779 posts

232 months

Thursday 30th July 2015
quotequote all
This chaps not on any drugs.

Laurel Green

30,779 posts

232 months

Thursday 30th July 2015
quotequote all
Unearthed a bag of baby-formula. hehe

MonkeyHanger

9,198 posts

242 months

Thursday 30th July 2015
quotequote all
Horrible little Smack Rat.

RESSE

5,702 posts

221 months

Thursday 30th July 2015
quotequote all
Laurel Green said:
This chaps not on any drugs.
Nothing to see here officers.