Sherlock - BBC1

Author
Discussion

Patch1875

4,895 posts

133 months

Saturday 2nd January 2016
quotequote all
Only recently got into Sherlock thought this was great.

Countdown

39,963 posts

197 months

Saturday 2nd January 2016
quotequote all
Patch1875 said:
Only recently got into Sherlock thought this was great.
The early ones are great but the quality seems to have tailed off. Much like Dr Who.

chris watton

22,477 posts

261 months

Saturday 2nd January 2016
quotequote all
Me and my wife looked forward to watching this, my wife especially. I thought that it was going to be one-off special, set in the late Victorian era, and not a modern Sherlock's drug-fuelled hallucination.

First half was great, but during the second half my wife fell asleep. And I admit that I lost interest. Moriarty's over acting grated, too...

RichB

51,602 posts

285 months

Saturday 2nd January 2016
quotequote all
Legacywr said:
I'm glad I watched Kingsmen instead. I have recorded Sherlock, but because this thread has gone how it has, I may not bother watching it!
One should never allow opinion on Pistonheads to influence one. Watch it for what it is, a great bit of TV during a dearth of anything worth watching over the last week...

... then come on Pistonheads afterwards for the argument about it laugh

Blakewater

4,310 posts

158 months

Saturday 2nd January 2016
quotequote all
loafer123 said:
First Stephen Moffat ruined Doctor Who and now Sherlock.

Too clever by half spoiling what could have been good.
His stories are like The Emperor's New Clothes. We're supposed to think they're clever and so everyone says they are because no one dares stand up and say they're rubbish and don't make sense. People like to show off how clever they are by saying they can see clues and plot twists. If you do say it's all nonsensical people jump on you and say you're not intelligent enough to understand it and you get ridiculed. No one can actually explain what the story is in any episode of Dr Who or in this episode of Sherlock.

As far as I can see it was all supposed to have been a dream, which is the quintessential bad ending of a story and the very last way a writer should consider as an ending.

A lot of women objected to Sherlock Holmes pompously telling the suffragettes, who looked like the Klu-Klux-Klan, what their cause was and what they were fighting for.


Countdown

39,963 posts

197 months

Saturday 2nd January 2016
quotequote all
Blakewater said:
No one can actually explain what the story is in any episode of Dr Who or in this episode of Sherlock.

As far as I can see it was all supposed to have been a dream, which is the quintessential bad ending of a story and the very last way a writer should consider as an ending.

A lot of women objected to Sherlock Holmes pompously telling the suffragettes, who looked like the Klu-Klux-Klan, what their cause was and what they were fighting for.
Whilst I agree with you I think the story was [SPOILER ALERT]

[Modern day]
Moriarty seems to have come back from the dead after having blown his brains out. In order to figure out "how" Sherlock mantally revisits the case of "The Abominable Bride" which also features somebody coming back from the dead. Sherlock solves mystery and confirms that it's all just a trick.

Dennis99

308 posts

164 months

Saturday 2nd January 2016
quotequote all
techiedave said:
For some reason he reminded me of the late Robert Hardy in his mannerisims
He's not dead, he was 90 in October

Tuna

19,930 posts

285 months

Saturday 2nd January 2016
quotequote all
We enjoyed it. Sharp dialog, some good funny bits, action and a good twisty plot. It held together and made sense as far as I understood it, and leads very nicely into the next series without pulling impossible rabbits out of hats (Moriarty is dead, simples). Good Christmas viewing as far as I'm concerned.

DanielSan

18,806 posts

168 months

Saturday 2nd January 2016
quotequote all
If it seems to be going the way of the books still, albeit vaguely then I'd take a guess we're to expect a Sebastian Moran character that's carrying on Moriarty's work, with the obvious conclusion that Holmes will have to hunt him down etc etc.

coppice

8,624 posts

145 months

Saturday 2nd January 2016
quotequote all
Blakewater said:
His stories are like The Emperor's New Clothes. We're supposed to think they're clever and so everyone says they are because no one dares stand up and say they're rubbish and don't make sense. People like to show off how clever they are by saying they can see clues and plot twists. If you do say it's all nonsensical people jump on you and say you're not intelligent enough to understand it and you get ridiculed. No one can actually explain what the story is in any episode of Dr Who or in this episode of Sherlock.

As far as I can see it was all supposed to have been a dream, which is the quintessential bad ending of a story and the very last way a writer should consider as an ending.

A lot of women objected to Sherlock Holmes pompously telling the suffragettes, who looked like the Klu-Klux-Klan, what their cause was and what they were fighting for.
Not guilty of showing off but I will confess to having a different opinion to your own. You could try the off button perhaps ? It was indeed all a dream (or actually a dream inside a dream) so well done for spotting that anyway.

Easternlight

3,433 posts

145 months

Saturday 2nd January 2016
quotequote all
techiedave said:
ajprice said:
Fat Mycroft betting on life expectancy hehe
For some reason he reminded me of the late Robert Hardy in his mannerisims
Reminded me of Mr Creosote laugh

As for the story, as others have said started well but too up it's self in the second half.


outnumbered

4,090 posts

235 months

Saturday 2nd January 2016
quotequote all
I think it just shows they should stop making these now... The first few episodes were genuinely original, but in trying not to repeat themselves and continually do something different, it's just got too daft. The Dr Who comparisons are spot on, unfortunately.

Dal3D

1,178 posts

152 months

Saturday 2nd January 2016
quotequote all
So as an episode guide : Sherlock got out of a plane and into a car.

Fascinating.

(Although I do "get it" and thought it was very well done and just an excuse to get a "traditional" Sherlock out of their system)


FiF

44,121 posts

252 months

Saturday 2nd January 2016
quotequote all
Going to watch it again, so many things benefit from a rematch to pick up on stuff missed the first time. Some things, like The Wire and Fargo, even though you've followed the plot there's things that you go "Ah now that explains...!" Being a shallow oik it may turn out that a rewatch of Sherlock may turn a "What the juddering f...!" into "First impression correct" and the delete button pressed.

Blakewater

4,310 posts

158 months

Saturday 2nd January 2016
quotequote all
coppice said:
Blakewater said:
His stories are like The Emperor's New Clothes. We're supposed to think they're clever and so everyone says they are because no one dares stand up and say they're rubbish and don't make sense. People like to show off how clever they are by saying they can see clues and plot twists. If you do say it's all nonsensical people jump on you and say you're not intelligent enough to understand it and you get ridiculed. No one can actually explain what the story is in any episode of Dr Who or in this episode of Sherlock.

As far as I can see it was all supposed to have been a dream, which is the quintessential bad ending of a story and the very last way a writer should consider as an ending.

A lot of women objected to Sherlock Holmes pompously telling the suffragettes, who looked like the Klu-Klux-Klan, what their cause was and what they were fighting for.
Not guilty of showing off but I will confess to having a different opinion to your own. You could try the off button perhaps ? It was indeed all a dream (or actually a dream inside a dream) so well done for spotting that anyway.
We're all entitled to our opinions. I don't often watch Dr Who any more but I liked the earlier Sherlock Holmes episodes and watched this hoping to enjoy it. I watched it to the end hoping for a good conclusion to the story. I thought it started well but I was disappointed with its ending. I don't have to watch these shows but I confess to being annoyed that they've taken on a style I don't like when I used to enjoy them. If you like them, that's great for you.

My reference to people showing off was in consideration of very defensive, and even aggressive comments on social media from people saying those who didn't like it need to read more books. I understand what's being referred to in the original stories but I still don't like the construction of the current shows.

Snoggledog

7,073 posts

218 months

Saturday 2nd January 2016
quotequote all
I rather enjoyed that although will say that it started to get a bit weird toward the end. Reminded me of a film called "Inception" at times though.

Morningside

24,110 posts

230 months

Saturday 2nd January 2016
quotequote all
I liked it and better than the last episode. Maybe it has reached it peak but like Doctor Who I will keep watching as there is always that gem that shines out over the dross.

Still think it was on too long.


telecat

8,528 posts

242 months

Saturday 2nd January 2016
quotequote all
I liked it and felt the real conclusion will begin to appear in the new Season they shoot in April. Presumably when the Marval and DC universes have finished with BC and MF.

Blakewater

4,310 posts

158 months

Saturday 2nd January 2016
quotequote all
Morningside said:
I liked it and better than the last episode. Maybe it has reached it peak but like Doctor Who I will keep watching as there is always that gem that shines out over the dross.

Still think it was on too long.
She's not doing it any more unfortunately... wink

youngsyr

14,742 posts

193 months

Sunday 3rd January 2016
quotequote all
Blakewater said:
coppice said:
Blakewater said:
His stories are like The Emperor's New Clothes. We're supposed to think they're clever and so everyone says they are because no one dares stand up and say they're rubbish and don't make sense. People like to show off how clever they are by saying they can see clues and plot twists. If you do say it's all nonsensical people jump on you and say you're not intelligent enough to understand it and you get ridiculed. No one can actually explain what the story is in any episode of Dr Who or in this episode of Sherlock.

As far as I can see it was all supposed to have been a dream, which is the quintessential bad ending of a story and the very last way a writer should consider as an ending.

A lot of women objected to Sherlock Holmes pompously telling the suffragettes, who looked like the Klu-Klux-Klan, what their cause was and what they were fighting for.
Not guilty of showing off but I will confess to having a different opinion to your own. You could try the off button perhaps ? It was indeed all a dream (or actually a dream inside a dream) so well done for spotting that anyway.
We're all entitled to our opinions. I don't often watch Dr Who any more but I liked the earlier Sherlock Holmes episodes and watched this hoping to enjoy it. I watched it to the end hoping for a good conclusion to the story. I thought it started well but I was disappointed with its ending. I don't have to watch these shows but I confess to being annoyed that they've taken on a style I don't like when I used to enjoy them. If you like them, that's great for you.

My reference to people showing off was in consideration of very defensive, and even aggressive comments on social media from people saying those who didn't like it need to read more books. I understand what's being referred to in the original stories but I still don't like the construction of the current shows.
I really enjoyed it - thought it was one of the cleverest ways of introducing "time travel" I've come across in any format - absolutely no Sci Fi required at all, which is always the weakness in other stories.