Sherlock - BBC1

Author
Discussion

K12beano

20,854 posts

275 months

Monday 25th July 2016
quotequote all
Not 'til 2017 yikes

banghead

Truckosaurus

11,288 posts

284 months

Tuesday 26th July 2016
quotequote all
K12beano said:
Not 'til 2017
Although that was an advert for the American market. Will there be an Xmas showing in the UK?

TheLuke

2,218 posts

141 months

Wednesday 28th December 2016
quotequote all
New series starting Sunday.


NBTBRV8

2,062 posts

208 months

Thursday 29th December 2016
quotequote all
TheLuke said:
New series starting Sunday.
Thanks for the heads up!

oddball1313

1,191 posts

123 months

Sunday 1st January 2017
quotequote all
Boring rambling self indulgent toss and Martin Freeman still can't act

Same as last years drivel then.

Troubleatmill

10,210 posts

159 months

Sunday 1st January 2017
quotequote all
A bit of a yawn this one.

p1stonhead

25,545 posts

167 months

Sunday 1st January 2017
quotequote all
Another filler episode with nothing to do with Moriarty.

Disappeared up its own arse.

anonymous-user

54 months

Sunday 1st January 2017
quotequote all
Why do these programmes always end up abandoning the main character and start focusing on the backstory of a totally uninteresting sidekick? Who actually cares about what Watson's boring fking wife does?

Remember when Sherlock and John would just solve a case together?

RichB

51,572 posts

284 months

Sunday 1st January 2017
quotequote all
Well there's nothing much else on but it wasn't gripping was it. Oh how could a pathologist tell when someone died if all they've got is a burnt skeleton?

Pesty

42,655 posts

256 months

Sunday 1st January 2017
quotequote all
Symbolica said:
Why do these programmes always end up abandoning the main character and start focusing on the backstory of a totally uninteresting sidekick? Who actually cares about what Watson's boring fking wife does?

Remember when Sherlock and John would just solve a case together?
Yep liked the start, all went down hill when she came in. But I suppose they have to have a super hero woman for quotas or somthing.

K12beano

20,854 posts

275 months

Sunday 1st January 2017
quotequote all
Well

Contrary to the growing consensus above, I enjoyed the storytelling and thought the dramatisation made absolutely stunningly good TV. Well acted and directed!

p1stonhead

25,545 posts

167 months

Sunday 1st January 2017
quotequote all
Was the red head literally NOTHING to do with the episode? Just a bit of filler?!

Or did I miss something?

greygoose

8,260 posts

195 months

Sunday 1st January 2017
quotequote all
Symbolica said:
Why do these programmes always end up abandoning the main character and start focusing on the backstory of a totally uninteresting sidekick? Who actually cares about what Watson's boring fking wife does?

Remember when Sherlock and John would just solve a case together?
Indeed, why not just have a crime and investigate it rather than all the nonsense about her being a ninja.

captainzep

13,305 posts

192 months

Sunday 1st January 2017
quotequote all
They have a jewel in Benedict Cucumberpatch and a rich literary history to draw on.

Initial episodes were largely great and with limited seasonal outings no need to flog a format to death a la Jonathan Creek. -So why did the aquarium sharks feel like clever symbolism to show how many have been jumped in the last couple of shows? Some Holby City acting and ludicrous favours asked of the audience, (jumping in front of a bullet shot from feet away, some strangely unlikely sets, and vinyl seats in a Focus?) There's just no need to bring Hollywood B movie action into the mix and Martin Freeman must feel like he's got on the wrong train.

fk off BBC.

Disastrous

10,083 posts

217 months

Sunday 1st January 2017
quotequote all
That was utter dogst.

The car mystery made me think we might actually get a proper mystery like in the first couple of series but then it all went sub-Bourne with that awful secret agent wife.

I liked it SO much up the Reichenbach Fall that I especially hate what it is now...

l354uge

2,895 posts

121 months

Sunday 1st January 2017
quotequote all
In the writers quest to flesh out the stories of the sidekicks they forgot to add much mystery solving, apart from me trying to work how John thought be would get away with what he did when he's friends with the worlds detective and married to a spy..

MartG

20,677 posts

204 months

Sunday 1st January 2017
quotequote all
p1stonhead said:
Was the red head literally NOTHING to do with the episode? Just a bit of filler?!

Or did I miss something?
I suspect she'll turn up in later episodes as Watson's new girlfriend but then turn out out be Moriarty's sister or something.....

Jonesy23

4,650 posts

136 months

Sunday 1st January 2017
quotequote all
Also why exactly did she jump in front of the bullet? If she'd done it for John it might have made a tiny degree of sense but as it was...

Maybe the next one might be better, though to be honest I suspect any story not based off one of the classics is going to be more about the writer indulging themselves rather than anything decent.


p1stonhead

25,545 posts

167 months

Sunday 1st January 2017
quotequote all
I think when they showed her jump, Sherlock was in his mind palace and she actually jumped before the bullet was fired. It was just done quite poorly.

Or she can stop time....

SGirl

7,918 posts

261 months

Sunday 1st January 2017
quotequote all
Hm. That wasn't as good as I'd hoped. There was so little Sherlock-Watson interaction, which has been one of the strengths of the show so far. Mind you, I did allow myself a little cheer at the shooting scene at the Aquarium - suspending disbelief is a bit difficult when we're constantly being asked to think Mary is a super-skilled ninja assassin type. I wonder whether Molly will play a more prominent part now so that the show isn't too "male" for the BBC.