Bad Films I watched this weekend

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

Asterix

24,438 posts

229 months

Monday 16th February 2015
quotequote all
RESSE said:
Inside Llewyn Davis

Not one of the Cohen's finest.

Story didn't go anywhere (in my opinion), and not worth sticking with until the bitter end.

Shame as it started out very promising.
Yeah - that was pretty pants.

I had high hopes as a big Coen's fan.

Got up and started doing stuff around the 30 minute mark.

GadgeS3C

4,516 posts

165 months

Monday 16th February 2015
quotequote all
Carl_Spackler said:
Transcendence.

It was awful, I can't even begin to describe how much the whole thing didn't make sense.
yes

anonymous-user

55 months

Monday 16th February 2015
quotequote all
Fury, from hero to zero in about 75 minutes, started off so well, but the final battle was ridiculous, what were they thinking?

chris watton

22,477 posts

261 months

Monday 16th February 2015
quotequote all
ash73 said:
CoinSl0t said:
Fury
You must be joking. It's hard hitting, it puts you right there in the tank, the effects and authenticity are brilliant, the scrap with the Tiger is brutal, and the characters are convincing; even mentalist Shia LaBeouf nails it. Ok the last 20 mins are a tad OTT, but it's still a very good film.
I haven't watched it yet, but intend to very soon, but I have heard many complain about a Sherman slugging it out with a Tiger - and winning.

Only in Hollywood...

qube_TA

8,402 posts

246 months

Monday 16th February 2015
quotequote all
Asterix said:
RESSE said:
Inside Llewyn Davis

Not one of the Cohen's finest.

Story didn't go anywhere (in my opinion), and not worth sticking with until the bitter end.

Shame as it started out very promising.
Yeah - that was pretty pants.

I had high hopes as a big Coen's fan.

Got up and started doing stuff around the 30 minute mark.
I enjoyed this one, it's just a slice of the existence of that man in that world. True it doesn't really go anywhere but the way it was shot and the attention to detail I found compelling. It's certainly not a mainstream film, a bit arty I guess.



qube_TA

8,402 posts

246 months

Monday 16th February 2015
quotequote all
GadgeS3C said:
Carl_Spackler said:
Transcendence.

It was awful, I can't even begin to describe how much the whole thing didn't make sense.
yes
yes

Try 'Her' instead, much better.



BlackST

9,080 posts

166 months

Monday 16th February 2015
quotequote all
Jupiter Ascending.
First time i've ever walked out of a film before it had finished.
Poor plot. Predictable. Just generally poor.
3/10

jbudgie

8,935 posts

213 months

Monday 16th February 2015
quotequote all
GadgeS3C said:
Carl_Spackler said:
Transcendence.

It was awful, I can't even begin to describe how much the whole thing didn't make sense.
yes
+ 200

Tiggsy

10,261 posts

253 months

Tuesday 17th February 2015
quotequote all
chris watton said:
I haven't watched it yet, but intend to very soon, but I have heard many complain about a Sherman slugging it out with a Tiger - and winning.

Only in Hollywood...
Bet thats a fun dinner party - what else do you hear....how the planes in Top Gun weren'treally Migs? biggrin

JonRB

74,597 posts

273 months

Tuesday 17th February 2015
quotequote all
chris watton said:
I haven't watched it yet, but intend to very soon, but I have heard many complain about a Sherman slugging it out with a Tiger - and winning.

Only in Hollywood...
I can't speak for the film because I haven't seen it, but there were incidents in WW2 of Shermans taking out Tigers. But it wasn't "slugging it out" - it was firing at close range into the thinner side armour of the Tiger. Face on, a Sherman didn't have a chance against a Tiger - its main gun was unable to penetrate the Tiger's frontal armour.

(I happened to be watching 'Famous Tank Battles' on the Discovery Channel the other day and it was about just such a battle)



Edited by JonRB on Tuesday 17th February 09:22

chris watton

22,477 posts

261 months

Tuesday 17th February 2015
quotequote all
Tiggsy said:
chris watton said:
I haven't watched it yet, but intend to very soon, but I have heard many complain about a Sherman slugging it out with a Tiger - and winning.

Only in Hollywood...
Bet thats a fun dinner party - what else do you hear....how the planes in Top Gun weren'treally Migs? biggrin
Dinner party?

I was merely relaying what I had read from another site, as I was interested to find out a little more before buying the film - with one comment suggesting that the action taken place was lifted from a Canadian Sherman unit, and not US.

As for the dinner party comment, I think you have me all wrong, I'm more of a (very occasional) Balti on my lap type of man... smile
I research, design and build period ship models for a living, and I thoroughly enjoy Black sails on Amazon prime. I have never once pointed out the huge inaccuracies on the ships in that, I just sit back and enjoy, so even your comments regarding Top Gun are misplaced. Sorry.


Bullett

10,889 posts

185 months

Tuesday 17th February 2015
quotequote all
IS this the point where we talk about Kelly's Heros?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T1eFePf6mWM

Elroy Blue

8,689 posts

193 months

Tuesday 17th February 2015
quotequote all
Fury was indeed a film that could have been great, but became an expensive version of the A-Team.

I started to watch a film my wife got on DVD. 'The Love Punch'. Pierce Brosnan and Emma Thompson. I lasted about 30 minutes, the missus not much more. Absolute rubbish

irocfan

40,530 posts

191 months

Tuesday 17th February 2015
quotequote all
Bullett said:
IS this the point where we talk about Kelly's Heros?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T1eFePf6mWM
O/T just found out that Kelly's Heroes is based on a real story! http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0065938/trivia

anonymous-user

55 months

Tuesday 17th February 2015
quotequote all
ash73 said:
You must be joking. It's hard hitting, it puts you right there in the tank, the effects and authenticity are brilliant, the scrap with the Tiger is brutal, and the characters are convincing; even mentalist Shia LaBeouf nails it. Ok the last 20 mins are a tad OTT, but it's still a very good film.
I agree with all you are saying, but the last 20 or so minutes ruined the film for me.

When the boy ran up the road to play look out and he saw the regiment of German soldiers marching towards them, the Germans were well armed with lots of them carrying RPG's. But, the final battle with the dead tank went on for hours, going from day to night, but nobody thought to loosen off a few RPG's at the tank?!

Plus, within the tank you'd be in a constant blind spot, how in pitch black (except for a few burning houses etc), would you see somebody sneaking up and sticking some explosives under the tank?

And the final scene where the lad is spotted, but his arch enemy says nothing... come on that's stretching it too far.

So near, yet so far for me as I really wanted to enjoy this.

Asterix

24,438 posts

229 months

Tuesday 17th February 2015
quotequote all
Fury isn't worthy of being mentioned in the same sentence as Das Boot.

Das Boot is one of the best films ever made and Fury is a middling and ultimately disappointing War film.

Moulder

1,466 posts

213 months

Tuesday 17th February 2015
quotequote all
Oldboy

The remake by Spike Lee with Josh Brolin. Came away from it thinking that was a bit odd; a pantomime villain, fight scenes where you can see people waiting for their cue or just flapping about in the background, and a storyline/premise which started off OK and then went downhill quickly to the point where most people wouldn't have given a monkeys.

To balance this ViewLondon said "solidly entertaining thriller", though not sure if "solidly" is faint praise.

3/10

chris watton

22,477 posts

261 months

Tuesday 17th February 2015
quotequote all
ash73 said:
chris watton said:
I was interested to find out a little more before buying the film
I reckon you'll enjoy it, blame me if you don't. Honestly it feels like the actors literally lived in that tank. I can still hear LaBeouf screaming "on the way!"
Have just bought it on Amazon. smile

FourWheelDrift

88,550 posts

285 months

Tuesday 17th February 2015
quotequote all
Bullett said:
IS this the point where we talk about Kelly's Heros?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T1eFePf6mWM
But Oddball is commanding a post-war Yugoslavian E4 Sherman with the higher velocity 76mm gun anti-tank gun (which was fitted to later WWII Shermans).

So............er...................yeah, so don't hit me with them negative waves so early in the morning. . hehe

GadgeS3C

4,516 posts

165 months

Tuesday 17th February 2015
quotequote all
FourWheelDrift said:
Bullett said:
IS this the point where we talk about Kelly's Heros?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T1eFePf6mWM
But Oddball is commanding a post-war Yugoslavian E4 Sherman with the higher velocity 76mm gun anti-tank gun (which was fitted to later WWII Shermans).

So............er...................yeah, so don't hit me with them negative waves so early in the morning. . hehe
Firing at a glammed up T-34.



Sorry - couldn't resist it wink
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED