Chris Huhne... going soon?
Discussion
Quoted from May 2011
Nope
It will be another slimy clone saying anything to get to the top, the name and face may change but the person won'tSeen any difference?
Nope
thinfourth2 said:
turbobloke said:
Hope so.
My, won't we all miss him.
And his replacement will overturn all the climate change legislation and be a voice of sanity in parliamentMy, won't we all miss him.
Nope
It will be another slimy clone saying anything to get to the top, the name and face may change but the person won't
Nope
Mill Wheel said:
.... isn't Huhnes ex supposed to have discussed the possibility of taking the points with a female friend who is a judge, who advised against such action?
SOmeone will correct me but wasnt a Judge seriously bolloked for not reporting the conversation or some such during the whole process or post the alleged 'offence' when asked by Ms Pryce?Found a link (sorry about the source but it was the easiest link
)http://order-order.com/2012/10/09/huhne-prosecutio...
Judge Briscoe!
No doubt he will get off on a technicality or 'legal win' and then spout about the 'sword of justice' or similar - hopefully with a similar outcome
(Google it if you cant remember)
Derek Smith said:
Taken from another thread: It is possibly a pre-trial hearing where the defence will put a 'no case to answer' submission to the court. One might be tempted to think that the wife will withdraw her statements. Huhne is going which tends to indicate he will come out of the court with a halo and tell the awaiting throng that he's innocent and has no stain on his character.
I may be wrong, but my understanding is that 'no case to answer' submissions come at 'half time' during trial, after the prosecution has been heard. Perhaps there's an abuse of process hearing taking place, but I haven't seen it reported anywhere.10 Pence Short said:
Derek Smith said:
Taken from another thread: It is possibly a pre-trial hearing where the defence will put a 'no case to answer' submission to the court. One might be tempted to think that the wife will withdraw her statements. Huhne is going which tends to indicate he will come out of the court with a halo and tell the awaiting throng that he's innocent and has no stain on his character.
I may be wrong, but my understanding is that 'no case to answer' submissions come at 'half time' during trial, after the prosecution has been heard. Perhaps there's an abuse of process hearing taking place, but I haven't seen it reported anywhere.Is every hearing and stage 'in camera' or are there simply very tight reporting restrictions? So tight that it hasn't even made it to some boards such as this and Guido?
10 Pence Short said:
Except for certain circumstances or by order of the court, hearings are normally held in open court and can be reported.
Sorry - I was referring particularly to these proceedings.My understanding/guess is that there needs to be a good reason for reporting restrictions or 'in camera' and I was wondering what they may be in this particular case.
Reporting restrictions wouldn't stop someone popping along and watching? as opposed to nobody allowed in to Court bar the snakes and their clients???
Can't find anything on today's proceedings
jesusbuiltmycar said:
link not work for mePesty said:
jesusbuiltmycar said:
link not work for me
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff