News of the World
Discussion
littleowl said:
They've surpassed themselves this time. It's one thing hacking into Prescotts phone or Sienna Millers, but to DELETE MESSAGES as well???!!! Isn't that tampering with evidence/potential evidence as to what actually happened to the poor girl at the time she was abducted?
edit for retarded typing
Edited by theironduke on Monday 4th July 22:21
littleowl said:
Just hope that they throw the book at the codpiece at the NOTW responsible for this, plus the piece of that they hired to do this....
Just don't get how a normal person could do it. Must be a proper twisted . Definitely deserves porridge, preferably with the nonces, rapists and murderers.theironduke said:
Just don't get how a normal person could do it. Must be a proper twisted . Definitely deserves porridge, preferably with the nonces, rapists and murderers.
"Independent Private Investigator" hired by the NOTW apparently...and yep, hopefully a stint in the chokey will be forthcoming...Oakey said:
Kwai Chang Caine said:
Sorry for being thick, but how easy is that to do?
Call the number and when you hear the greeting message press *. Then enter the pin. Dunno if it works anymore, it used to.See, to me, if there is no password, then it's not the heinous crime it's being made out to be. Ok, the consequences in this case weren't that nice but I find it hard to get particularly angry about.
Now, if they're using something a little more sinister to hack protected mailboxes; yeah, that's not cricket.
Oakey said:
I'm sure it falls foul of some communications law. Probably more so when they started tampering with said voicebox and deleting messages so people could leave new messages for them to listen to.
It falls foul of Perverting the Course of Justice in all probability if they deleted evidence. Certainly they tampered with evidence given how much weight was given to the phone at the time. People could go to jail for many years.davepoth said:
Oakey said:
I'm sure it falls foul of some communications law. Probably more so when they started tampering with said voicebox and deleting messages so people could leave new messages for them to listen to.
It falls foul of Perverting the Course of Justice in all probability if they deleted evidence. Certainly they tampered with evidence given how much weight was given to the phone at the time. People could go to jail for many years.Not trying to defend NOTW here; just trying to figure out exactly what they've done.
Kwai Chang Caine said:
Cheers
See, to me, if there is no password, then it's not the heinous crime it's being made out to be. Ok, the consequences in this case weren't that nice but I find it hard to get particularly angry about.
What, like walking into someone's house and nicking their stuff cos they left the back door unlocked? See, to me, if there is no password, then it's not the heinous crime it's being made out to be. Ok, the consequences in this case weren't that nice but I find it hard to get particularly angry about.
Oakey said:
I'm sure it falls foul of some communications law. Probably more so when they started tampering with said voicebox and deleting messages so people could leave new messages for them to listen to.
As I am led to believe, that Bellfield character who killed Millie also killed two others after he had killed her. Part of this affair has focused on whether or not the police could have caught him earlier, therby preventing two more murders. Perhaps if the police had had access to these 'deleted messages' at some earlier point in time, then Bellfield would have been caught before he could commit these other killings?I don't know how aware/unaware the police were of these missing messages, but I do wonder if the who deleted them might have in any way contributed to the other two murders?
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff