|
martin84
5,366 posts
22 months
|
Dr Jekyll said: So who is it? I could tell you but if I get done for contempt of court again I'm going to prison.
|
|
|
Pints
14,681 posts
63 months
|
|
|
z4me
268 posts
38 months
|
Sandi Toksvig! Christ, Stevie Wonder must be in on it too !
|
|
|
number 46
363 posts
117 months
|
Given other info on here and the web I get the impression that F is another famous Star?
|
|
|
Lost_BMW
10,618 posts
45 months
|
z4me said: Sandi Toksvig! Christ, Stevie Wonder must be in on it too ! Cruel... but funny!
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
thehawk
8,384 posts
76 months
|
I always thought Sandi Toksvig was a man, I wasn't far wrong.
|
|
|
V8mate
34,924 posts
58 months
|
martin84 said: Dr Jekyll said: So who is it? I could tell you but if I get done for contempt of court again I'm going to prison. Write the name out backwards. The rozzers will never get that.
|
|
|
RYH64E
3,089 posts
113 months
|
|
|
Lost_BMW
10,618 posts
45 months
|
Dr Jekyll said: Todays Sunday Times quotes a witness as describing 3 celebrities described as JS, G and F molesting young girls.
They've since confirmed JS was Saville and G was Glitter, but apparently F can't be named for legal reasons.
So who is it? Couldn't possibly be as obvious of them to use JS for Jimmy Saville, G for Glitter and F for, well F for..? Surely not that signposted, or are they being deliberately 'deliberate'?
|
|
|
Dr Jekyll
5,517 posts
130 months
|
Lost_BMW said: Couldn't possibly be as obvious of them to use JS for Jimmy Saville, G for Glitter and F for, well F for..?
Surely not that signposted, or are they being deliberately 'deliberate'? Must admit my first thought was that the Star in question had a name beginning with F, but I just wondered if there were any other candidates.
|
|
|
Oakey
13,698 posts
85 months
|
Derek Smith said: I won't hear a word against Stalin. He was never convicted of anything when he was alive. Al Capone was only convicted of tax evasion, how dare people call him a gangster when all he did was get sloppy with his tax returns
|
|
|
Super Slo Mo
2,233 posts
67 months
|
Dr Jekyll said: Lost_BMW said: Couldn't possibly be as obvious of them to use JS for Jimmy Saville, G for Glitter and F for, well F for..?
Surely not that signposted, or are they being deliberately 'deliberate'? Must admit my first thought was that the Star in question had a name beginning with F, but I just wondered if there were any other candidates. An individual was named and interviewed in yesterday's Telegraph, as someone has named him as being present at one 'session'. His name fits the description above, but he vehemently denies it, plausibly in my view, but you'd need to read it and draw your own conclusions. I worry slightly that we're now likely to get some malicious accusations based on nothing more than attention seeking, or vivid imaginations. It's going to be all but impossible to prove either way, but in the meantime, it'll be disappointing if innocent people end up getting smeared because of one or two individual's misdemeanours.
|
|
|
number 46
363 posts
117 months
|
The plot thickens, Starrs denial does seem pretty strong. I.e not the usual non specific 'I've done nothing wrong' type of statement. Of course F could refer to the surname of the 3rd man, that opens up generations of posibilities!! Usually the papers like to give clues even if that can,t actually name the person. I guess will well have to wait and see
|
|
|
chris watton
12,349 posts
129 months
|
Dr Jekyll said: Must admit my first thought was that the Star in question had a name beginning with F, but I just wondered if there were any other candidates. Florence, from Florence and the Machine? Sound's just like him!
|
|
|
RYH64E
3,089 posts
113 months
|
number 46 said: The plot thickens, Starrs denial does seem pretty strong. I.e not the usual non specific 'I've done nothing wrong' type of statement. Of course F could refer to the surname of the 3rd man, that opens up generations of posibilities!! Usually the papers like to give clues even if that can,t actually name the person. I guess will well have to wait and see The allegation would appear to be directed at Starr, whether he did or not is obviously a different question. I linked an article above that named him, the girl in question, and Savile. article said: Veteran comedian Freddie Starr has denied allegations he attempted to grope an underage girl in the 1970s.
The funnyman has dismissed Karin Ward's allegation that he tried to touch her breasts when she was 14, while visiting late entertainer Sir Jimmy Savile at the BBC Television Centre in London.
|
|
|
CooperD
1,066 posts
46 months
|
|
|
Digby
3,144 posts
115 months
|
|
|
groak
3,254 posts
48 months
|
Alvin Lee ? (he was pretty upfront about it  Mind you, the number of cover versions over the years from S-B williamson to yardbirds to TYA would probably fill several docks with underrage predators....
|
|
|
groak
3,254 posts
48 months
|
Frik said: .... There certainly have been different attitudes to post-pubescent but underage girls in the past and maybe in the future. I doubt the law will change much though.
Sexual assault remains a crime, as does statutory rape. Whether the suspect is dead or alive there is a potential crime that needs to be investigated. Dead or alive? Hmmm. Cops and courts are going to be busy. Where do we start? Caligula? Nero? Further back? UK only? Cases involving still living victims only? Paedos and statutory rapists apparently have organised 'circles' and certainly have organised stimulative material including all over the internet. Now a pantheon of well-loved celebrity indulgers starts emerging. Well-worn path to acceptability I'd say. Am I wrong? is the genie going back into the bottle?
|
|
|
JuniorD
3,067 posts
92 months
|
Well I certainly wouldn't be surprised if one day the age of consent is lowered still further. It won't change what constitutes rape but it at the stroke of a pen a fair amount of otherwise noncey activity would be suddenly legal. Politicians will be able to sleep soundly at night in the arms of their little rent boys.
|
|
