Jimmy Savile

Author
Discussion

The Hypno-Toad

12,278 posts

205 months

Monday 4th May 2015
quotequote all
wc98 said:
eccles said:
Well you don't want any awkward questions just before an election do you?
this^
Undoubtedly. See the Chilcott enquiry.









Oh no, wait a minute, you're not allowed to. And if Labour win you probably never will be.

Getragdogleg

8,763 posts

183 months

Monday 4th May 2015
quotequote all
I have no interest in what some jumped up celeb looks like naked yet someone leaked tons of them a while ago, why cant someone leak this report ?

fk the sensitivities of politicos and their minions, get the whole lot out there and start naming and shaming the Savile enablers.

dudleybloke

19,804 posts

186 months

Monday 4th May 2015
quotequote all
Those involved in the cover-up need to be named and prosecuted too.

Your either with the nonces or against them.

And "saving embarrassment" is no fking excuse.

dudleybloke

19,804 posts

186 months

Sunday 10th May 2015
quotequote all
North Yorkshire police refuse a F.O.I.A request about the Savbeast.

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/north_yorks...

zygalski

7,759 posts

145 months

Sunday 10th May 2015
quotequote all
dudleybloke said:
...Your either with the nonces or against them...
Well I wouldn't go out of my way to be in their company, but equally wouldn't wish them dead.
To be honest, the only time I think about the issue is when I log in here & see it near the top of the agenda, or hear about another 1970's pop star or DJ who fondled the wrong 15 year old.
It's an isolated & massively overblown issue in my opinion. I live in a road which is totally blocked-in for 30 minutes at 08:45 & 15:15 because fat parents can't make their fat kids walk half a mile to school for fear of a chubby-chaser paedo snatching them off the pavement. rolleyes

Derek Smith

45,613 posts

248 months

Sunday 10th May 2015
quotequote all
The Hypno-Toad said:
Undoubtedly. See the Chilcott enquiry.

Oh no, wait a minute, you're not allowed to. And if Labour win you probably never will be.
We await the tory party releasing it.

Holding my breath . . . . NOW!

carinaman

21,287 posts

172 months

Sunday 10th May 2015
quotequote all
drivetrain said:
dudleybloke said:
North Yorkshire police refuse a F.O.I.A request about the Savbeast.

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/north_yorks...
Does the (lack of) response of SYP not warrant a formal complaint to be investigated by the police PSD?
The Daily Mail got the Office of Information Commissioner involved on Cyril Smith information:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2984529/Ca...

dudleybloke

19,804 posts

186 months

Wednesday 13th May 2015
quotequote all
His victims have been offered counciling from the Tavistock Institute.

Laurel Green

30,776 posts

232 months

Wednesday 13th May 2015
quotequote all
A 69-year-old man has been arrested by detectives from Operation Yewtree--> Clicky

The Hypno-Toad

12,278 posts

205 months

Wednesday 13th May 2015
quotequote all
Laurel Green said:
A 69-year-old man has been arrested by detectives from Operation Yewtree--> Clicky
A quick google of UK male celebrities aged 69 brings up some very interesting names.


FourWheelDrift

88,494 posts

284 months

Wednesday 13th May 2015
quotequote all
The Hypno-Toad said:
Laurel Green said:
A 69-year-old man has been arrested by detectives from Operation Yewtree--> Clicky
A quick google of UK male celebrities aged 69 brings up some very interesting names.
Going on age and location it's surely (without naming names) one they have arrested before.

grumbledoak

31,532 posts

233 months

Thursday 14th May 2015
quotequote all
Why is his name treated as a secret when arrest is a matter of public record? Surely it cannot be libel to state "xxxx is 69" or even simply "xxxx was arrested" when both are facts.

If it is Who I think it is he is already on the sex offenders register for paying for kiddie pics.


Edited by grumbledoak on Thursday 14th May 06:02

Andy Zarse

10,868 posts

247 months

Thursday 14th May 2015
quotequote all
grumbledoak said:
Why is his name treated as a secret when arrest is a matter of public record? Surely it cannot be libel to state "xxxx is 69" or even simply "xxxx was arrested" when both are facts.

If it is Who I think it is he is already on the sex offenders register for paying for kiddie pics.


Edited by grumbledoak on Thursday 14th May 06:02
Michael Eavis must already be on the phone to Mick Jagger... smile

dudleybloke

19,804 posts

186 months

Thursday 14th May 2015
quotequote all
I'm sure whatever happened was purely research.

FourWheelDrift

88,494 posts

284 months

Thursday 14th May 2015
quotequote all
grumbledoak said:
Why is his name treated as a secret when arrest is a matter of public record? Surely it cannot be libel to state "xxxx is 69" or even simply "xxxx was arrested" when both are facts.

If it is Who I think it is he is already on the sex offenders register for paying for kiddie pics.


Edited by grumbledoak on Thursday 14th May 06:02
Says on the news it's a Milton Keynes based celeb, him above doesn't live in MK.

Voldemort

6,134 posts

278 months

Friday 15th May 2015
quotequote all

dudleybloke

19,804 posts

186 months

Friday 15th May 2015
quotequote all
The cynic in me thinks he will never see the inside of a cell.

grumbledoak

31,532 posts

233 months

Friday 15th May 2015
quotequote all
dudleybloke said:
The cynic in me thinks he will never see the inside of a cell.
Indeed. But being "conveniently too demented for your own nonce trial" is a confession in all but name. That may have to do.

dudleybloke

19,804 posts

186 months

Friday 15th May 2015
quotequote all
Q.. What do Grenville Janner and Victor Montagu have in common???????

A... http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/may/15/to...

Yet again the "old boy network" is proving to be the little boy network.

The dirty noncey bastids.

Beati Dogu

8,885 posts

139 months

Friday 15th May 2015
quotequote all
grumbledoak said:
Why is his name treated as a secret when arrest is a matter of public record? Surely it cannot be libel to state "xxxx is 69" or even simply "xxxx was arrested" when both are facts.

If it is Who I think it is he is already on the sex offenders register for paying for kiddie pics.


Edited by grumbledoak on Thursday 14th May 06:02
Fiddling About??

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hFhO7EU08Tg