Bakerloo Line Collapsed?
Discussion
iphonedyou said:
Du1point8 said:
What it looks like to me is there is an issue on the line, the RMT called in the tunnel collapse (even though they have no men down there) to gain support for their strike and spread panic.
If this is in anyway true then they should be disgusted with themselves.
(Its the kind of thing Bob would do though)
I don't know - personally, I'd be disinclined to support them if I thought a partial collapse had occured while they were striking. It would sort of show how dangerous it is for them to strike.If this is in anyway true then they should be disgusted with themselves.
(Its the kind of thing Bob would do though)
But it wouldn't surprise me, right enough.
So does this mean the tubes are safer when there is no maintenance?!
Du1point8 said:
collateral said:
BBC said the people striking aren't the ones who look after that tunnel.
but hypothetically speaking, do the ones on that route now need to help cover out the other routes so are now understaffed?Nothing to see here, just the traditional ph outcry of 'OMG lazy fking strikers'.
I noticed in the plod section some of the BiB on here are petitioning for industrial rights...
collateral said:
I don't know how the underground's handling cover.
Nothing to see here, just the traditional ph outcry of 'OMG lazy fking strikers'.
I noticed in the plod section some of the BiB on here are petitioning for industrial rights...
Not me!Nothing to see here, just the traditional ph outcry of 'OMG lazy fking strikers'.
I noticed in the plod section some of the BiB on here are petitioning for industrial rights...
I start working for them in September.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff