Anger and happiness on a Friday afternoon

Anger and happiness on a Friday afternoon

Author
Discussion

CommanderJameson

Original Poster:

22,096 posts

227 months

Friday 15th June 2012
quotequote all
So a little girl was banned from taking pictures of her school dinner and blogging about it.

Boo!

This makes me angry.

On the other hand, she has a link to a charity that helps feed children in Africa, and as Argyll & Bute Council's arseheaded decision has hit the twitterwebs, it's gone mental.

Yay!

Click this one, give them some money

This makes me happy.

Some Gump

12,715 posts

187 months

Friday 15th June 2012
quotequote all
I was wondering about that - what right do the council have to stop her? If they're so embarassed by their piss poor catering, sort the catering, not the reporting of same said?

anonymous-user

55 months

Friday 15th June 2012
quotequote all
From the BBC website:



WTF is that abomination?!

KaraK

13,187 posts

210 months

Friday 15th June 2012
quotequote all
Saw this on the BBC site earlier, if Argyll & Bute Council are indeed trying to keep a lid on any potentially embarrassing posts by the girl they would have done well to google the term "Streisand effect" first hehe

AndrewW-G

11,968 posts

218 months

Friday 15th June 2012
quotequote all
CommanderJameson said:
So a little girl was banned from taking pictures of her school dinner and blogging about it.

Boo!

This makes me angry.

On the other hand, she has a link to a charity that helps feed children in Africa, and as Argyll & Bute Council's arseheaded decision has hit the twitterwebs, it's gone mental.

Yay!

Click this one, give them some money

This makes me happy.
Now up to over £12.5k smile you really have to wonder about the intelligence of the council bod who vetoed her blog.

KrazyIvan

4,341 posts

176 months

Friday 15th June 2012
quotequote all
This is some what backfiring on the council, wonder what their next genius step with be hehe

UF

7,018 posts

184 months

Friday 15th June 2012
quotequote all
We need more people like her.

zbc

855 posts

152 months

Friday 15th June 2012
quotequote all
I know being accurate is sometimes frowned upon on PH but I can't see where her blogging is banned. All she's being banned from is taking pictures of the food which seems a bit less unreasonable but hey why let accuracy get in the way of a ranty Friday non-story

Einion Yrth

19,575 posts

245 months

Friday 15th June 2012
quotequote all
zbc said:
All she's being banned from is taking pictures of the food which seems a bit less unreasonable
Why does this seem less unreasonable to you? 'cause it surely doesn't to me.

iphonedyou

9,262 posts

158 months

Friday 15th June 2012
quotequote all
zbc said:
I know being accurate is sometimes frowned upon on PH but I can't see where her blogging is banned. All she's being banned from is taking pictures of the food which seems a bit less unreasonable but hey why let accuracy get in the way of a ranty Friday non-story
She's being banned from taking photographs. Of food.

Explain how that's reasonable, if you would? I genuinely don't see it.

AndrewW-G

11,968 posts

218 months

Friday 15th June 2012
quotequote all
zbc said:
I know being accurate is sometimes frowned upon on PH but I can't see where her blogging is banned. All she's being banned from is taking pictures of the food which seems a bit less unreasonable but hey why let accuracy get in the way of a ranty Friday non-story
A quick look at the blog, would reveal that the primary part of each review is a photograph . . . .if your drawing parallels with pistonheads, imagine the impact of the dirty takeaway thread, without pictures wink

broadside

856 posts

283 months

Friday 15th June 2012
quotequote all
Heard about this on 5-live this morning, so had a look at this young girls blog from the above link.

I can't see what the fuss is about. She is just reviewing what she eats at school and rating it. No different than a restaurant critic does. If it helps to maintain school meal standards then thats all to the good.

Aparently this girl wants a career in journalism, this is an excellent way for her to learn her craft from an early age and it should be encouraged. Her writing is excellent and interesting. No where in her blog have I seen any unreasonable comment about the food. She's being objective and now wants to understand where her food comes from.

I'd love her to keep on doing her blog and not take this fuss from the council do-gooders. One of life's lessons, get knocked down, dust yourself off and carry on!!

gingerpaul

2,929 posts

244 months

Friday 15th June 2012
quotequote all
The socialist mantra of "If you have nothing to hide you have nothing to fear" doesn't seem to apply here does it. Surprising given the inevitable leaning-to-the-left stance of most teachers and council workers.

ofcorsa

3,527 posts

244 months

Friday 15th June 2012
quotequote all
That was a really well written blog, great name too. Shame the photos have stopped but artists impressions will be ok i imagine.

bitchstewie

51,548 posts

211 months

Friday 15th June 2012
quotequote all

zbc

855 posts

152 months

Friday 15th June 2012
quotequote all
Einion Yrth said:
zbc said:
All she's being banned from is taking pictures of the food which seems a bit less unreasonable
Why does this seem less unreasonable to you? 'cause it surely doesn't to me.
Simply because she's doing it in the school where it seems not unreasonable the school/authorities might want to exert some control. If they banned her from writing a blog at home I would be seriously concerned. Clearly I'd rather they did neither and I'm pleased to see they have backed down but trying to impose your will on what someone writes in their free time...

nelly1

5,630 posts

232 months

Friday 15th June 2012
quotequote all

Odie

4,187 posts

183 months

Friday 15th June 2012
quotequote all
bhstewie said:
1 word - 'Anonymous'

elster

17,517 posts

211 months

Friday 15th June 2012
quotequote all
UF said:
We need more people like her.
Absolutely. Better content that half the journalists who are paid.

davepoth

29,395 posts

200 months

Friday 15th June 2012
quotequote all
elster said:
Absolutely. Better content that half the journalists who are paid.
Grammar looks to be spot on too, which is marvellous. Best of luck to her.