|
Eric Mc
67,253 posts
134 months
|
Murph7355 said: whoami said: It's common. 100% unsolicited calls requesting security information about your account from a genuine banking source are common? Really? I have accounts with two high street banking brands and I have received calls of this type from both on occasions. Not my favourite form of banking approach but is is relatively easy to deal with - as explained above. I've also had such calls from insurance companies.
|
|
|
Sticks.
3,105 posts
120 months
|
johnfm said: I disagree with the stupid assertion that paying high commissions means a business cannot work (tell that to the kitchen, bathroom and bedroom furnishing business). A matter of to what degree I suspect. Contributors to the R4 prog said that not only were people mis-sold PPI, but claims were turned down wherever possible, because there was so little money left to support the policy, it all being commission. A conributor who'd had a PPI company said he had been able to make a good profit on 10%, and offer a better policy.
|
|
|
Steffan
Original Poster
6,182 posts
97 months
|
I expect that readers will remember my suggestion of a three month moratorium on banking malpractice a few days ago in order that a judgement could be made in whether there is adequate and effective control in banking. If Reuters are correct in this article below, it would appear that Standard Chartered have provided the first evidence of wrongdoing. It is unconfirmed as yet but clearly a matter of concern. See: http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/08/06/idUSL2E8...
|
|
|
Oakey
13,696 posts
85 months
|
I was just speaking to a mates mother in law who went bankrupt three or four years ago after her business went pop. Afterwards she got a bank account at Barclays and said that as of about a year ago they've started offering her credit cards. Madness.
|
|
|
Eric Mc
67,253 posts
134 months
|
Steffan said: I expect that readers will remember my suggestion of a three month moratorium on banking malpractice a few days ago in order that a judgement could be made in whether there is adequate and effective control in banking. If Reuters are correct in this article below, it would appear that Standard Chartered have provided the first evidence of wrongdoing. It is unconfirmed as yet but clearly a matter of concern. See: http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/08/06/idUSL2E8...Just heard this in the evening news. Another day - another bank scandal. It's almost predictable now. Maybe they sold the Iranians PPI?
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
Steffan
Original Poster
6,182 posts
97 months
|
Eric Mc said: Steffan said: I expect that readers will remember my suggestion of a three month moratorium on banking malpractice a few days ago in order that a judgement could be made in whether there is adequate and effective control in banking. If Reuters are correct in this article below, it would appear that Standard Chartered have provided the first evidence of wrongdoing. It is unconfirmed as yet but clearly a matter of concern. See: http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/08/06/idUSL2E8...Just heard this in the evening news. Another day - another bank scandal. It's almost predictable now. Maybe they sold the Iranians PPI? The frequent recurrence of these disgraceful episodes of dishonesty in banking suggests to me that the controls that exist in banking are totally ineffective and not fit for purpose. Hence this post. When I suggested a moratorium on this post not ling ago, over a three month period, to review the recurrence of such criminal acts I thought that there would be more and more of these discoveries over the next three months. I did expect another "event" AKA obvious crookery, to arise in banking and hit the headlines on the financial press within a matter of weeks. Purely because I think the while sector is lacking control and therefore chances will be, and are being grabbed. I think many of the supporter and defenders of banking on PH and elsewhere are experienced financial men who understand the technicalities of the subject very well. The incisive questioning and detailed opposition to the criticisms of banking and the banking sector demonstrates their ability. However I cannot find a way to explain to these technocrats, that the whole banking sector has lost touch with reality in business. Hence my comment that a 90*% commission level cannot be afforded in genuinely profitable business but is the mainstay of fraudsters, attracted immediate criticism that there was no reason why 90% commission was not ordinary business. I think not. I am sure that these individuals genuinely believe that this is reality. That is where the banking sector has lost its contact with reality. No service industry can afford such commission levels and make a profit. I have grave doubts that the banking sector will return to profitability. It certainly will not with major failings, misselling, computer system failures and frauds in banking that are being revealed time after time after time. The next three months will give an opportunity to review the incidence of such events. I do think that more risks and gambles will be discovered.
|
|
|
johnfm
9,013 posts
119 months
|
Do you like the sound of keyboards tapping?
Your posts are getting longer and longer.
|
|
|
johnfm
9,013 posts
119 months
|
Steffan said: The frequent recurrence of these disgraceful episodes of dishonesty in banking suggests to me that the controls that exist in banking are totally ineffective and not fit for purpose. Hence this post.
When I suggested a moratorium on this post not ling ago, over a three month period, to review the recurrence of such criminal acts I thought that there would be more and more of these discoveries over the next three months. I did expect another "event" AKA obvious crookery, to arise in banking and hit the headlines on the financial press within a matter of weeks. Purely because I think the while sector is lacking control and therefore chances will be, and are being grabbed.
I think many of the supporter and defenders of banking on PH and elsewhere are experienced financial men who understand the technicalities of the subject very well. The incisive questioning and detailed opposition to the criticisms of banking and the banking sector demonstrates their ability.
However I cannot find a way to explain to these technocrats, that the whole banking sector has lost touch with reality in business. Hence my comment that a 90*% commission level cannot be afforded in genuinely profitable business but is the mainstay of fraudsters, attracted immediate criticism that there was no reason why 90% commission was not ordinary business. I think not.
I am sure that these individuals genuinely believe that this is reality. That is where the banking sector has lost its contact with reality. No service industry can afford such commission levels and make a profit.
I have grave doubts that the banking sector will return to profitability. It certainly will not with major failings, misselling, computer system failures and frauds in banking that are being revealed time after time after time. The next three months will give an opportunity to review the incidence of such events. I do think that more risks and gambles will be discovered. Do you eben know what this 'disgraceful' action is? Doing business with Iranian customers. Ooooh, how dishonest. Who the fvck gives the US the right to tell a bank who they can and cannot do business with. We let the US extradite UK citizens without evidence and it looks like they can tell companies who they can do business with too. THAT is what I call disgraceful.
|
|
|
Oakey
13,696 posts
85 months
|
johnfm said: Do you eben know what this 'disgraceful' action is?
Doing business with Iranian customers.
Ooooh, how dishonest.
Who the fvck gives the US the right to tell a bank who they can and cannot do business with.
We let the US extradite UK citizens without evidence and it looks like they can tell companies who they can do business with too.
THAT is what I call disgraceful. And if you really piss them off they'll just freeze your assets, raid your house and shut down your business and to hell with whether their actions are even legal. And if the case gets dismissed? Well f  k you, they'll continue to freeze your assets anyway; http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/07/governm...
|
|
|
Steffan
Original Poster
6,182 posts
97 months
|
johnfm said: Do you like the sound of keyboards tapping?
Your posts are getting longer and longer. The subjects you choose to comment upon on PH are your choice. This thread is about the lack of control in the banking sector. Presumably you cannot think of any comment to make in response to my post on yet another banking disgrace, revealed today, contained therein. In consequence, you wish to criticise my style in preference to addressing the content. That is also your choice. I would prefer a debate on the total lack of control in the banking sector. Hence my post.
|
|
|
johnfm
9,013 posts
119 months
|
Steffan said: johnfm said: Do you like the sound of keyboards tapping?
Your posts are getting longer and longer. The subjects you choose to comment upon on PH are your choice. This thread is about the lack of control in the banking sector. Presumably you cannot think of any comment to make in response to my post on yet another banking disgrace, revealed today, contained therein. In consequence, you wish to criticise my style in preference to addressing the content. That is also your choice. I would prefer a debate on the total lack of control in the banking sector. Hence my post. I find, upon reading your novellas, that you are repeating the same things you wrote in equally long winded wibblings last month and the month before. Have you anything new to add. other than "some people who work in banks break some rules sometimes and now the sky is going to fall in"? Or is that it?
|
|
|
HundredthIdiot
4,353 posts
153 months
|
johnfm said: Do you eben know what this 'disgraceful' action is?
Doing business with Iranian customers.
Ooooh, how dishonest. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-19155577 There are almost too many examples of dishonesty to quote, but... "Among the violations of the law, the bank is accused of: falsifying business records failing to maintain accurate books and records failing to report misconduct to the regulator in a timely manner evading Federal sanctions"
|
|
|
davepoth
19,878 posts
68 months
|
HundredthIdiot said: johnfm said: Do you eben know what this 'disgraceful' action is?
Doing business with Iranian customers.
Ooooh, how dishonest. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-19155577 There are almost too many examples of dishonesty to quote, but... "Among the violations of the law, the bank is accused of: falsifying business records failing to maintain accurate books and records failing to report misconduct to the regulator in a timely manner evading Federal sanctions" That's how one does business with Iran these days. However, there are very good reasons for not doing business with Iran at the moment. I've done a fair bit of business there over the last ten years so I've had my ear to the ground on the issue. Iran's economy is extremely centralised, with most industries being state owned. A substantial proportion of those industries are run by the Revolutionary Guard, who use the money to fund all kinds of shenanigans, including Hezbollah, most of the factions in Syria, and the PLO. What's shocking about this is the sheer size of the numbers. I did a bit of digging and found Iran's GDP for the period. http://www.google.co.uk/publicdata/explore?ds=d5bn...which averages $221bn over the period. Put simply, 11% of Iran's economy was funnelled through Standard Chartered in defiance of Sanctions put in place both in the US and the EU.
|
|
|
rich1231
16,613 posts
129 months
|
Loads of banks do business or did in Iran, even when it was not really acceptable in the US. It is one of the reasons that many banks have branches out there (ME etc) so that they can do things outside of US Jurisdictions and oversight. Doesnt mean what they are doing is dodgy. Lots of entities in the region wont do business with American banks and prefer European or Far Eastern entities.
|
|
|
davepoth
19,878 posts
68 months
|
rich1231 said: Loads of banks do business or did in Iran, even when it was not really acceptable in the US. It is one of the reasons that many banks have branches out there (ME etc) so that they can do things outside of US Jurisdictions and oversight. Doesnt mean what they are doing is dodgy. Lots of entities in the region wont do business with American banks and prefer European or Far Eastern entities. I'm very aware of the restrictions as my company had offices in the US, meaning I had to make sure we weren't breaking their rules either; and for SC to have been breaking those sanctions in 2001 they would have been dealing directly with the organisations that were very directly linked to terror. Some of the more recent additions to the sanctions lists have been more punitive than anything however. The way they were doing it, by falsifying wire transfer logs, is illegal in itself, regardless of who the money was going to. This could be very bad news for world banking.
|
|
|
crankedup
9,237 posts
112 months
|
johnfm said: Steffan said: johnfm said: Do you like the sound of keyboards tapping?
Your posts are getting longer and longer. The subjects you choose to comment upon on PH are your choice. This thread is about the lack of control in the banking sector. Presumably you cannot think of any comment to make in response to my post on yet another banking disgrace, revealed today, contained therein. In consequence, you wish to criticise my style in preference to addressing the content. That is also your choice. I would prefer a debate on the total lack of control in the banking sector. Hence my post. I find, upon reading your novellas, that you are repeating the same things you wrote in equally long winded wibblings last month and the month before. Have you anything new to add. other than "some people who work in banks break some rules sometimes and now the sky is going to fall in"? Or is that it? Give it up mate, its obvious you are out of your depth.
|
|
|
Ozzie Osmond
12,074 posts
115 months
|
Steffan said: I am sure that these individuals genuinely believe that this is reality. That is where the banking sector has lost its contact with reality. Everyone can see the problems - except the muppets on the inside who still think they're God's gift to humanity. No other industry in history has ever got away with this level of nonsense.
|
|
|
Steffan
Original Poster
6,182 posts
97 months
|
davepoth said: rich1231 said: Loads of banks do business or did in Iran, even when it was not really acceptable in the US. It is one of the reasons that many banks have branches out there (ME etc) so that they can do things outside of US Jurisdictions and oversight. Doesnt mean what they are doing is dodgy. Lots of entities in the region wont do business with American banks and prefer European or Far Eastern entities. I'm very aware of the restrictions as my company had offices in the US, meaning I had to make sure we weren't breaking their rules either; and for SC to have been breaking those sanctions in 2001 they would have been dealing directly with the organisations that were very directly linked to terror. Some of the more recent additions to the sanctions lists have been more punitive than anything however. The way they were doing it, by falsifying wire transfer logs, is illegal in itself, regardless of who the money was going to. This could be very bad news for world banking. That is precisely my view. From the way this is developing I can see Standard Chartered being closed down. Rightly so if half of the reported misfeance turns out to be true. If this fraud has been deliberately hidden and fraudulently covered up for ten tears, then a multi billion conspiracy has run undetected in this bank for ten years. Which clearly confirms that there is no effective control over banking.
|
|
|
Murph7355
9,413 posts
125 months
|
Ozzie Osmond said: Everyone can see the problems - except the muppets on the inside who still think they're God's gift to humanity. No other industry in history has ever got away with this level of nonsense. I'm sure if you dug hard enough you could find all manner of industries that have had their fair share of "scandal". Oil? Supermarkets? Automotive? Arms trade? Pharma? (Edited to add - I am fully aware two wrongs don't make a right. Also....politics?)
|
|
|
davepoth
19,878 posts
68 months
|
Murph7355 said: I'm sure if you dug hard enough you could find all manner of industries that have had their fair share of "scandal". Oil? Supermarkets? Automotive? Arms trade? Pharma?
(Edited to add - I am fully aware two wrongs don't make a right. Also....politics?) Scandal yes, but not of this order. $250bn. Just think about that. Two hundred and fifty billion dollars.
|
|