Scottish Referendum / Independence - Vol 2

[Edinburger]

simoid said:

Edinburger said:

isoimp said:

FREEDOM ???????????

What a bunch of frigging nutters the SNP supporters are . The feeble minded pillocks that support them and their policies have to be free loaders themselves who want us, the ones that pay tax to support them and the lifestyle,the Scottish ? ministers have managed to achieve at our expense.

Free prescriptions : Free university fees : Free Methadone. For fk sake. Wheres it going to end.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/scotland/sc...

Lets get rid of turnip heid ( The Great leader ) and his pile of manure. VIP will understand this as he talks plenty of it consistantly.

Edited by isoimp on Monday 8th October 10:08

Edited by isoimp on Monday 8th October 10:09

Edited by isoimp on Monday 8th October 10:09

WTF is this retarded comment all about? Crawl back under your rock, you utter clown.

It's usually easier to ignore the idiotic comments and have a reasoned debate with those likeminded folks.

Agreed

[Rollin]

Appropriate for who, Salmond and you nationalists or the whole of Scotland?

[Edinburger]

Rollin said:

Appropriate for who, Salmond and you nationalists or the whole of Scotland?

Jeez, it's like waiting for a bus. Two retared posts around the same time.

[thinfourth2]

Edinburger said:

Rollin said:

Appropriate for who, Salmond and you nationalists or the whole of Scotland?

Jeez, it's like waiting for a bus. Two retared posts around the same time.

Well how do you respond to the article that was linked

I'd link to it but you would ignore me as you class me as a paranoid idiot

[Edinburger]

thinfourth2 said:

Edinburger said:

Rollin said:

Appropriate for who, Salmond and you nationalists or the whole of Scotland?

Jeez, it's like waiting for a bus. Two retared posts around the same time.

Well how do you respond to the article that was linked

I'd link to it but you would ignore me as you class me as a paranoid idiot

In the same way I responded to that article yesterday: some good points, a few interesting angles, and some stats that I just don't beleive.

You?

[isoimp]

Edinburger said:

Rollin said:

Appropriate for who, Salmond and you nationalists or the whole of Scotland?

Jeez, it's like waiting for a bus. Two retared posts around the same time.

---

I purposely didnt metion you in the same manure sentence above as your contributions so far are not worth a mention,however since you mentioned "retared " posts. This sums up your intellect, which is just a notch lower than your buddy vip and the " Great Leader ".

Who released a murdering terrorist for his own political importance and managed in the process to disuade tourists from the US who bring much needed money to the Capital city and the name you so follishly mixed with a Mcdonalds to give you an sense of importance . you tt !

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/SNP/95942...


Trying to plant a Turnip heid

[London424]

Edinburger said:

I thought the clue was in the bit where I said "I was being facetious. The campaigns are barely off the ground and I doubt very much that this little nugget has been overlooked. So I fully expect to hear more as and when it's appropriate."

I saw that, but then asked what's a reasonable timescale for you? There are less than 2 years to the vote, there are going to be questions where information isn't available and will need time to analyse.

So when do you want information?

[madala]

....say no more.....

[Rollin]

Edinburger said:

Rollin said:

Appropriate for who, Salmond and you nationalists or the whole of Scotland?

Jeez, it's like waiting for a bus. Two retared posts around the same time.

I don't see what's retarded by asking why the yes campaign is being so secretive, to the point of going to court,to prevent important information being given to the Scottish people.

If you can't debate the topics and are happy for your government to do the same, then I suggest you leave the thread and leave it to people who can.

Edited by Rollin on Tuesday 9th October 00:23

[Edinburger]

isoimp said:

Edinburger said:

Rollin said:

Appropriate for who, Salmond and you nationalists or the whole of Scotland?

Jeez, it's like waiting for a bus. Two retared posts around the same time.

---

I purposely didnt metion you in the same manure sentence above as your contributions so far are not worth a mention,however since you mentioned "retared " posts. This sums up your intellect, which is just a notch lower than your buddy vip and the " Great Leader ".

Who released a murdering terrorist for his own political importance and managed in the process to disuade tourists from the US who bring much needed money to the Capital city and the name you so follishly mixed with a Mcdonalds to give you an sense of importance . you tt !

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/SNP/95942...


Trying to plant a Turnip heid

Okay, so you're talking about Abdelbaset al-Megrahi. A Scottish statute exists under Scots law which enables the release of any prisoner deemed by medical authorities to have three months or less to live and that's what the then Scottish Secretary of Justice, Kenny MacAskill, followed.

With the benefit of hindsight I agree that his release was proably a mistake. But Mr al-Megrahi isn't the first and certainly won't be the last terminally ill patient to outlive the doctor's expectation.

There's a very different argument around whether he was guilty or a scapegoat.

The rest of your post is just blah, blah, blah...

[Edinburger]

London424 said:

Edinburger said:

I thought the clue was in the bit where I said "I was being facetious. The campaigns are barely off the ground and I doubt very much that this little nugget has been overlooked. So I fully expect to hear more as and when it's appropriate."

I saw that, but then asked what's a reasonable timescale for you? There are less than 2 years to the vote, there are going to be questions where information isn't available and will need time to analyse.

So when do you want information?

Okay, I understand. I'd be getting concerned if this information and debate wasn't happening from the end of Q1 2013.

We need to appreciate that 2012 was a very 'British' year what with the Olympics, Jubilee, etc., so it would have been somewhat foolosh to launch the Scottish independence campaign in earnest then. Also, I think we need to appreciate that there is a risk of boring the electorate on this too - not everyone has quite so much interest in it as many of the posters here.

[Edinburger]

Rollin said:

Edinburger said:

Rollin said:

Appropriate for who, Salmond and you nationalists or the whole of Scotland?

Jeez, it's like waiting for a bus. Two retared posts around the same time.

I don't see what's retarded by asking why the yes campaign is being so secretive, to the point of going to court,to prevent important information being given to the Scottish people.

If you can't debate the topics and are happy for your government to do the same, then I suggest you leave the thread and leave it to people who can.

Edited by Rollin on Tuesday 9th October 00:23

Is that your question: "why is the yes campaign is being so secretive"?

My view is that the appropriate information will be made public as and when it's appropriate. Now is just too early, as per other post.

[BliarOut]

Edinburger said:

Rollin said:

Edinburger said:

Rollin said:

Appropriate for who, Salmond and you nationalists or the whole of Scotland?

Jeez, it's like waiting for a bus. Two retared posts around the same time.

I don't see what's retarded by asking why the yes campaign is being so secretive, to the point of going to court,to prevent important information being given to the Scottish people.

If you can't debate the topics and are happy for your government to do the same, then I suggest you leave the thread and leave it to people who can.

Edited by Rollin on Tuesday 9th October 00:23

Is that your question: "why is the yes campaign is being so secretive"?

My view is that the appropriate information will be made public as and when it's appropriate. Now is just too early, as per other post.

Because there would be sufficient time to fully consider the ramifications if it was made public now?

[Edinburger]

BliarOut said:

Because there would be sufficient time to fully consider the ramifications if it was made public now?

No. Because many people would be bored hearing about it constantly for the next two years.

[thinfourth2]

Edinburger said:

BliarOut said:

Because there would be sufficient time to fully consider the ramifications if it was made public now?

No. Because many people would be bored hearing about it constantly for the next two years.

So we can expect another 23 months 3 weeks and 6 days of flagging waving and a small article hidden away in the back pages of stamp collectors weekly (welsh languauge edition) stating how an independent Scotland will survive on the last day

[AstonZagato]

Edinburger said:

BliarOut said:

Because there would be sufficient time to fully consider the ramifications if it was made public now?

No. Because many people would be bored hearing about it constantly for the next two years.

So why were the Yes campaign so keen on pushing the date back?

[thinfourth2]

AstonZagato said:

So why were the Yes campaign so keen on pushing the date back?

As they know that they can spend a few years reminding everyone about the evil tories

The referendum which will effect scotland for generations into the future will be fought on evens many generations into the past and I think the anti-tory feelings will be whipped up in the coming years.

[Wombat3]

Edinburger said:

No. Because many people would be bored hearing about it constantly for the next two years.

Clearly there is much to hide then

Pathetic wkers.

[Wombat3]

thinfourth2 said:

The referendum which will effect scotland for generations into the future will be fought on evens many generations into the past and I think the anti-tory feelings will be whipped up in the coming years.

Which, given that England would be an independent Scotland's largest trading partner, and that an Independent Scotland would probably see the Tories into power in RUK for a long, long time, would be extremely short sighted and stupid.

But then "Stupid is as stupid does"

[ViperPict]

Edinburger said:

isoimp said:

Edinburger said:

Rollin said:

Appropriate for who, Salmond and you nationalists or the whole of Scotland?

Jeez, it's like waiting for a bus. Two retared posts around the same time.

---

I purposely didnt metion you in the same manure sentence above as your contributions so far are not worth a mention,however since you mentioned "retared " posts. This sums up your intellect, which is just a notch lower than your buddy vip and the " Great Leader ".

Who released a murdering terrorist for his own political importance and managed in the process to disuade tourists from the US who bring much needed money to the Capital city and the name you so follishly mixed with a Mcdonalds to give you an sense of importance . you tt !

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/SNP/95942...


Trying to plant a Turnip heid

Okay, so you're talking about Abdelbaset al-Megrahi. A Scottish statute exists under Scots law which enables the release of any prisoner deemed by medical authorities to have three months or less to live and that's what the then Scottish Secretary of Justice, Kenny MacAskill, followed.

With the benefit of hindsight I agree that his release was proably a mistake. But Mr al-Megrahi isn't the first and certainly won't be the last terminally ill patient to outlive the doctor's expectation.

There's a very different argument around whether he was guilty or a scapegoat.

The rest of your post is just blah, blah, blah...

Westminster have also released some objectionable folk on compassionate grounds. I'm sure it was fine under those circumstances though...