Scottish Referendum / Independence - Vol 2

Scottish Referendum / Independence - Vol 2

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

XCP

16,914 posts

228 months

Monday 15th October 2012
quotequote all
Shouldn't the English and Welsh get a vote?

WhereamI

6,887 posts

217 months

Monday 15th October 2012
quotequote all
simoid said:
Yes, your point is, what?

Great Britain is the mainland, broadly it is England, Wales and Scotland. It certainly isn't just England and Scotland.

simoid

19,772 posts

158 months

Monday 15th October 2012
quotequote all
WhereamI said:
simoid said:
Yes, your point is, what?

Great Britain is the mainland, broadly it is England, Wales and Scotland. It certainly isn't just England and Scotland.
Indeed!

Some could do with a wikibrowse, that's all smile

ViperPict

10,087 posts

237 months

Monday 15th October 2012
quotequote all
WhereamI said:
ViperPict said:
No, most of Scotland's revenue will not be from oil.
No it won't be, which illustrates the problem with independence, all of this is about 25 years too late. An independent Scotland with the peak of its oil production ahead of it could have been something but oil revenue is dying just when Scotland really needs it.
If oil was the only element of our economy then I would be concerned but it isn't.

XCP

16,914 posts

228 months

Monday 15th October 2012
quotequote all
Is it worth investing in some Scotch? I guess the price will be going up.

steviegunn

1,416 posts

184 months

Monday 15th October 2012
quotequote all
simoid said:
The United Kingdom of England, Wales and Northern Ireland wink
The Union of the Kingdom of England, Principality of Wales and Provinces of Northern Ireland or maybe UEW&NI for short.

ViperPict

10,087 posts

237 months

Monday 15th October 2012
quotequote all

IainT

10,040 posts

238 months

Monday 15th October 2012
quotequote all
XCP said:
Shouldn't the English and Welsh get a vote?
Having herd some of the drivel spouted on the news earlier by a separationist I'd like a bloody vote.

While we're at it can we give the Welsh and Irish the boot too?

ViperPict

10,087 posts

237 months

Monday 15th October 2012
quotequote all
IainT said:
XCP said:
Shouldn't the English and Welsh get a vote?
Having herd some of the drivel spouted on the news earlier by a separationist I'd like a bloody vote.

While we're at it can we give the Welsh and Irish the boot too?
You spell your name the Scottish way...

IainT

10,040 posts

238 months

Monday 15th October 2012
quotequote all
ViperPict said:
IainT said:
XCP said:
Shouldn't the English and Welsh get a vote?
Having herd some of the drivel spouted on the news earlier by a separationist I'd like a bloody vote.

While we're at it can we give the Welsh and Irish the boot too?
You spell your name the Scottish way...
Indeed and my best friend growing up was Scottish.

ViperPict

10,087 posts

237 months

Monday 15th October 2012
quotequote all
IainT said:
ViperPict said:
IainT said:
XCP said:
Shouldn't the English and Welsh get a vote?
Having herd some of the drivel spouted on the news earlier by a separationist I'd like a bloody vote.

While we're at it can we give the Welsh and Irish the boot too?
You spell your name the Scottish way...
Indeed and my best friend growing up was Scottish.
That must get you a vote surely?

martin84

5,366 posts

153 months

Monday 15th October 2012
quotequote all
I think Cameron's done well in the referendum negotiations because he's made sure it's a simple yes/no question. Most polls show the vast majority of Scots living in Scotland don't want independence, many want 'extra powers' but that's not on the menu. The overwhelming likelyhood is Salmond will lost this vote.

From a David Cameron point of view though there must be a tiny voice at the back of his brain hoping Scotland votes yes. Labour do well in Scotland and forcing Labour to fight the next election in England (which they usually lose) with only the backup of Wales and Northern Ireland would help Cameron. However he probably doesn't want to go down in history as the PM who lost Scotland after 300 years.

Caulkhead

4,938 posts

157 months

Monday 15th October 2012
quotequote all
XCP said:
Is it worth investing in some Scotch? I guess the price will be going up.
I doubt it, most is owned by Diageo.

ViperPict

10,087 posts

237 months

Monday 15th October 2012
quotequote all
martin84 said:
I think Cameron's done well in the referendum negotiations because he's made sure it's a simple yes/no question. Most polls show the vast majority of Scots living in Scotland don't want independence, many want 'extra powers' but that's not on the menu. The overwhelming likelyhood is Salmond will lost this vote.

From a David Cameron point of view though there must be a tiny voice at the back of his brain hoping Scotland votes yes. Labour do well in Scotland and forcing Labour to fight the next election in England (which they usually lose) with only the backup of Wales and Northern Ireland would help Cameron. However he probably doesn't want to go down in history as the PM who lost Scotland after 300 years.
I think that they were so focussed on the single question issue that they pretty much gave the SG everything else they wanted.

A theory doing the rounds is that the SNP genuinely never wanted Devo-Max as an option - independence would never have been delivered with that as an option. But they made the NO campaign believe they did want it. Classic bluff. And now we have the single question 'forced' upon us and, lo and behold, the soon to be published public consultation shows that the vast majority of Scots DID want it. But it is now very well documented that the 'evil Tories' demanded we couldn't have that option. It could be seen as a VERY well played hand. Or not as the case may but I guess time will now tell.

General Price

5,249 posts

183 months

Monday 15th October 2012
quotequote all
ViperPict said:
I think that they were so focussed on the single question issue that they pretty much gave the SG everything else they wanted.

A theory doing the rounds is that the SNP genuinely never wanted Devo-Max as an option - independence would never have been delivered with that as an option. But they made the NO campaign believe they did want it. Classic bluff. And now we have the single question 'forced' upon us and, lo and behold, the soon to be published public consultation shows that the vast majority of Scots DID want it. But it is now very well documented that the 'evil Tories' demanded we couldn't have that option. It could be seen as a VERY well played hand. Or not as the case may but I guess time will now tell.

simoid

19,772 posts

158 months

Monday 15th October 2012
quotequote all
ViperPict said:
It could be seen as a VERY well played hand. Or not as the case may but I guess time will now tell.
It's all pointless, anyway. POINTLESS!

Robert Burns

909 posts

169 months

Monday 15th October 2012
quotequote all
ViperPict said:
WhereamI said:
ViperPict said:
No, most of Scotland's revenue will not be from oil.
No it won't be, which illustrates the problem with independence, all of this is about 25 years too late. An independent Scotland with the peak of its oil production ahead of it could have been something but oil revenue is dying just when Scotland really needs it.
If oil was the only element of our economy then I would be concerned but it isn't.
Your all looking at the industry in the wrong way.

Instead of the money from taxes being made. Look at it as taxes + jobs. Where Aberdeen has over 120,000 jobs just for it with 120,000 needed before 2020. Then the industries that run off this that have places around the UK providing jobs in almost every corner in the UK from Aberdeen to Slough. When you look at it that way its a good provider for the economy.

ViperPict

10,087 posts

237 months

Tuesday 16th October 2012
quotequote all
General Price said:
ViperPict said:
I think that they were so focussed on the single question issue that they pretty much gave the SG everything else they wanted.

A theory doing the rounds is that the SNP genuinely never wanted Devo-Max as an option - independence would never have been delivered with that as an option. But they made the NO campaign believe they did want it. Classic bluff. And now we have the single question 'forced' upon us and, lo and behold, the soon to be published public consultation shows that the vast majority of Scots DID want it. But it is now very well documented that the 'evil Tories' demanded we couldn't have that option. It could be seen as a VERY well played hand. Or not as the case may but I guess time will now tell.
Yes, it did indeed take some testicular fortitude to play that hand... biggrin

ViperPict

10,087 posts

237 months

Tuesday 16th October 2012
quotequote all

In all seriousness though, both sides (and anyone the referendum affects) should feel in a 'better place' right now than last week. At least we have a legally binding vote that both sides (on the face of it) claim to be happy with. Let battle commence. It's going to be a very interesting 2 years. biggrin

martin84

5,366 posts

153 months

Tuesday 16th October 2012
quotequote all
This is going to be a fight worthy of popcorn. On the face of it the Lib Dems and Labour will back David Cameron up on his wish to keep the Union intact but there's other games underway here. Scotland matters to the Labour Party as they currently hold 41 Scottish seats which make up 16% of their total from 2010. The SNP are in a position where every other party is against them, Labour are going to attack them and they will get vicious.

This should be good.
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED