Conservative MP - Police Rant.

Author
Discussion

Wills2

22,893 posts

176 months

Tuesday 18th December 2012
quotequote all

Oh dear, I can't believe the amount of fallout there is going to be if that is true. All this over the use of a gate?

10 Pence Short

32,880 posts

218 months

Tuesday 18th December 2012
quotequote all
Milky Joe said:
Who needs a court, you've already decided.
That's so deliciously ironic, it deserves a quoting.

I seem to remember a whole lot of Police officers intimating the Government Minister was guilty, without any trial and simply on the basis of what looks like being misconduct by at least one Police officer.

Hypocritical, ill thought out nonsense which is unfortunately all too prevalent from some around here.

saaby93

32,038 posts

179 months

Tuesday 18th December 2012
quotequote all
It's only another in a sequence of witch hunts
First it was a minister now a police officer

The radio is now saying whoever the officer was, who is alleged to have leaked the words from a minister to a member of parliament who is alleged to have leaked to the press, was not present at the time.
Thats separate from the original officer who its said has written in his book what he thought the minister had said.
Thats not to say thats what the minister actually said
None of us claim to hear everything correctly.
The minister claims he said something different and unless it's recorded only he will know

Meanwhile the Beeb is suggesting these new reports may clear the ministers name
As far as I know the minister hasnt been shown to be guilty of anything so doesnt need his name clearing unless its in the eyes of court Beeb.

Is it all a deck of premises built on a previous layer of premises with people at each stage subjected to trial by media

What's the end result?



Edited by saaby93 on Tuesday 18th December 13:27

XCP

16,939 posts

229 months

Tuesday 18th December 2012
quotequote all
10 Pence Short said:
That's so deliciously ironic, it deserves a quoting.

I seem to remember a whole lot of Police officers intimating the Government Minister was guilty, without any trial and simply on the basis of what looks like being misconduct by at least one Police officer.

Hypocritical, ill thought out nonsense which is unfortunately all too prevalent from some around here.
I think M Joe was referring to the taser v blind man case, not Gategategate.

FurtiveFreddy

8,577 posts

238 months

Tuesday 18th December 2012
quotequote all
Interesting report on C4 News tonight showing CCTV of the incident.

Looking a bit smelly...

Pesty

42,655 posts

257 months

Tuesday 18th December 2012
quotequote all
Radio 4 tonight were saying the policeman who claimed to be an eye witness and leaked teh story was an off duty protection officer who was not even there.

Wow He's managed to be less honest than a politician. That's low.


I wonder what else he has lied about during his career.

anonymous-user

55 months

Tuesday 18th December 2012
quotequote all
Melton Mowbray Constabulary, perhaps.

Pesty

42,655 posts

257 months

Tuesday 18th December 2012
quotequote all
Chanel 4 now.

FurtiveFreddy

8,577 posts

238 months

Tuesday 18th December 2012
quotequote all
Very resourceful of C4 to get hold of the CCTV...

Dispatches in good journalism shocker!

chris watton

22,477 posts

261 months

Tuesday 18th December 2012
quotequote all
Oh dear...

It's beginning to look like we can't trust anyone, isn't it!

wolves_wanderer

12,387 posts

238 months

Tuesday 18th December 2012
quotequote all
Breadvan72 said:
Melton Mowbray Constabulary, perhaps.
hehe

turbobloke

104,025 posts

261 months

Tuesday 18th December 2012
quotequote all
chris watton said:
Oh dear...

It's beginning to look like we can't trust anyone, isn't it!
Indeed. Did this BiB not allow others to believe it was a MoP who was near the incident with a nephew (but was not) who sent the email? And the email content wasn't in fact eye witness testimony but a slightly altered text from the DT? If so, no wonder the BiB has been arrested. Is this not AtPtCoJ?

anonymous-user

55 months

Tuesday 18th December 2012
quotequote all
Pesty said:
Chanel 4 now.
My wife prefers Chanel Number 5.

Pesty

42,655 posts

257 months

Tuesday 18th December 2012
quotequote all
Not just that one policeman

but the police federation came out and said "he did not say what he said" after the meeting which thankfully for The chief whip was recorded.

This was a police stitch up.


fk me people I'm almost having some sympathy for a fking Tory MP.


Breadvan72 said:
My wife prefers Chanel Number 5.
It's a lot more expensive though.
(work keyboard gets a but sticky and I can't spell for st.)

Pesty

42,655 posts

257 months

Tuesday 18th December 2012
quotequote all
Lol policeman who made false claims complaining about breach of privacy smile....

FurtiveFreddy

8,577 posts

238 months

Tuesday 18th December 2012
quotequote all
Note to plod: if a TV reporter phones you up, try not to reveal any sensitive information to them. They might tell someone else about it...

Pesty

42,655 posts

257 months

Tuesday 18th December 2012
quotequote all
If he didn't send the emails why did he complain about breech of privacy for private emails between himself and his MP confused

FurtiveFreddy

8,577 posts

238 months

Tuesday 18th December 2012
quotequote all
This could re-emerge as one of the most interesting bits of investigative journalism of the year.

Makes a change from Savilegate.

Pesty

42,655 posts

257 months

Tuesday 18th December 2012
quotequote all
Yes

I'm not an expert on these things but to this uneducated mind it looked like a very good investigative report.


FurtiveFreddy

8,577 posts

238 months

Tuesday 18th December 2012
quotequote all
There's another thread on SP&L about the whole 'plebgate' thing with some of our BiB contributors. Will be interesting to see what they make of it all...

http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&a...